Whoopi Goldberg, co-host of ‘The View‘, issues a warning to Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas after his concurring opinion in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. The Dobbs case, that overturned Roe v. Wade and Casey v. Planned Parenthood, sending the abortion issue back to state legislatures, inflamed the former comic actor.
But who’s the “they” Whoopi says might “come for” Thomas.
You may read the Dobbs decision below.
Right Angle covers the news of the day in the context of enduring conservative values, thanks to our Members who fund its free distribution to many people who don’t hear this message elsewhere. Join us by clicking the big green button above. Special thanks to Alfonzo Rachel for sitting in for Bill Whittle this week. Catch Zo and Bill twice weekly in The Virtue Signal.
Listen to the Audio Version
Read Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Powered By EmbedPress
17 replies on “After Dobbs, Whoopi Warns Clarence Thomas, “You Better Hope That They Don’t Come for You Next””
She’s probably talking about the 3/5ths compromise — which turns out to have had the OPPOSITE intent as Critical Theory interprets it.
“Everything is on the menu. … Affirmative action …”
Walter Williams, a brilliant economist and follower of Malcolm X, agreed with Malcolm X that affirmative action was a bad idea. X thought that it defines one race as “less than” and sets up failure at the same time, both predictions coming true. For every one “lifted up” we have a dozen Kamala Harrises.
As I’ve mentioned before, “Clarence Thomas. created equal” is a very entertaining biographical film and if you don’t respect and admire him after watching it you are a dunce.
I thought her name was Poopi Goldiaper? She (I think) never has made any sense since the “Next Generation”; she continues to load her diaper every time she gets a camera in her face.
One of the most hypocritical points of the whole abortion argument is the fact that these are the same snivelers who called Vietnam veterans ‘baby killers’ when they return home. Who are the REAL baby killers?
Zo’s comment that “they” is the language of Legion is absolutely and BRILLIANTLY TRUE. Politically correct spiritual Neville Chamberlains probably don’t like it,… which makes it all the more proper to declare it! There’s nothing loving about withholding the Truth from those who need it most.
Can you imagine the makeup of SCOTUS if Hillary had successfully stolen 2016?…Say it with me…Supreme Court Justice Merrick Garland.
Vaccine mandates through every federal agency would be in full force due to Hillary selecting three leftist justices instead of Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett whom President Trump had the pleasure of appointing.
Let that one sink in.
These leftists control the DOJ, FBI, the intel agencies and the military brass, so they don’t fear the consequences of threatening anyone even a Supreme Court justice or past POTUS. Whoopi and the rest of their unaccomplished minions are loving their unearned day in the sun. They also realize they can’t do it on their own and so react violently whenever the power that fuels their ego is threatened.
Just thank God we caught this early enough to do something about it peacefully at the ballot box as America comes together to ensure election integrity for 2022 and beyond.
You guys are missing the point. The communists seeking global control…the Democrats, the RINO’s, their fellow globalists around the world…don’t care about lying to us or that Whoopi Goldberg, AOC speaking to Jake Tapper or the rest of their useful idiots or useful ignorants—unaware vs. the stupidity of the idiots—lie, threaten and intimidate for votes or power. As long as they are centralizing power, by any means necessary is a matter of course including hypocrisy. Truth, logic and reason aren’t even considered. They know they’re lying. They know that we know that they’re lying. And they don’t care. (exact quote by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn below).
“We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, but they are still lying.”
– Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
If we still had a workable, reliable FBI — Someone from that agency would have a quiet conversation with Whoopi regarding intimidating, threatening and inciting violence against a sitting judge. Scott says “she’s not threatening Judge Thomas” and I beg to differ. She essentially said “Nice life you have there, be a shame if something happened to it.”
I don’t think Whoopi should be arrested and I’m not sure she went far enough to get arrested and charged in any case. But she’s walking a very thin line saying something like that on national TV and someone needs to point that out to her. For her own good. In exactly the same spirit that Scott says Whoopi is “concerned” about Judge Thomas’ welfare.
Because if she keeps talking like that eventually someone is going to come for her. With a badge and a gun and a pair of handcuffs.
This situation abides under the same principle as shouting “Fire” in a crowded theater. The idea being that people will be trampled, injured or even killed trying to escape from a non-existent fire. That’s the example often given of an exception to Free Speech but it’s not really accurate. Because there isn’t really any exception to Free Speech. If there were then all anyone would have to do is craft a “reasonable” exception and codify it into law.
While there may not be any exception to Free Speech, there are likewise no exemptions from the consequences of what you say. If you speak unwisely then your own words can hurt you. If you shout “Fire!” in a crowded theater and people are injured or worse, you’re liable for what you said because what you said had consequences that any reasonable person could have anticipated — No one would yell something like that when there is no fire … Except in malice.
It’s not the speech that’s prohibited, but if you speak unwisely enough there can be consequences to face. If Whoopi isn’t careful, she’s going to generate some of those consequences.
Democrats are in rebellion to the concept of inherent rights as mentioned in the Declaration of Independence.
“…the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them…”
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Scott did you say cackling or chatter
“Autocratic” is precisely the word, Scott. They don’t want democracy, they don’t want a republic. They want an autocracy with them in charge. However, there is one point I have to thoroughly disagree with:
“…your veiled threat against a sitting Supreme Court Justice would not be handled so lightly by the rest of the public if you had done the same thing with regard to a sitting President of the United States.”
Yes it would… if the President in question was a Republican. See the examples of George W. Bush and Donald Trump.
That is the common default state of humanity. Did you ever play “If I were king of the world” when you were a kid? If not, you weren’t a normal kid.
The problem is that the Left never grew up and still thinks that if they were the kings of the world, they could fix every problem and achieve Utopia. Which of course is ridiculous because if that could be done somewhere in 10,000 years of known human history someone would have done it.
When playing King of the World kids come up with things like “There would be unlimited ice cream for free” and “There would be no more bed times or homework”. This is exactly the same attitude, with the same attendant disastrous results, from aged women on The View playing King of the World … badly.
*Yawn* Those harpies at The View’s only redeeming quality is being fun to mock
They are also good examples of
“It isn’t so much that liberals are ignorant. Its just that they know so many things that aren’t so.”
Ronnie’s humor never gets old because it’s still as valid today as it was the day he said it.