I am looking for a (news?) channel online that provides the following:
1. Full hearings in Pennsylvania and Georgia on election fraud
2. Ongoing analysis of how many/which states Trump needs to flip or at least deny to Biden, either to win outright or to throw it to the U. S. House.
I can’t find these on the websites or the youtube channels of Newsmax or OAN, for examp. (They apparently carried the hearings live but they don’t have the full videos posted.) Do they have video repositories at other websites?
I’m also interested in collecting links to duplicate channels on some of the newer alternative sites, like Bill is creating.
I offer one link of my own, to a new youtube replacement platform, but it is traditional Catholic and so probably not for everyone.
(Also, not much there yet, but I’m not sure if they’re allowing user uploads yet.)
17 replies on “Request for links”
Thanks for asking. It got ME moving; I’ve had the same question. I happened on the MI House Oversight Committee hearing last night on OANN and watched the whole thing. I found it riveting!
Not a news channel as such, but I was just pointed to this today, and thought you’d find it useful as well.
https://hereistheevidence.com/
Whew. Maybe the last one: https://www.theepochtimes.com/live
Thank you for all the links, Deborah!
You are most welcome. (I’ve been wanting to find same.) Any luck?
The live streams seem to be coming from NTD TV: https://www.youtube.com/user/NTDTV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KZ9KM0OFzQ
“Trump team hits back after Barr says no widespread fraud; Witness saw identical Biden military votes” “Started streaming 14 minutes ago” “36,288 watching now”
Also, from same email, “Donald J Trump.”
https://www.youtube.com/Donaldtrump/videos.
Try “Right Side Broadcast Network” on youtube.com. I happened across the link in an email from a local meetup.com group (Bay Area Conservatives). I’m looking at “LIVE: Michigan State Senate Committee on Oversight Holds Hearing on Election Issues 12/1/20.” Too soon to comment. Let me know what you think!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0-vyw9qbdw
I searched (DuckDuckGo – not Google) for “election fraud hearings” and this link to the Pennsylvania one came up on the first page:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?478422-1/president-trump-tells-pennsylvania-gop-lawmakers-election-rigged-overturned
I didn’t see any reference to the Georgia hearing, however.
Thanks! I thought I had searched at c-span. They probably removed it from their search results (as well as their pages showing what happened on a given day).
This may be why it’s kind of hard to find reliable information on what’s really going on:
https://www.oann.com/twitter-bans-pa-state-sen-doug-mastriano-after-hearing-on-voter-fraud/
I don’t have links to the videos, but I can cobble together my own electoral vote analysis based on existing data. I’ve kind of been obssessing over it for some reason the past few weeks.
Most sites show Biden at 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232.
The following states (with their electoral votes) are the ones being contested
Arizona (11)
Georgia (16)
Michigan (16)
Nevada (6)
Pennsylvania (20)
Wisconsin (10)
If the goal is to bring Biden to at least 269 electoral votes by simply invalidating them to remove them so that no candidate has enough votes and the vote goes to the House, then that requires removing 37 votes from Biden.
So least number of states to remove to get there would be 3: Pennsylvania, Georgia or Michigan, and one other state.
Any three states not including Nevada will also get to the target number of 269 or fewer for Biden. For example, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Michigan or Georgia would total 37.
If Nevada is one of the states that has its votes removed and Pennsylvania is not one of the others, then the total number of states to invalidate is 4. Any combination of 4 of the 6 states’ electoral votes will get there.
The above assumes that either the electoral votes are simply not counted and neither candidate gets above 270.
If only some of the votes flip to Trump and the others are invalidated (say, for example, Pennsylvania flips and Wisconsin and Michigan are invalidated), we have the same lists as for all of them being invalidated, as it would bring Biden below 270, but not bring Trump to 270 or more.
If the votes all flip to Trump, we have a couple of scenarios.
First, if three states are flipped and they go from Biden to Trump, but those three states are Michigan or Georgia along with Wisconsin and Arizona, then both candidates have 269 electoral votes, and the vote goes to the House.
Trump wins the electoral vote if any four states flip.
If only three states flip, and we exclude Nevada, then as long as two of the three aren’t Wisconsin and Arizona, Trump gets more than 270 votes.
If only three states flip and one of them is Nevada, one of the other two has to be Pennsylvania. Conversely, if three states flip and one of them is Pennsylvania, it doesn’t matter which the other two are.
Lastly for Trump to carry the popular vote as well as the electoral vote (based on current totals), either 6,243,816 votes have to be thrown out as fraudulent, which would give Trump the popular vote by 1, or 3,121,908 votes would have to flip to Trump which would also give him the popular vote by 1. Not that the popular vote matters in the presidential election except that it would shut up the people who whine about it.
Hope that’s helpful.
Wow, great work!! Thank you!
You’re welcome!
As an addendum (which isn’t really part of a technical analysis but is worth considering), my hope is that if Trump manages to win enough suits to win reelection, that the lawyers going after these 6 states will look into the other 44. I would be willing to bet they would find irregularities with the vote even in red states like Texas, and it wouldn’t surprise me at all to see Virginia and Minnesota be flipped if they were investigated, along with the one Nebraska district who went for Biden, although the Republican won the House seat. I think they could easily uncover enough fraudulent votes nationwide to easily give Trump the popular vote as well.
And it’s an outside chance, but there might be enough issues in New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Colorado and New Mexico that those states’ electoral votes could have flipped to Trump. Not that any of those are worth contesting right now, but if Trump wins and can push election reform, then those would be cases worth considering as part of the reason to push for election reform.
I know that’s on Sidney Powell’s agenda. I want all of the electronic systems gone, everywhere. I am reasonably sure that the “non-Dominion” systems we have in Texas (which rejected Dominion) are Smartmatic, which means they are using the same underlying software. I don’t understand all the details but I think they both have the same origin. It is the large/urban blue counties which use these electronic systems, often exclusively (i.e., no optional paper ballot).
I have never trusted these voting machines. If it’s a computer, it runs on code. If it runs on code, the code can be altered. I think we should propose a constitutional amendment to prevent their use and mail-in ballots and early voting while we’re at it.
Damn skippy! Travis County (People’s Democratic Republic of Austin) Is bound to be more illegal than not!