Categories
BW Member Blog

Hey, Steve. Watch the language, okay?

Keep rolling your eyes-6921c80b

 

I was dismayed today when Steve Green used a common but highly objectionable expletive five times.  The G…..D…. word is a bit of a shock to the system to committed Christians (It’s a commandment dude!) My wife, who watches with me wanted to turn off the episode and cancel our membership. I even saw Scott wince a little. I know Steve was angry and that word is commonly used to express extreme anger and I do understand that Steve is a bit of an agnostic so far as expletive use is concerned.

Scott never uses hard core cursing. Bill has used the G….D…. expletive sparingly, but it’s jarring for committed Christians when he does. Given the high number of Christians who are members of BillWhittle.com, I would suggest that the boys at least stay away from the more blasphemous naughty words. I’ve taken the liberty of providing some “alternative” cuss words, Steven might try some of these in deference to your Christian members. The facts you guys present are shocking enough. Please watch your language, okay.  Here are some things you can say instead.

  1. Shnookerdookies!
  2. Fudge nuggets!
  3. Cheese and rice!
  4. Sugar!
  5. God bless America!
  6. Poo!
  7. Snickerdoodle!
  8. Banana shenanigans!
  9. Six and two is eight!
  10. God bless it!
  11. Barbara Streisand!
  12. Fiddlesticks!
  13. Jiminy Crickets!
  14. Son of a gun!
  15. Egad!
  16. Great Scott!
  17. Caesar’s ghost!
  18. Merlin’s beard!
  19. Merlin’s pants!
  20. Shucks!
  21. Darn!
  22. Dagnabbit!
  23. Dang rabbit!
  24. Dadgummit!
  25. Jumpin’ Jiminy!
  26. Gee willickers!
  27. Gee whiz!
  28. Cheese whiz!
  29. Good night!
  30. Sam Hill!
  31. Son of a monkey!
  32. Son of a bucket!
  33. William Shatner!
  34. Son of a motherless goat!
  35. Judas Priest!
  36. Gosh darn it!
  37. Shut the front door!
  38. Holy cow!
  39. Horse pucky!
  40. Geez!
  41. Sufferin’ succotash!
  42. Son of a mother trucker!
  43. Fudge berries!
  44. Geez Terwilligers!
  45. Mothersmucker!
  46. Cornnuts!
  47. Poo on a stick!
  48. Aw, duck water!
  49. Jerk water!
  50. Dillweed!
  51. Great Googly Moogly
  52. Jumpin Jehosaphat
  53. Crud Muffin
  54. Cotton pickin’
  55. Pat Sajak
  56. Malarkey
  57. Bullshovic
  58. Wingnut
  59. Jackwagon
  60. Dad blast it
  61. Farfegnugen!

If you want to do some insulting, here are some creative alternatives:

“Your grades say marry rich, but your face says study harder.”
“You haven’t been yourself lately. We’ve all noticed the improvement.”
Straight from Shakespeare “I wish we could become better strangers”
“I don’t know why you’re playing hard to get when you’re so hard to want.”
“I envy people who haven’t met you.”
“You’re impossible to underestimate.”
“I hope the rest of your day is as pleasant as you are.”
“Whoever told you to be yourself simply couldn’t have given you worse advice.”
George Orwell quote about Stanley Baldwin: “He is simply a hole in the air.”
“You’re not pretty enough to be that dumb.”
“Nothing you have to say is of any consequence…to anyone.”
Winston Churchill: “In the morning I shall be sober, but you will still be ugly”
“I’ve been called worse things by better people.”
“That’s why everybody talks about you.”
“You are like the first piece of bread in a loaf. Everybody touches you but nobody wants you.”
“You’ll never be half the man your mother was.”
“There is nothing you can do that will make me think less of you.”
“As an outsider, what is your perspective on intelligence?”
“I don’t have the time or the crayons to explain this to you right now.”
“You are the human equivalent of a participation award.”
“I have nothing but respect for you — and not much of that” – Groucho Marx
“It’s better for people to think you’re an idiot than open your mouth and prove them right.”
“You would struggle to pour water out of a boot, with the instructions on the heel.”
“You aren’t being the person Mr. Rogers wanted you to be.”

