Election integrity is essential. It ensures fair and free elections. So removing fraud from the equation should be a top priority.
Apparently that is the view Jeff Bezos holds. You know the guy that owns Amazon and the Washington Post? That’s Jeff.
The Washington Post ran who knows how many articles espousing the safety and security of mail in voting for the, let me check my notes, oh the Presidential Election.
But what does Jeff say when the vote is to unionize an Albama Amazon facility?
If you guessed that Jeffy Poo held to the opinions of the exalted Washington Post urinalists, you be wrong. Weird, I thought you couldn’t question journalistic integrity.
Jeff’s lawyers are saying, in the case of a vote to unionize the facility, that mail in voting will decrease turnout and create security concerns in a unionization election. Also arguing “concerns about election security run particularly high” due to the use of “an unreliable electronic signature platform.”
And in another gut wrenching turn of events, AOC is also blasting Amazon on Twitter to let the facility unionize.
This is two days in a row I find myself dry heaving from agreeing with with Democrats. And one of them being AOC. What an utter clown world this is.
My only message to Bezos and Amazon, you get what you (expletive) deserve.
One reply on “O Hypocracy, your bounds are unknown to thee!”
“…The ultimate purpose of creating a pseudo-reality is power, which the constructed pseudo-reality grants in many ways. Though these means are many, we should name a few. First, the pseudo-reality is always constructed such that it structurally advantages those who accept it over those who do not, frequently by overt double standards and through moral-linguistic traps. Double standards in this regard will always favor those who accept pseudo-reality as reality and will always disfavor those who seek the truth…
“Second, the very assertion of pseudo-reality demoralizes all who are pressed into engaging with it by the mere fact of being something false that must be treated as true. We should never underestimate how psychologically weakening and damaging it is to be forced to treat as true something that is not true, with the effect strengthening the more obviously false it is…
“Thus, third, by trading off normal people’s assumptions that seemingly serious people care about what is true, they successfully force normal people to verify aspects of the pseudo-reality even in the act of denying it…”
Psychopathy and the Origins of Totalitarianism, by James Lindsayhttps://newdiscourses.com/2020/12/psychopathy-origins-totalitarianism/