Categories
Right Angle

Biden Foreign Policy Inspired by Highest Ambitions of Chinese and Russian Thug Governments

Who’s in charge of American foreign policy? Have they read any history?

President Joe Biden’s pick for U.S. ambassador to China has deep ties to the Chinese Communist regime — so deep it seems Nick Burns was representing China’s interests. Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin shuts off access to the Black Sea when Biden scotches plans to send in two U.S. Navy destroyers over Russia’s meddling in Ukraine. Who’s in charge of American foreign policy? Have they read any history?

Stephen Green, Bill Whittle and Scott Ott create 20 new episodes of Right Angle each month thanks to our Members. Join us now.

Video below hosted at Rumble.

Listen to the Audio Version

19 replies on “Biden Foreign Policy Inspired by Highest Ambitions of Chinese and Russian Thug Governments”

Our three great threats are CCP, Communists Russia and Iran. I don’t see dribbling Joe standing up against any of them. A damn shame and a stain on US.

The National Pulse may be the best news source out there right now for news that matters which the legacy media ignores or lies about. They are doing genuine investigative journalism. America’s Voice News is a close second. They are both reporting heavily on China and how the CCP has infiltrated, corrupted and bribed bureaucrats, politicians, journalists, universities, and every person they think could be an “influencer.” NP’s newest reports on CCP bribing of journalists names names. AV is reporting also on the sieve at the U.S. border with Mexico, with real investigative journalists in the war zone.

With Romania ‘joining’ NATO and wanting into the EU there is some doubt that the Turkish policy concerning naval ships in the Bosporus is relevant today. Romania has the hulls. Everything else is technology that can be shipped over land to fit out a ship. So sailing in may be an obsolete gesture. Russian feels besieged. It always has for 1000 years. It has never learned true democracy, free market, jury law, contract law etc. Its never leaned how to be a strong but good neighbor.

No Romania, Hungary and the Baltic states are joining NATO openly. The Russians are turning purple with fear and rage. Surrounded yet again with foes on the frontier and no more buffer states. Its their greatest fear. Being surrounded is not by itself bad. Just ask Sweden, Switzerland and the Czech republic. Some how Russia sees only threats.

Putin may be a bad dude but have you looked at the leaders of all the other parties? The only person truly on Putin’s right is a libertarian party with a disputed leadership. Boris Fedyukin and Yaroslav Conway. 1,000 members nationwide!
Alexei Navalny is the biggest threat to Putin with 27% of the vote in one case but few seats and it has a platform that’s a little left of Putin on some things; tax and impossible pension promises. If he were running in the USA he would be called a blue dog democrat. There is effective blocking of the party registration nationwide. He and his party are in jail so they are not likely to replace Putin anytime soon. Popularity helps keep you out of jail but only if your support base is too big to jail and in Navalny’s case its only a few thousand people willing to go public as supporters, not the millions needed. 
Everyone else is far to the left wanting socialism or communism. Even the monarchists want monopolistic centralization.

One of the problems with having a thousand year history is getting stuck in it. Centralization is so 20th-century.

Those stories about voter suppression are all just accepted on face value — did anyone bother to compare them to the similar ones on the US? Like the new G law being equivalent to Jim Craw?
I wish people been more consistent in fake news consumption.
Navalny is just a mickey mouse picked up by the western media because he fits all the narrative. With the usual coherency level. Yeah, Putin is the killer we all know that. And N is alive because he has the plot armor. Can we get back to the real world?
His general popularity is in single digits at best. His best result is that 27% on Moscow, far behind the leader. He’s about as viable as AOC running for governor of Texas.

Sadly true. My point exactly. Its a Russian problem not just a Putin problem. You could say the same for Yeltsin, Gorbachev, Stalin, Lenin, the tsars good and bad. The culture favors autocracy for some reason.

The situation in the Black Sea is touchy. Today after the above video was created, Russia announced it was withdrawing troops from the Ukraine border. Ukraine says that in the process Russia has repositioned some units with advanced military capabilities to permanent locations. It’s a “give with the right hand and take with the left hand” kind of situation at this moment.