Please guys. You’d only have to limit a couple of words. Scott could ‘splain it to you. And you wouldn’t lose any members with tender sensibilities.

Thanks,
Tom King

 

 

 

37 replies on “Hey, Steve. Watch the language, okay?”

How about, “Cursed be this administration who doesn’t give one rat’s behind about the American people. To hell with them all.”?
Leaves God out of it, preserves the reverence of His name and communicates the same level of anger and frustration especially when uttered with the passion Steve demonstrated.
Having said that, I will say this. That would be my preference. However, I am not here to hold everyone else to my standard. First of all, I’m far from perfect. Second, I appreciate the fact that the guys keep it to a minimum. Third, I wouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater and ditch my membership. I understand that swearing is a common go-to to express higher levels of anger and frustration. If we stopped viewing or reading at the slightest infraction, there’s a lot of worthwhile content that we’d be excluding.
What I don’t like and don’t watch are the gratuitous swearing and violence in some entertainment. Furthermore, since the left has finished normalizing it there, they’ve moved on to normalization through reading materials in elementary schools which is the exact wrong direction. It’s base, boorish and unintelligent not to mention immoral. Christ teaches that our words reflect our heart, so why swear or insult people at all.
Dry Bar Comedy is a lot of fun. Haven’t tried out pureflix.com yet. “The Chosen” series was fantastic. I’m not entertained by gratuitous swearing, sarcasm, insults and sexual innuendo / activity. Doesn’t move my emotions in the least.
By contrast, just rewatched “Time to Kill.” Great movie. A swear word here and there but nothing dramatic. The white supremacists used the “n” word several times, but I guess the censors let that pass since the movie sort of pushes their agenda that America was full of racism as late as 1996 when the movie was made. What really gets you though is McConaughey’s final courtroom speech. Not a single swear word in it.
It’s just largely unnecessary unless the character, say a mob guy maybe, would swear gratuitously. Even then, it’s just making the character more authentic.
God bless you and your wife.

Sure, why not. I’ll jump in on this one. Tom King’s list reminded me of a very funny comedian, who happens to be a Christian, but talented and funny and one of his many bits is Alternative “Cuss” words. Just a short clip from Tim Hawkins comedy on YT , his take on Christian cursing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHGbKuZzq3E
And I share Stephen’s passion on this, and it’s time to get a lot heated. Can’t all be fun and games.
But for some actual fun, Tim Hawkins can’t be beat for extremely clean comedy. His Song “the Government Can” sung to the tune of The CandyMan is still a must watch every tax day.

Sure thing, Ned Flanders … I’m not a bit impressed with your false piety. Sorry.

Dennis Prager puts it well when he explains that —
“To take the name of the Lord in vain is to do evil and attribute it to God, or to do evil claiming God’s instruction or consent.”

(Ask me why people who use God as an excuse to unjustly kill, deprive, abuse or abase others disproves the “No true Scotsman” fallacy. It should be obvious after you read this comment but if you need to know more, ask.)

The phrase “God damn it” is not taking the Lord’s name in vain. For one thing, “God” is not a name it’s a title. Like “King”. His name is the Tetragrammaton not “God”. Jewish people often use the word “Hashem” in place of the word “God”. Hashem is also a title, it means “The Name”, it is not The Name itself. Non-Jewish people generally say “The Lord”, same kind of thing, same kind of results.

His Name is YHVH, the Tetragrammaton. If you read a Christian Bible where you see the words “The Lord” in italics that’s because the translators substituted that phrase for “YHVH”. This happens a lot in the Old Testament. Anyone claiming to be a Christian should be at least well educated enough in his Faith to know this much as it is a common mistake people make when trying to claim offense at the speech of others.

The truth of the matter is that “God damn”, “God damned” and “God damn it” etc. are all curses. Not “cursing” in the modern vernacular as applies to things like f-bombs and colloquial references to feces (the word “swearing” is also used in this capacity incorrectly), but actual curses meant to put a curse upon a thing or a person.

