I highly doubt Musk simply screwed up. There is no way in hell that Elon Musk did not know that former FBI attorney James Baker was general counsel at Twitter or that any of his attorneys didn’t pick up on this fact. Baker would have been one of their main contacts (and probably on the letterhead and/or distribution list for the transaction) when Musk and his attorneys were performing the due diligence to purchase Twitter. … My guess is the deep state finally realized they couldn’t prevent Musk from buying Twitter without a huge lawsuit being filed by the shareholders since Musk was offering a great price. So they told him we’ll let you buy it as long as we can control what’s released. Otherwise, we’ll cut off lending to Tesla, SpaceX, audit your finances, crawl up your behind at Neuralink and anything else we can conjure up to make your life miserably while your business grinds to a halt and your bank account is drained by legal fees.
So now instead of full transparency to a range of journalists including Miranda Devine, Glenn Greenwald and others, we get this garbage release in bits and pieces to two lefty establishment journalists from _Rolling Stone_ (Matt Taibbi) and “The New York Times” and we’ll never know the full story about anything.
On top of that, they did their first release at the end of a news cycle (last Friday) and the second near the end of a news cycle (Thursday) and all AFTER THE MIDTERMS. Purchase date was October 27, 2022. Midterms were November 8, 2022.
If you’re looking to stick it to the globalists represented by the Democrats and RINO’s, you don’t wait until after the midterms so they can achieve their desired outcome with more rigging as in Maricopa and other places. Walker lost 20,000 votes off his total in Georgia on the 8th. Heaven knows what else they did and where.
9 replies on “Elon Musk Had To Know Former FBI Agent James Baker Was General Counsel at Twitter”
You are missing a key part of the strategy and its far bigger than Elon Musk and Twitter. How do you find out where the deep state players hide their communications and their records? You have an obvious deep state player like James Baker, a deep state player on plain sight, you leave him in place thinking you have accidently missed him. You feed him a bunch of information and see where he hides it.
Musk and others have people, whistleblowers inside Twitter, and white hat hackers that have shown up on his new twitter team. They will have tracked Baker’s every move. The stuff they have released will be only the tip of the ice burg. The left are dangerous and evil but they are also predictable morons. Manipulating them to give a treasure trove of evidence is easy. That evidence can be handed over to the Republican congress and State Governors who are ready to act.
Also remember you still have a senate seat up for grabs. Kari Lake is going all the way to the supreme court with her Arizona election fraud evidence. I don’t think SCOTUS will fail, the stakes are too high. The Republican states have already put the chief Justice on notice that if it fails its duty then there is no point Republican states recognizing its verdicts. If Lake is successful there may be a new vote for the Arizona senate seat. That’s 51 Senators.
If they can nail down the deep states communications and either block it or bug it then they will have more than enough to go after Biden and his staff as well as the DOJ and media players.
Agreed. I think it was a setup.
Hey there Julieann. Please see my response above. Let me know your thoughts.
Would also appreciate your opinion on my latest blog post. I think the globalists are using Ukraine as a victim group to grab power but the CCP will doubl-ecross everyone in the end.
God bless you and yours! Merry Christmas!!!
Oh, I could write a novel on what I think about what is happening in Ukraine.
I think you’re both right and historical evidence indicates it’s not wise to underestimate Elon Musk.
Part of the problem people on the Right are having in regards to Musk is that just because he did something we wanted him to do does not mean he’s on our side. He’s not. He’s on his own side and Elon Musk is far, far from anything that could be considered a Conservative in ideology. We cannot and should not expect him to be anything like an ideologically pure Conservative.
So when you see nominal Conservatives condemning Elon Musk because he doesn’t blah, blah, blah … That’s just foolishness and an inability to grasp the real situation. It’s magical thinking to view Elon Musk as though he were some sort of born again Conservative then slag on him because he’s not doing every single thing Conservatives might want him to do.
That said, Elon Musk may or may not come around to a Conservative viewpoint. Someday.
Not everyone who is not a Conservative despises our Constitutional Republic. Elon Musk, in championing free speech even if he doesn’t get every other point correct, is good enough for now. It’s a start.
