[Part 2 of 2] House Democrats want to revise the doctrine of “qualified immunity” enjoyed by police, making it easier for members of the public to sue cops and police departments. The Republican Senate bill — the JUSTICE acted introduced by Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) — would make lynching a federal hate crime. Bill Whittle’s thoughts on both may surprise you.
Bill Whittle Now with Scott Ott is a production of our Members. Have you joined us yet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGD1TTpGr0w
Join the Rebellion
Listen to the Audio Version
Bill Whittle Network · Police Reform Dem vs. GOP Style: Make Suing Cops Easier, Make Lynching a Hate Crime
12 replies on “Police Reform Dem vs. GOP Style: Make Suing Cops Easier, Make Lynching a Hate Crime [Pt. 2]”
I just want to take issue with Scott about a comment that he made on this segment which I’m deeply offended by. I’m sick of people referring to White Nationalist as being bigoted. First of all I loathe the term White. Since this country is bent on putting people in a box, I’m an American of Northern European descent, but that’s not my issue. There is a huge difference between a Nationalist and a Supremacist. I am White and I am a Nationalist but that does not make me a bigot. Supremacist on the other hand are of the Third Reich gene pool which I also loathe.
My wife is an American of African, German, and Native American descent. We are Patriots and she is my soul-mate. She is married to a White Nationalist. I’m a Christian first, a husband, and a Patriot. Bigot has never fit into my agenda.
Now Scott, let’s look at those in the BLM movement. This organization is filled with bigots. Black Supremacist if you will.
I make this distinction because as a White Nationalist, I defend my heritage in that we have nothing to apologize for, but that does not make me a bigot.
Bill mentioned crime statistics. This is something that I’ve looked at for quite sometime. It’s something that I’m familiar with because of my background. Does that make me a bigot? No! The crime stat numbers go against the narrative being pushed about racism.
Would you all like to hit the ball out of the park? Do a show on why the crime is so high in the Black community. The decimation of the family. The absence of Fathers. Roe v. Wade. Finally the most devastating event in this community, all communities actually, is the removal of God from the public square. The latter is something the Founders would have railed against.
I’m no bigot and wife can attest to that. I’m proud of my Irish, Scottish, and German heritage. All those backgrounds happen to be Caucasian, but that does not make me a bigot.
Hate crimes are another fraud to keep up the insufferable blaming that the leftists use against us and our country. These festering “hate crime” minds are seeking overwhelming control over and submission from all of us.
If lynching is classified as a hate crime, antifa and all the anarchists will be planning lots more lynchings because they sure as heck want to destroy our bonds with each other. NO! I’m not having any of it. Thanks to Bill for clear thinking!
The message projected by these self-righteous, virtue-signaling SJWs elected by the popular majority is that any act of hatred is sacrilege. But, by their standard, do you know who else is guilty of hate? Yahweh, supreme being and Creator of heaven and earth. Scripture records many instances of God’s hatred:
Deu 12:31 “Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods.”
Malachi 1:3 “And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.”
Mal 2:16 “For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously.”
ICor 6:9-10 “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.”
God’s hate is righteous, but evil men have reclassified many behaviors as “normal” that were once an abomination to God, and to say so now is a “hate crime”. This is thought control.
The answer is simple. The way to “reduce the incidences of police brutality” is to be polite and compliant when detained by the police. Case closed. Not. Our Constitution has no power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Therefore, the police will be disbanded and replaced by antifa thugs.
Hate crime laws are a weapon, as Bill said. They are so broad, that just looking at someone could be construed a hate crime. If the justice system wasn’t broken, the deterrent factor alone would reduce the number of crimes.
Simply put hate is an emotion, it’s not a crime by itself . A crime is a crime regardless of the motivation. What if I said , I love my wife , I really want to make sure she goes to heaven so I’m going to kill her. Would that rate a lesser punishment?
One aspect of “hate” crime laws has the effect of accusing an entire demographic of the same presumed motivations as the offender even though they haven’t done any such crime. Example, white cop kills black man, therefore all white cops and indeed white folks hate blacks and are systemically racist. Man beats up a woman, therefore all men are violent thugs that hate women. They just haven’t acted it out yet.
As soon as it was seen that a white cop knelt on a black man, it was universally proclaimed a hate crime. Just judging the motivations by the race of the cop and suspect is racist. We have largely bought into the narrative that you are guilty by group membership, not your individual values and actions.
Further, cops are systemically racist, even the black cops who are no longer considered black. The stats objectively show that white cops use less excessive force on blacks than black cops use on black suspects. They obviously can’t be black. Facts are stubborn if you care to pay any careful attention to them.
Hate crime laws are indeed to increase racial stereotypes and division. To divide us by group identity and increase tensions.
This is the first time I have found the Comments / Discussion area on BW and I am not try to make any point other than I appreciated the article and will be looking around to see if I will want participate any further.
You have to be logged in as a member of BW in order to even see the comments, not to mention actually commenting yourself.
I was just thinking to myself this morning, I love BW member comments and blogs because although we sometimes have very vigorous debates and discussions where we ‘agree to disagree’, there’s precious little trolling.
A couple months ago, there appeared to be a troll on BW, but he was only trolling 1 specific member (as I recall, somewhat imperfectly, I only remember the activity, not the actor). At the time, I thought about the troll vs the other member and made my own judgement, and moved on. I believe the troll has disappeared, I haven’t seen activity of this sort in months.
BTW, you have to be a paying member to comment… even trolling is not free!
Thank you for saying what I’ve always thought. You don’t hurt or kill someone because you like or love them, that’s always an action of hate. And how does society or a jury read the mind of a perpetrator and see if it was racial or just plain evil? And does that make the victim less dead? Or can you exact more punishment on the perpetrator? Can you give them 2 death penalties? Hate crimes are foolish.
“Hate crimes” never made sense to me. It addresses a political agenda and “feelings” or mental state rather than an action or crime. I love and agree with Bill’s statement that it elevates an identified “victim” group and that is wrong.
Bill is exactly correct on this. Being in law enforcement when this started, “Hate” crime designations were the beginning of the now overbearing “victim” mentality. Treat everyone exactly equal under the law and sentence as such and then there will be less perception of unequal treatment.
I’ve often thought defining things as hate crimes is silly. Bill has excellent points as to that. But here are examples. A synagogue is burned down by an anti-Semitic but leaves nothing indicating that. How can you tell? It may have been a pyromaniac who just chose a synagogue at random. It could have been a Jewish congrangant who had a beef. A gay man is killed by a homophobe. How is that different than a gay man being killed by another gay man because the man killed would not have sex with the killer? Hello Pandora’s box.