To say “God damn ___” is to call down damnation from the Creator of the Universe on a thing or person. Or to express the intent or desire to do the same.

If you said “The Lord curse you/it/them” it would mean exactly the same thing and also would not involve taking God’s name in vain … But most people who try to flaunt their empty piety wouldn’t think of taking offense at that.

If you’re a Christian you want to be careful with that kind of thing. Matthew 16:19 says “Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.“

Those are the actual words of Yeshua Hamashiach (Jesus Christ’s Hebrew Name) as spoken to the Apostles. Apostles or not, any professing Christian does well to take them to heart.

If you’re not a Christian then it’s nothing but an empty phrase demonstrating extreme disapproval or anger.

If you’re a Christian who claims to adhere to Biblical Principles, these are the only two ways to view utterances of this nature: Either as curse or expression of extreme disapproval. Full stop. There is no Biblical foundation for anything else.

Creating long lists of substitutions and acting all indignant is not a demonstration of your own piety. That’s nothing more than virtue signalling your own empty, meritless virtue the same as any Leftist would … or ignorance. Now you have no excuse for the latter and would do well to avoid the former. Because all you’re accomplishing is reflecting a bad light on Christians by making The Faith appear petty and judgemental.

Lastly, there are things in this world deserving of being cursed. The application of Steve’s language is strong but appropriate to the things he was cursing. Those things are indeed damnable.

As far as I’m concerned Mr. Tom King is doing the Right’s version of Political Correctness. As in —

“You said something that offends me over something I don’t even have any right to be offended by. I demand you modify your speech/behavior so that you don’t offend me and in demanding that I’m showing everyone how wonderful (or righteous) I am!”

I know I’m coming on strong with my comment above and I mean to do exactly that. This kind of thing makes me sick, no matter who’s doing it.

Loved this scene. Two dudes who have known each other for a long time, having a libation or three and pulling out their souls for truly honest inspection.

Sure thing, Ned Flanders …
*** first of all, I’d rather have a Ned Flanders in charge who fears repercussions from a higher power than someone obsessed with power who believes they can define morality (Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Kim Jong-un). Kim Jong-un, for instance, likes to sentence his detractors to death by Howitzer. He ties them to the end of the barrel and fires away in public for all to see.
=====
I’m not a bit impressed with your false piety. Sorry.
*** and your evidence of his insincerity is? Tom King is expressing an opinion and making a REQUEST, not a command as your other comment indicates, that It is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the commands issued by those demanding we be politically correct.
I don’t think Tom really cares whether you’re impressed or not.
=====
Dennis Prager puts it well when he explains that —
“To take the name of the Lord in vain is to do evil and attribute it to God, or to do evil claiming God’s instruction or consent.”
*** With all due respect to Dennis Prager, he’s wrong. Whenever you use God’s name in a manner for which it wasn’t intended, you’re taking it in vain. You’re debasing His holy name which is a sin.
Why Is Taking the Lord’s Name in Vain Wrong?
https://youtu.be/fT10MPun7wU

=====
(Ask me why people who use God as an excuse to unjustly kill, deprive, abuse or abase others disproves the “No true Scotsman” fallacy. It should be obvious after you read this comment but if you need to know more, ask.)
*** Completely irrelevant to the point, but since you brought it up, it’s not Christians using God as an excuse to unjustly kill, deprive, abuse or abase others. That would be the Muslims. And no. They are not associated with Christianity or Judaism ideologically. So enough with the “abrahamic religions” nonsense.
=====
The phrase “God damn it” is not taking the Lord’s name in vain.
*** Oh but it is. You’re asking God to bring a curse down on something which is not only using his name with irreverence but also without authority. Let your yes be yes and your no be no.
James 5:12 “Above all, my brothers and sisters, do not swear–not by heaven or by earth or by anything else. All you need to say is a simple “Yes” or “No.” Otherwise you will be condemned.”
=====
For one thing, “God” is not a name it’s a title. Like “King”. His name is the Tetragrammaton not “God”. Jewish people often use the word “Hashem” in place of the word “God”. Hashem is also a title, it means “The Name”, it is not The Name itself. Non-Jewish people generally say “The Lord”, same kind of thing, same kind of results.
*** You’re picking the fly shizzle out of the pepper to make a point. It’s a distinction without a difference as far as most people are concerned.