We need to take the win and be glad of it, Musk is incontrovertibly an improvement over what previously went on in Twitter. The proof that’s so is all the media attacks on him since he bought that company. He’s doing real damage to the Left and that’s always a plus.
It’s ridiculous and naive to condemn him for being who he is. If you want to make sure Elon Musk never becomes a Conservative that’s a good way to go about it.
Personally I don’t care if Elon Musk kept Baker on as a move in some sort of three-dimensional chess strategy or he just simply overlooked Baker by accident or even by neglect. Musk buying Twitter and moving to expose the perfidy there is a net win either way.
There is no doubt whatsoever that Musk is not a conservative. He’s an old school liberal that still believes in free speech. There are things he does I like, but there are a lot of things he does that I don’t.
You’re right in saying Musk is an old school or ‘classic’ liberal and that’s not such a bad thing. We can work with people like that, we can’t work with the current crop of wokenistas at all.
Regarding Elon Musk and politics it would be a net gain if his political views pulled a significant number of those people who are adhering to Leftist Social Marxism simply because it’s the only other real alternative to Conservatism — Back towards the center with classic old school Liberalism.
We don’t all have to agree on policy and procedure, what we need is for the other side of the aisle to come back to doing what is actually good for America in a reasonable viewpoint. Right now it’s us trying to save America and it’s them trying to destroy America. We are never going to get a complete win for our side, if we can get the other side just to agree that America and American principles are good and worthy goals then that’s probably as close to a genuine win as we can hope for.
What I’m saying is that Elon Musk is mostly on the other side of politics from us but his views are policies we can work with. Like Free Speech for example. Policies we can work with would be a very good thing for this nation as a whole so Elon needs to be encouraged not slagged on for not being a genuine ‘Conservative’ with a capital “C”.
Interesting theory. I don’t think Musk is that prescient. Still sees global warming as a problem and not sure he’s made the climate hoax for control connection.
Having said that, his moves in purchasing Twitter do seen to indicate he thinks ahead. Put them in the box of having their investors sue for malfeasance or accept his high-priced offer.
I suspect the deep state realized they were in a box and put the screws to Musk. Despite all of their leverage over him through banking and the private markets, they couldn’t very well force him to withdraw immediately publicly without raising questions. Already tried and succeeded once with Tesla on another matter. Second time would have been pushing their luck (though the deep state is desperate and more sloppy these days).
So I think they settled on a reveal after the midterns with controlled release of info knowing they still had Baker on the inside.
I like your strategy, but while the Feds may not have hid/encrypted comms back to base prior to the Musk purchase out of overconfidence, I doubt they would have been so reckless afterward. Maybe so though. That Peter Strzok grin was telling.
Not sure feeding them a poison info pill would have done much good, but hard to say. I’m continually surprised by their arrogance and brazenness.
Would appreciate your opinion on my latest blog post. I think the globalists are using Ukraine as a victim group to grab power but the CCP will doublecross everyone in the end.
God bless you and yours! Merry Christmas!!!
I think Elon’s share sales were about him realizing the climate change thing is a scam but he still needs EV’s for Mars. I think Trump is behind what Elon’s doing and its a far bigger operation than just Twitter. I disagree on Strzok his evil smile is a nervous tell. He is very afraid.
I think Ukraine’s situation is wrecking the globalists. They’re forced reverse all their plans. Reactivating nuclear and coal plants; reopening coal mines; telling EV user they can’t charge their cars; rebuilding the military in a dozen countries; supporting Zelenskyy who supported Trump in both impeachments. They are fracking gas and locking up the greens that protest the site.
By mandating that no fighting age man leaves the country Zelenskyy locked the guys that provoked Russia in the country so they had to get their mates in Europe and America to help essentially implement the plan for the war that Zelenskyy and Trump’s people had worked out.
Russia destroyed 150% of the Ukrainian helicopters, 90% of the planes and most of the air defenses because all the relevant decoys in the west were that week in Ukraine. Trainloads of inflatable tanks and BMP’s. Its still fairly on course for a Ukrainian victory.
We are already bankrupt so don’t worry about that. Trump talked about gold a lot and got the laws though to do a real debt reset. There are also indicators that Putin is bluffing about nuclear weapons. There are indications that their warheads are all defunct.