What happens to a country when a segment of the population no longer trusts the morality and actions of its leading domestic law enforcement agency? While the FBI has long raised concerns about its tactics, today we have an increasingly vocal opposition to The Bureau arising from the political party that has historically treasured its ‘law and order’ plank.
Bill Whittle takes it even further: “They are now the enemy of everything I believe in.”
Do we need to abolish the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and start clean? Or will any government entity ultimately fall into corruption?
The Virtue Signal comes to you twice weekly thanks to the supporters we call our Members. Membership has its privileges — like Backstage content, access to the Member-written blog, forums and comments — but not folks join because they want to expand the reach of a message they’re not hearing enough elsewhere. To join, tap the big green button above.
9 replies on “Stinking Badges: “They Are Now the Enemy of Everything I Believe In””
My pipe dream would be instituting a formal anti-government police force.
Somewhere in the days before the PATRIOT Act, when there was less inter-agency communication, there’s fodder for a hilarious series of dark comedies about various undercover feds trying to entrap each other.
Hoover and the FBI have always been corrupt. They were just good at hiding it from the American people.
Sending illegals to Martha’s Vineyard and DC and Chicago is being classified as stunts by the MSM and leftist talking heads. I call it long over-due chutzpah. Every red state that has illegals dumped on them need governors who have the balls to do exactly what De Santis and Abbot are doing – send them by bus to a sanctuary state. Give these hypocrites a taste of the medicine they want to force down our throats. Not that they’ll get the message, but their reactions certainly illustrate exactly how disgusting they are.
The way you 2 (Bill and Zoe) pussyfoot around the issue is disturbing to me. If you can’t get rid of bad actors by passing laws, if you can’t get rid of same by social shame, then…you use force. George Washington would have no problem figuring this out. Abraham Lincoln, ditto. FDR, ditto. Pick a President you respect, and emulate what he did. Duh.
There is a Heritage Foundation web cast this afternoon at 5pm that may have some value vs. this discussion? And if you miss it today, they may have a link to the episode later on.
… registering to attend Fighting to Protect the Constitution: What Are the Threats and How Do We Fight Back?. We’re delighted you’ll be joining us online!
Additional details for the event can be found below:
Fighting to Protect the Constitution: What Are the Threats and How Do We Fight Back?
September 19, 2022 | Add to Your Calendar
Virtual Event: Click here to access the event at 5:00 pm ET on Monday, September 19. Please note: If you do not see the livestream video at 5:00 pm, please refresh your browser window.
Click here for program and speaker details .
Sincerely, Heritage Events
It never crossed my mind that the FBI would be so anti-American Constitution, anti-American form of government, and anti-fact. It never crossed my mind they would misrepresent something like the fabricated Russian dossier on Trump in order to get rid of an elected President. It continues to wreak of stench while they flail around defending their actions. No wonder it is so difficult to “drain the swamp” when the FBI is an agent not merely of the State, but of the Democratic Party.
Which Conservative groups has Project Veritas hit? I’m not saying you’re wrong, just can’t remember any off the top of my head
Sorry, Zo. That positive/negative charge analogy does not logically compute — specifically, there is no way to “re-polarize” the negativity of the Democrat policies in such a way that they are positively-charged to stick to the negative Democrats. This is a convoluted metaphor that does not work. The analogy of fighting fire with fire is more apropos in that we must turn the destructive flames of the Democrat policies back on themselves to prevent further societal destruction. As you often say, the Republican Party is generally filled with weak leadership, and that must change — better sooner than later.