=====
His Name is YHVH, the Tetragrammaton. If you read a Christian Bible where you see the words “The Lord” in italics that’s because the translators substituted that phrase for “YHVH”. This happens a lot in the Old Testament. Anyone claiming to be a Christian should be at least well educated enough in his Faith to know this much as it is a common mistake people make when trying to claim offense at the speech of others.
*** There’s plenty of fine Christians who aren’t familiar with this detail, and Tom isn’t claiming offense. He’s stating offense and requesting a change POLITELY.

=====
The truth of the matter is that “God damn”, “God damned” and “God damn it” etc. are all curses. Not “cursing” in the modern vernacular as applies to things like f-bombs and colloquial references to feces (the word “swearing” is also used in this capacity incorrectly), but actual curses meant to put a curse upon a thing or a person.
To say “God damn ___” is to call down damnation from the Creator of the Universe on a thing or person. Or to express the intent or desire to do the same.
If you said “The Lord curse you/it/them” it would mean exactly the same thing and also would not involve taking God’s name in vain … But most people who try to flaunt their empty piety wouldn’t think of taking offense at that.
If you’re a Christian you want to be careful with that kind of thing. Matthew 16:19 says “Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.“
Those are the actual words of Yeshua Hamashiach (Jesus Christ’s Hebrew Name) as spoken to the Apostles. Apostles or not, any professing Christian does well to take them to heart.
*** Addressed all this above including the misuse of authority in swearing by God’s name which in and of itself is taking God’s name in vain.

=====
If you’re not a Christian then it’s nothing but an empty phrase demonstrating extreme disapproval or anger.
*** If you’re not a Christian then you have no real moral standard, so why worry? Seems to me you’re a little insecure about your own standard being challenged. Atheism is easy. Trying loving your enemies sometime.
Also easy to take potshots at other people who have standards as George Carlin did routinely with no Christian present on stage to provide the answers.
Also easy to take potshots at high profile Christians who sin as the news loves to do. Ever consider why the secular Marxists are trying to ban God from the public square and squash freedom of religion? Russian descended into the evil of Stalin’s communism within 10 years of ditching religion.
Richard Dawkins did the same a few years back saying Christians should be mocked. I don’t think so. We’re called to be servants not doormats.

=====
If you’re a Christian who claims to adhere to Biblical Principles, these are the only two ways to view utterances of this nature: Either as curse or expression of extreme disapproval. Full stop. There is no Biblical foundation for anything else.
**** Wrong. https://biblehub.com/exodus/20-7.htm
Exodus 20:7 – New International Version
“You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.”
Exodus 20:7 – King James Version
“Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.”
=====
Creating long lists of substitutions and acting all indignant is not a demonstration of your own piety.
**** Tom never said it was. Nice strawman.
=====
That’s nothing more than virtue signalling your own empty, meritless virtue the same as any Leftist would … or ignorance. Now you have no excuse for the latter and would do well to avoid the former. Because all you’re accomplishing is reflecting a bad light on Christians by making The Faith appear petty and judgemental.
**** Not at all. Tom is expressing his and his wife’s opinion not forcing it upon anyone else. Even if he had the power to do so, which he doesn’t, Christianity doesn’t command anyone anywhere anyhow to force their beliefs upon others. That’s why you want Christians in charge rather than…oh I don’t know…a secular left trying to enact tyranny through censorship, gun confiscation, one party rule with no filibuster and a packed Supreme Court to do their bidding and federalizing elections so they can stop pretending they don’t fix them.
=====
Lastly, there are things in this world deserving of being cursed. The application of Steve’s language is strong but appropriate to the things he was cursing. Those things are indeed damnable.
**** Coudn’t agree more. How about “cursed be this administration who doesn’t give one rat’s behind about the American people. To hell with them all.”
Leaves God out of it, preserves the reverence of His name and communicates the same level of anger and frustration especially when uttered with the passion Steve demonstrated.
Having said that, I will say this. That would be my preference. However, I am not here to hold everyone else to my standard. First of all, I’m far from perfect. Second, I appreciate the fact that the guys keep it to a minimum. Third, I wouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater and ditch my membership. I understand that swearing is a common go-to to express higher levels of anger and frustration.
What I don’t like and don’t watch are the gratuitous swearing and violence in some entertainment. Furthermore, since the left has finished normalizing it there, they’ve moved on to normalization through reading materials in elementary schools which is the exact wrong direction. It’s base, boorish and unintelligent not to mention immoral. Christ teaches that our words reflect our heart, so why swear or insult people at all.

