For those that unquestioningly support the efforts behind Warp Speed, my response is, fast does not necessarily equal effective. I’m posting this [novel] info as a new blog post because when I attempted to include it as a response to a previous post, it failed. I suspect there is a character limit when submitting comments.
This is not a vaccine in the traditional sense. A vaccine eliminates the disease – this one does not. When the CDC changes the definition of what the word ‘vaccine’ means, that is your first clue. It’s a shot. Like a flu shot is a shot because you have to have one every year due to virus mutation. In this case, it appears that you have to have one every 5-6 months as it completely loses its effectiveness – hence, the push for boosters.
Case Tracking, CDC:
SEPTEMBER 10, 2020
New Covid cases = 38,061
Vaccinated Americans = 0
SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
New Covid cases = 76,427
Vaccinated Americans = 178,000,000
Survival Rates, CDC:
0-10 years old: 0.00003 (99.997% survival rate)
20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98% survival rate)
50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5% survival rate)
70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6% survival rate)
US Flu Cases, CDC
2012: 34 million
2013: 30 million
2014: 30 million
2015: 24 million
2016: 29 million
2017: 45 million
2018: 36 million
2019: 38 million
2020: 1,822
Where did the flu go? It is interesting to note that the CDC dropped PCR testing last July for Covid as it could not distinguish between Covid and influenza viruses.
The approved product name for the Pfizer shot is COMIRNATY. It was developed in Germany and approved in Europe first as CE approvals are much easier to obtain due to needing less clinical data. The FDA was politically pressured to release approval using that same amount of data. So, this approval doesn’t meet the typical standards.
Secondly, this is not a typical ‘vaccine’. The Pfizer and Moderna products are mRNA vaccines. mRNA technology had only been previously used for treating cancer patients and their use was not FDA approved. A typical vaccine uses either a weakened or dead version of the virus. J&J’s vaccine is a typically formulated vaccine. Therefore, we do not know what the long-term effects of the mRNA vaccines are. Robert W Malone, MD, the one who developed this technology – posted the following on July 19, 2021:
As someone who worked in the medical device industry – with 17 of those years in labeling, I’m intimately familiar with what is required to be put into an IFU (instructions for use). The link below will take you to the COMIRNATY IFU that is intended for use by the physician:
https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download
If you’re not familiar with IFUs, the sections of interest are Warnings and Precautions, Contraindications (who or what conditions it shouldn’t be used for / under) and Adverse Events / Reactions.
When you list adverse events / reactions, if anyone has died during the course of the clinical trial, it is typically listed first in the list. In this IFU, you won’t find it until you reach page 18 as a bullet point twice under Table 6 – Vaccine Efficacy. They only list one death. This number does not coincide with what was found at VAERS (the agency where adverse events are reported).
The IFU is also very clear that it is approved only for those 16 years of age and older. Yet our government is pushing to administer it to children starting with kindergarten under the EUA. Also, while being administered under EUA before they obtained approval, there was / is no recourse that anyone could /can take if something went / goes wrong. The Pharma companies were / are exempt from any liability.
Moving on from the IFU, here are some stats from VAERS as of Sept. 26 (Only 1% of the vaccinated population reported at this date, so chances are, these numbers are actually higher):
- 701,559 Adverse Events
- 60,741 Hospitalizations
- 80,393 Urgent Care
- 110,839 Dr.’s Office Visits
- 5,959 Anaphylaxis
- 8,156 Bells Palsy
- 6,637 Heart Attacks
- 5,765 Myocarditis
- 1,862 Miscarriages
- 3,025 Thrombocyopenia/Low Platelet
- 15,013 Life Threatening
- 28,168 Severe Allergic Reaction
- 8,153 Shingles
- 19,210 Permanently Disabled
- 14,925 Deaths
The majority of the adverse events collected are not listed in the IFU.
Most deaths occurred within 1 day after receiving the shot. The death rates at 2-3 remained high with them dropping off substantially after the 3rd day. It is important to note that after 500 deaths, it is a requirement by law that the pharmaceutical(s) be pulled from the market. Yet, it’s still out there and they’re still pushing everyone to get it.
