Zo comes in with a story about how a popular video game called ‘The Sims’ now allows you to chose a character with post-transgender scars, among other assaults on not just common sense but assaults on the very idea of reality. This is an attempt to destroy NORMAL, and NORMAL is, essentially, trial-and-error rules for maximum human happiness. If you are going to invert society, the entire idea of ‘normal’ has to first be destroyed.
Bill Whittle and Alfonzo Rachel create two new episodes of The Virtue Signal each week fueled by our Members, who make monthly or annual contributions starting at as little as $9.95/month. In addition to becoming true producers of these, and many other, shows, they unlock access to backstage content, forums, comments and our Member-written blog. We always offer a full-rapid and cheerful refund if you don’t love your new conservative friends within 30 days. Test drive Membership today when you click the big green button above. A lot of our Members make additional contributions to the mission using the big blue button, which allows you to give with credit card or PayPal in any amount you choose.
15 replies on “Destroying Normal”
One observation that I’d add is that homosexuals insisted at the end of the 1980s that nobody call them “queer” anymore, but then they started calling themselves Queer. Then they made the word “fag” illegal too, ostensibly to eliminate denigration of people based on sexual preference. Then they replaced “sexual preference” with “gender.” Then they invented the slur “cis” which is a way for gay people to call straight people fags.
Very informative.
For years the psychology community has railed against the notion of “normal”.
“What is normal?” would be their question.
Nowadays, we realize that “normal” is relative to social norms. So, when we acquiesce to something outside the social norms, we “normalize” the aberrant.
Thus, when we normalize the freak, we get a freak show. (They’ve got to strut their stuff.) If we feel upset or “dirty” because of it, perhaps we ought to reconsider the freak to be a freak?
Good rant Alphonso. You’re right. Homosexuality was the gateway drug. Assuming people can be born with same gender attraction, we’re all born attracted to people we’re not supposed to have sex with. Homosexuals were the first to identify with their sin instead of call it what it is, a sin. Strait people don’t identify as fornication prone. Sexuality serves a purpose defined by God to unify a man and a woman and to produce offspring to be raised by their parents who are unified through their sexuality.
I think Rumble is fixed, so when you get a chance, please upload it. I could rip it from The BeastTube, but then no one gets view credit.
The D’s need to be further qualified as communist, oligarchs, and tyrants, because a huge proportion of the voting public does not associate D with any of those terms when, in fact, they should. It’s a matter of semantics and definitions. If D is a good term in the minds of its voters while those other adjectives are bad in the minds of the many of the same voters, then the word associations must be made to educate those who are willing to be educated. Any failure to do so is leaving the field to the enemy.
I prefer the word “decent” to normal. I use it exactly the same way you’ve used the word “normal” because I’m a Boomer, and that’s what “normal” actually used to mean.
The left wing is completely nihilist. That is, the left consciously rejects both facts, reality, and all values. Since normal includes both recognition that facts come first, thinking begins and is only possible with with the primacy of reality, and the crucial merit of values to living a successful life, the left is eager to destroy ‘normal’. Hence the left will call the pursuit of excellence ‘racist’ and demand respect for miserable mediocrity and outright failure. As part of the left’s vicious attempts to establish a socialist police state in America, the left also hates and fears freedom and individual rights and is doing their violent best to destroy both.
Attack on normalcy?!?!? Who wants to be normal?
Of course you are right. It is an attack on Judeo-Christian morality and common sense.
I disagree with Zo about the nature of the conflict between Gays Against Groomer and Trans. It’s not nature vs. free will. Gay people can keep their kinks between like minded adults.
The criminals, perverts and traitors trying to steer society wanted a new Insecure Dependent Class that can’t survive on it’s own. So Trans people have been encouraged to adopt kinks that require the indulgence of unwilling participants to promote hostility. Promoting hostility generates a backlash that GAG doesn’t want to get caught up in.
Want to stump a progressive? Ask them this.
If trans-women are women, why do you need the prefix?
What purpose does it serve?
Nice discussion gents. And Bill is correct, this is where the battlespace is now. Posted this elsewhere, but Megyn Kelly had an interesting group of women on her podcast last week (Ep 529).
A middle-aged, lesbian woman who sought counseling for transitioning prior to that being the preferred option. Therapist basically said, why don’t we see what we can do to get you to love who you are as a butch, lesbian woman. She is now speaking out against “gender affirming” care.
Also, a 20 something who has now transitioned back to female after her experience was quite different. Started hormone therapy almost immediately. Her story is chilling in my mind.
And a current therapist who is speaking out against “gender affirming” care being the preferred route citing all of the potential, irreversible damage.
I thought they had a very lively discussion. Interesting that the three are pretty left-leaning, though at least one described herself as Red-Pilled.
Perfect stumping question. If you’re a woman, you’re a woman. Saying you’re a ‘trans woman’ is a way of saying you not a woman, but a ‘trans woman’. Then again, I’m not a biologist, but I am not sure there is such a thing as a woman anymore. To hell with tens of thousands of years of evolution and biology, and of course the precious science!
So no Rumble link? Mkay.
Why would this simple question get a negative reaction?
Rumble may have answered my question. Apparently they’ve been getting attacked relentlessly lately. Others are having trouble uploading today.