The Republican National Convention invited Mark McCloskey to speak after he and his wife Patricia stirred national controversy by brandishing firearms before a Black Lives Matter crowd that broke down his neighborhood gate. McCloskey has donated to both parties over the years, but supports racial justice and police reform, and has represented at least one law client in a case against police brutality.
Right Angle with Bill Whittle, Stephen Green and Scott Ott is a production of our Members. Join us today.
Listen to the Audio Version
Bill Whittle Network ยท Castle Doctrine Duo: RNC Spotlights Home Defenders Mark and Patricia McCloskey
8 replies on “Castle Doctrine Duo: RNC Spotlights Home Defenders Mark and Patricia McCloskey”
A few marxists have a harmless house burning excursion and these racist, bigots have to ruin it with malicious self-preservation. It’s hard to believe that this kind of thoughtless natural reaction still exists despite all of the Democrat dehumanizing we receive from the American educational system.
We still have a lot of work to do in this country. Thanks to countless Democrat governors, none of that work will be the evil work of earning money and saving our economy!
I hope they do what you and Scott suggest Bill in their speech.
One thing I’ve said to a couple people after the (local to me) Kenosha fires was that just because someone else has lost something and just because it is property that can be rebuilt, that doesn’t give you a right to burn it.
I have seen, from other cities, black business owner asking the rhetorical “what about me? Does my black life matter?” in front of a destroyed storefront. With the pullback of democrat politicians they might be getting their own “mugged” moment and wondering if this is their reward for backing the party for all of their lives.
As they are (or he is) lawyers, they possibly knew how far they could take their stance legally. That may have given them some confidence, but I read somewhere that they are now taking additional classes/ sessions in using their weapons because they were not really comfortable brandishing them as pictured.
Interesting to note that since he is left handed and she is right handed, they in fact to a pretty good job of covering their potential field of fire.
Scott’s response about a force multiplier needs to be taken as a snippet and put out separately. This is precisely the reason firearms work as defensive weapons.
Also, I wonder if they had a doorbell camera and are just waiting on court to show it.
I hate to tell Bill, but I recently saw a a video where the McCluskys themselves said they were Republican, but donated to some friends who ran as Demacrats. Cannot find it now. It does not change the fact that they were savaged, and that Bill is probably right that the left is upset that brandishing the weapons worked.
It was an interview with Michael Knowles. Mark said they were life-long republicans and that he believed BLM was a terrorist organization. Here’s the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDdEm_iAKos&ab_channel=MichaelKnowles
Thank you!