Project Veritas did a series on the vaccine (videos appear in the middle of the articles):
PART 1 (Sep. 20, 2021)
PART 2 (Sep. 22, 2021)
PART 3 (Sep. 27, 2021)
PART 4 (Oct. 4, 2021)
PART 5 (Oct.6, 2021)
Per Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ:
In Israel, 51% of the deaths from Covid were in the vaccinated group. Additionally, in the over 65-year-olds, vaccination resulted in death from Covid 40 times more than in unvaccinated people.
If you are a pro-lifer, you need to know that the cell lines of aborted fetuses were used for testing in the Pfizer vaccine (watch Part 1 of Project Veritas video).
Other Considerations:
The CEO of Pfizer had to cancel his trip to Israel due to not being fully vaccinated. It’s his product, so you have to ask why? If anyone is an advertisement for this ‘vaccine’, he’d be it.
Two Senior FDA Officials Quit over Booster Shots
You also have to ask yourself why nurses are quitting nationwide rather than get the ‘vaccine’.
Lastly, I’ve heard reports that contracts between Pfizer and countries in Europe require that they not use Hydroxychloriquine or Ivermectin for treatment or their contracts would be cancelled. If this is true for them it’s probably also true for the US, and it would explain the resistance to the use of those drugs. I’m still doing my homework on that one.
And there you go.
In my opinion, the whole thing reeks to high heaven. There is evil afoot in Isengard and the West is no longer safe!
5 replies on “To Vaccinate or Not To Vaccinate”
My general note I made several times: the vaxx has lot of problems that are real. That can be used for good arguments. Diluting the list with bogus and BS points undermines it bigtime.
That includes the grammar-police nitpicking on what we call ‘vaccine’ followed by mostly inaccurate or outright false claims. Suppose brandon would come out tomorrow and announce the end of all vaccine mandates are immediately canceled. Then add, that instead we invokes inocculation mandates involving the same products. Are we ahead by an inch?
similarly, CDC issued tons of bogus claims and lot of their recommendations are incoherent BS and/or going against all the epidemiology science. However the recent adjustment of the vaccine definition actually improves it to mean how we used the term in the last 3-4 decades. It’s a real wonder that someone can pick out maybe their single sensible action from all the mess. 🙁
At the tail you link the article on P ceo. What exactly you want to consider about that? Did you bother to read the linked article beyond the headline? It is from March, a period actually vulnerable people were standing in a long line to get the product. So it makes perfect sense to not waste it on less vulnerable specimens. And later that ceo did get it. So what is the advertisement here?
TLDR: if you add obviously bogus points to the message, people will have little reason to trust the rest of it.
I agree that with regard to the CDC, there is little to trust there due to their frequent backpedaling and untrustworthy direction. But they are the organization that is consistently used to support whatever claims Brandon wants to make, and according to their own data, it doesn’t support their stances. With regard to the data points, most were put up while Trump was in office.
Regarding the Pfizer CEO, yes that was back in March. But I find his excuse that he was allowing the vaccines for others weak at best. He had one shot and knew he was going to a country that required full vaccination at that time. He only needed one more shot, so we’re not talking about a hundred or even ten doses – just one. It doesn’t have a good look for the developer of a ‘lifesaving drug’. I stand by my statements. It’s entirely up to you whether you want to trust the entire message or not.
Are you sure they got FDA approval? I heard they just extended the Emergency Use Authorization, and the Mainstream media falsely reported it as FDA approval.
Barnes keep saying in every mandate related talk, that there is a sleight of hand going on related to “FDA-approved” claims.
IUC FDA actually granted full approval to one specific vaccine. I was lazy to look at specifics, but possibly that one is not even on the market. And even if it is, it gets only a small slice, while all the rest are just go with the emergency approval.
Meanwhile the popular rhetoric just keep sayin stuff like the vaxx is safe, fda approved and etc. And very few counter-claims get focus.
It states they approved it here: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine
The EUA was extended for use with unapproved populations and boosters for which the vaccine is also not approved for.