Listen to audio versions of all episodes of Right Angle and Bill Whittle Now on your podcast app, including Stitcher!
iTunes Podcast | Google Podcast | | SoundCloud | RSS Feed
Some 11,000 “experts” around the world say that it’s not enough to reduce fossil fuel burning, the climate emergency is here and we need to cut the number of people on the planet. But what do they recommend as a method of depopulation? Who decides which techniques we’ll use, on which people groups, to produce a less inhabited planet?
Access the full archive of Right Angle then connect with our vibrant community of conservatives in this private enclave when you become a Member.
29 replies on “Final Solution to Climate Change: 11,000 Climate “Experts” Demand Depopulation”
What I have found extremely comical that is actually drifting into deep space is that their ability to make PREDICTIONS whether about the Climate, Population, Economics Social Justice etc etc. have been a net Zero Percentage CORRECT. Every one of the “experts” claim to know exactly what will have in the future is NOTHING more than faulty Science and their opinion based on a myopic, delusional and very destructive IDEOLOGY.
These “experts” live in a Alternative Reality where the Collectivist mindset is continually reinforced on a 24/7 Loop that the Utopian vision within the Bubble will and can manufacture Paradise on Earth. Reality is always rejected and literally dismissed when it completely throws away the nonsense of the IDEOLOGY time after time after time.
At FrontPagemag.com, the banner headline reads INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT.
Paul M, below, (and a Canadian TV show I can’t find to link to) pointed out the fallacy of this 11,000 lie site. I have to say, although the arguments by our Right Angle trio were of course logical and elucidating as always, using THIS recent 11,000-referenced subject for a Right Angle discussion is giving it credibility it doesn’t deserve. If I didn’t know better, and I do, I would say the headline influenced Scott more than a headline should and normally does. I mean, it’s almost like using it as a straw man argument. The 11,000 is merely a number of “likes” as in Facebook; there are no experts or scientists in the mix at all; it’s merely an opinion piece masquerading as a report implying a (fake) scientific poll or agreement, and calling random readers scientists or experts. Scott introduced it for its sheer ineptness to segue into a more in-depth discussion, which is fair enough, but to me its incredibly fictional gravitas is the real story.
Fake news is getting very clever in our digital soup marketplace. Headlines are not only grabbing attention, they have replaced the need or reason for any following text.
Abbreviated missives by the millions flow through Twitter and in text message exchanges by the masses who, because they are consuming and demanding brief communications, also become addicted to partially or wholly believing the headlines they see. It is now easy to assume that climate catastrophe articles claiming some scientific unanimity are genuine attempts at fraud once again; this one isn’t even a genuine attempt. The subject is as virtual as the print on this screen.
So the solution to a mass extinction event is…mass extinction?
The Rebel did an excellent breakdown on this. The “Alliance of World Scientists” is a single page website. The 11,000 “scientists” consisted of anyone who clicked on the site – including trolls. https://www.bitchute.com/video/Vs3ZPGLPiss/
I love how Steve snuck in the 8 thousand or 11 thousand comment (ala Bill, from the Back Stage)!
I’ve posted this (and at least 1 other) to Facebook, that feature is very easy to do, thank you ‘webmaster’.
I wonder who are these 11,000 experts and what are they experts in? Are they accredited in the fields related to Global Warming, e.g. atmosphere, climate, meteorology? Or are they botanists, linguists, chemists, astrophysicists? If I have a severe health problem, such as cancer, would I go to an Economics wizard or Anthropologist for help?
“Final solution”? Do you mean THE Final Solution as attempted by our German friends a few decades ago? I hope not.
Yes, that’s what it means.
The Rebel did an excellent breakdown on this. The “Alliance of World Scientists” is a single page website. The 11,000 “scientists” consisted of anyone who clicked on the site – including trolls. https://www.bitchute.com/video/Vs3ZPGLPiss/
I got the analogy in the title for the video right away… very apt!
When I was a tyke, I was recruited into an organization called LTL, Loyal Temperance Legion. Its main mission was to train impressionable young minds of the evils of alcohol and memorize and recite a pledge to never let it pass their lips. Years later, I came to my senses and threw that indoctrination out the window. I enjoy a beer almost nightly and think about those 11,000 “experts” who kept their vow of abstinence and became self-control-challenged. They are undoubtedly the same people who would rob a person of their free will to procreate like rabbits, if they so choose. This is pure evil and the fact that so many people signed on to this monstrosity shows the extent of the delusion that God has put upon the people.
11,000 “experts”? What’s an expert? Some think it means a former pert.
Expert: ex – meaning one was or used to be. Spurt. Drip under pressure. Therefore, an expert is a has been drop under pressure.
I always said ex = “X” the unknown quantity and Spurt = a drip under pressure. So an Expert is an unknown drip under pressure. 🙂
An “Expert” is a “has-been spurt”!
wow, Scott, great ending!
I so enjoy your “devil’s advocate” role.
You are so good at it…maybe too good…
Scott – you nailed it better even than Bill and Steve combined! Superbly succinct
The world is not overpopulated. Sorry, but if you could bring the population of the world(7.7B people) to little ole’ Ohio (1.25T square feet), every person would have roughly a 12’x 12′ area to exist. Somewhat cramped but that’s everybody in the world in a tiny state like Ohio. The math doesn’t lie but C(lie)mate scientists do.
I will start respecting their opinion when they start acting on their convictions and show us the way by committing suicide. If they did, I would support giving them a wonderful sendoff: a cardboard box with a plastic jar to hold their ashes placed lovingly in the nearest trash dump. Then get on with my life as if they had never existed.
Among the 11,000 signatories are none other than Micky(sic) Mouse and Albus Dumbledore. Seriously, those were 2 of the names listed. Since reported, they scrubbed the list of 34 obvious fake names. Their credibility has always been suspect and this just adds to it.
The movie is “…things to come” — was awful! just sayin’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atwfWEKz00U
Curious, I’d never heard of Margaret Sanger until today and then she crops up twice in an afternoon. Two hours ago she appeared while I was researching a suffragette arson attack on a local racecourse in 1913 and then she’s mentioned in Right Angle. Cue the Twilight Zone music…
I believe Steve was talking about The Shape of Things to Come (1936). While Wells’ book was ahead of it’s time, the movie was truly terrible.
Do the 11000 experts support Thanos in the Marvel universe in removing 50% of the population of the universe? Seems like they might.
Steve NAILED it with his comment about putting the word “Social” in front of any other word. The other thing is, I will not be lectured about integrity by anybody who wants to take someone else’s innocent life for the “greater good or climate change or any other made up excuse” whether that life is walking the planet or still in their mothers womb. As far as I am concerned anybody who would suggest that needs to be the 1st to step up and we will see how it goes. These people are evil and dangerous and need to be exposed as such. Thank you guys.
That movie is “Things to Come”
If they only want to reduce population gradually, we can just choose the population growth model that says global population will begin cratering in about 30 years and call it job done.
Okay, watched the movie again. Probably again, I’m not sure if I’ve watched it all before or only seen clips. There are no air communists in it. It’s more along the lines of rule by a scientific, technocratic elite who champion progress and create a near paradise from the rubble. Some kind of benevolent oligarchic dictatorship is strongly implied. At the end they’re opposed by an ungrateful anti-progress mob led by a rabble rousing artist which ultimately fails.
It’s not great, but it’s not all that bad either.
Excellent closing statements, Scott!
The tyrannical eco-fanatics of the world will not be satisfied until all humans (except themselves) are dead and rotting. If such a “utopia” is achieved, then they will just turn on each other like the members of any other autocratic hegemony.