I have heard scuttlebutt that it was actually the Turks that told the Biden Administration not to transit the Dardanelle/Bosporus Straits. It appears, though I cannot verify this, that Putin made a call to Ankara and Turkey caved after the call. Like I said, this is just scuttlebutt so take that all with a grain of salt. After I heard this I did some research in publicly published sources and could only find a single instance where this was indicated. This may or may not be reliable information, I’d give it about 60% confidence.

Right now Russia has its naval assets, most of its warships, in the Sea of Azov on the eastern side of the Crimean Peninsula. The indication that Russia is actually going to take some sort of action will be if those ships, now in friendly well protected waters, transit the Kerch Strait and sortie into the Black Sea proper, then move to the Karknit Bay area on the western side of the Crimean Peninsula. That would put Russian naval assets in a position to support land operations in Ukraine and a dead giveaway of Russian intentions.

If we see that naval movement that will be the signal that Russia is initiating offensive operations on Ukrainian territory. Russia is a poor country, they cannot afford to make a move like that just for appearances and for purposes of sabre-rattling. If they spend the money to deploy those ships west of the Crimea they mean business and expect to get a return on that investment.

While this situation is occurring, keep an eye on the Baltic Sea. It is not at all unlike Russia to make a stink in the Black Sea in the effort to distract from something going on in the Baltic. Russia is very, very unhappy about losing warm water ports in former Baltic satellite states like the Port of Riga, Latvia.

While Biden is in office may be perceived as the only assured near-future opportunity to get away with something. When Biden says the words “border crisis” in an unguarded moment to the press and the White House Press Office denies his obvious meaning in using those words — That sends a clear signal to both Russia and China that there is doubt about who is actually in charge here in America. That is never a good thing for foreign policy no matter which Party is in power here at the moment.

See Bill’s video entitled “You Really Ought to Go Home” for some insight on the virtues of strength through superior firepower.

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/X9VCs_GpJIg” title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture” allowfullscreen></iframe>

In case that doesn’t embed correctly, and it hasn’t in the past for me, here’s a direct link to that video —

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9VCs_GpJIg&ab_channel=TownhallMedia

Thanks for the reminder. Yet another example that Bill has really studied and knows this stuff well.
Though, that hair. Thank God he met Natasha 😉

For those who have not listened to Bill’s “What We Saw: The Cold War” please do as he spends almost an hour discussing what he and Scott both said about negotiating with thugs and dictators. Can’t recall off the top of my head but the blockade of Cuba was an example. Based upon previous dealings, the Soviet Union fully expected Kennedy to back down. That he didn’t gave the pause to rethink.
Said another way, if you never stand up to the bully, he will continue to take your lunch money.

It is my sincere prayer that We The People will be able to eventually recover from this clown show/dumpster fire. This current regressive “progressive” administration, along with all the “useful” IDIOTS out there, bought their way into power but NONE of these are qualified to represent MY interests.

I suppose it all depends on how many years we are forced to live under this tyranny, along with the will of right-minded resistance we can muster.

To build on Scott’s statement from a different perspective – I have nothing against Americans, but rather I’m against the thugocracy that’s running the country. The Radical Leftists that have taken over the Democratic Party have the exact opposite view

Everyone seems to be disregarding a major point.
It is pretty clear that vast swaths of the Democrat Party and their supporters actually believe that China, Russia, Iran, and the like SHOULD succeed and that the USA deserves to be taken down a few pegs and become a second rate irrelevant nation.
Only viewed through that lens does this Ambassador Burns nonsense make sense. It isn’t naiveté or wishful thinking; it is a conscious policy.

This started with Barry O and his American Unexeptionalism – not sure why anyone is surprised that the Harris* administration’s foreign policy is a continiuation

Yes, I fail to understand why Trump isn’t out there every single day stating: “Here is today’s example of the Harris Administration’s policy of America Last.” Perhaps followed with, “I would have done X instead.”

Leave a Reply