Recall and Audit Update – Not much news, but encouraging.
Gotta appreciate a man who will say he likes cigars and Makers Mark.
Categories
Recall and Audit Update – Not much news, but encouraging.
Gotta appreciate a man who will say he likes cigars and Makers Mark.
20 replies on “Many Are Watching What is Happening – Arizona Forensic Audit Update”
Here are portions of another report on Texas’ test of the Dominion System that recommended certification be denied:
“Adjudication results can be lost. In the January exam, during adjudication of the ballots in the test election, one of the Dominion representatives made a series of mistakes that caused the entire batch of adjudication results to be lost. We did not see this problem again during this exam, but the adjudication system is unchanged, so this vulnerability is still present…
“Installation is complex, error prone, and tedious. I counted 184 steps in their installation manual before deciding to estimate the remaining steps. I estimate a total of about 500 steps are required to install the software. I did not count steps that merely said something like “Click OK” or “Click Next.” This installation manual is 412 pages long with an additional 23 pages of front matter — contents, lists of figures, and the like…
“According to the Dominion representatives, there are eight Windows services that must be started in a certain order; however, the order that steps must be done is not the same as the order they appear on the menus of the Dominion product.
“The installation we witnessed took all day. Apparently, a mistake was made (accidently skipping one of the reboot steps) and the Dominion representatives, although clearly knowledgeable, were not able to recover before we broke for lunch. This was despite telephone consultations with other Dominion experts and the use of a troubleshooting guide that Dominion declined to make available to the examiners. Over lunch they decided to start the installation over, and it was successful the second time, finishing before the end of the day. Altogether, the installation took about 8 hours…
“Disappearing Message. At one point while scanning ballots, something flashed on the display so briefly we could not read it. After several attempts to re-scan the ballot, we were able to discern that it was a message reading “Ambiguous Marks” that was displayed for a second or less. It then reverts to the “System Ready” message. The voter has no way of knowing what, if anything, is wrong since the error message does not persist long enough to read it…”
The entire evaluation can be read here: https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/forms/sysexam/oct2019-sneeringer.pdf
Thanks for sharing this. By chance, I just came across an analysis of the Dominion System commissioned by the TX Sec of State prior to Texas’ rejection of Dominion. In addition to hardware problems the analyst noted, here is a portion detailing some of his other concerns:
“…Use of non-sequential numbered paper ballots as required by the Texas Constitution cannot be created within the Democracy 5.5 System. Instead, the only way to comply with this requirement of the law would be to hand-write and/or pre-print paper with serial numbers in a range for the selected precinct and then manually intermingle the ballots so their numbers are not sequential…
“…The adjudication portion of the tabulation process in the election management software was problematic and showed that the handwritten write-ins subject to adjudication were not easily picked up by the ballot scanner. This poor resolution on the scanner also failed to pick up some of the printed wording on the ballots. In a follow-up, the vendor stated that only black Sharpie markers should be used for marking the ballots; however, when the black sharpie was used during testing, it did, on a few occasions, bleed through to the back side of the two-sided ballot in such a way that it could confuse the ballot scanner or kick the ballot out.
“…The paths for the import of election data in into the election management program also showed multiple opportunities for mistakes that required three (3) separate restarts of the adjudication process…” The rest of this analyst’s report can be read here: https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/forms/sysexam/jan2019-hurley.pdf
I will honestly not be surprised if once they actually get to the machines and start the audit. They will have been erased/reset so the whole thing will be moot. i.e. Hillary’s server, emails, and even phones…..
If that can and did happen that may also be shown once the forensic audit gets going. To have someone like Phil Waldron on the case seems very good news to me, especially since I’ve watched several lengthy interviews with him. He and his team have nothing to lose and may actually gain more info than anyone thinks.
This speaks to having certifiable legal evidence shown by government trained experts that can be brought to court and very likely ruled for discovery. Even if no court will take it it still matters. Arizona will show verifiable expert evidence of the harm of having computer linked software, possible foreign interference, and a compromised election system.
Thank God for men and women who stand up to the election fraud. Dr. Lyle Rapacki with his Appeal to Heaven pamphlet is one such man. What good news!
Great news!! NOT to be discounted. Col. Phil Waldron and other cyber security experts will be doing a forensic exam of Maricopa county election results via the machines, you just aren’t whistling Dixie! This is fabulous news! Sixteen other states are watching. this as 5 Maricopa Co. AZ supervisors are being recalled. AZ is leading the nation on examining what actually was done using the means of election fraud. It is going to be awesome!!!
Is Jovan Hutton Pullitzer involved too?
I haven’t heard that. I believe (from what Pullitzer showed in the GA election fraud hearings) that he has advanced kinesthetic expertise in examining paper artifacts such as the authenticity of printed, folded ballots and the inked-in circles on ballots. He said he can tell in a moment if a paper ballot is valid or fraudulent. If ballots are being audited, I think he’d be hard to discredit!
He appears to be a genius inventor with patents on his cell phone tools/apps most of us use every day.
I’m not getting my hopes up. Even if the evidence is clear, the officials will no doubt declare there was nothing amiss.
Many of us are not willing to accept that answer. That’s part of why we are recalling the board members.
Is Recall the only option?
Are board members appointed, or elected?
Are resources being used to recall people who have been appointed by people who are not inclined to listen to you?
Maybe target the people who put the board members on the board?
Act, but act as though you only have a few rounds of ammunition left.
The board members are elected. Vacancies are filled by other members, the appointee must be of the same party as the member being replaced.
Godspeed.
let us not forget, this is one of the people the democrats are calling a terrorist.
So what? That only means the accused is over the target.
don’t be so negative and quick to assume negativity in others.
You’re right. I spoke in haste. Good reminder. Thank you.
🙂 thanks. It is all to easy to come across as negative in text, I fall into this issue myself, as do we all I suppose.
My point was that this is clearly a nice guy, someone you would want as a neighbor, which makes the dems calling him a terrorist nothing more than the dems outing themselves as the bad guys.
Thanks for writing back. Hope you have a very good day!
you too.