Respectfully submitted. God bless.

As a damn Yankee (one from the North who now lives in the South) I can assure you that you left out a big one from your list: Bless your heart!.
In fact it could be added to any of those you listed.
Oh, and as to Steve’s use of “salty” language; I am going to presume this was an attempt at sarcasm a la Scrappleface. None of these gents uses much profanity ( I suspect Scott probably none now, but when younger . . ) but sometimes emphasis is useful.
But again, as one from the North, some gerunds just flow past me I have heard them so frequently.

Swearing often reduces its impact. Since he doesn’t do it often, nor do any of them, it underscored just how upset Steve is over these things. So in this case, I took it as bold facing the text, as I’m sure it was meant.

He’s not asking God to Damn something, much less to damn something trivial (that’s pretty much what I take “taking his name in vain” means — your mileage may vary. He is instead pointing out things that he believes deeply are already damned by He who has the authority to damn things as such.

If you are a parent that doesn’t use strong language or even raise his voice frequently, when you do, your kids will generally take note and listen up.

If you do it all the time, they’ll just continue to play their video games and only hear slightly louder mumbling in the background.

Is this a Bee?
In case it is serious, and you’re actually angry in name of Christianity, let me try to direct your attention a bit.
We got a small number of commandments indeed, and supposed to study them, understand them and follow them too.
We have one at the tail directly connected to speach: “Don’t lie.” In usual translations it may be buried in more fancy language like don’t provide false testimony or something — and people use that as escape hatch to limit its scope despite the many references it really mean to keep your talk simple and truthful.
The other, that comes earlier has tendency to be butchered even more, As formally it looks like it’s about the name or the usage of the word. So easy to misrepresent it be about swearing or something like that.
But it isn’t. It is about *invoking* God. In something the person just does for his own purpose.
We do plenty of bad, selfish, evil and/or stupid things. That can be escalated bigtime if we do it “in God’s name” or pretend to do it on his behalf. This commandment is parallel to avoid false prophets and obviously to avoid being the false prophet on any scale.
https://youtu.be/nI8OtOfzUDE

I think we have all been that frustratingly angry. Let he is without sin cast the first stone. Trust me I sure can’t cast the first or even any stone. We all fall short, just in different ways. My sensitivities where jarred but definitely not nearly as much as when AOC starts to open her mouth.

… and Pelosi, and Schumer, and Biden, and Obama, and Kamala, and most of all Ohmar — I really want to slap the arrogant smirk of that cow’s face.

Oh I’ve gone through periods where I threw caution to the wind. I’m much more at peace though when I’m trying to do right by God including reigning in my tongue. It’s hard to find substitutes at first though for those times when you say, stub your toe.
Beyond that, we can, of course, still sin without “swearing.” The use of “idiot” or “moron” with bad intent does that. Believe me. Replying in the YouTube comment sections can be a challenge sometimes!

I am neither a religious man nor am I a spiritual man (whatever that means). I am also not atheist nor agnostic. I have my own definition of each word, taking the “A” prefix from the Greeks, it’s “Anti”, so we add “theist” (god), You can’t be “Anti God” unless you have a belief of some kind that there is/are god(s) you can be against. Agnostic follows, “A” followed by “gnostic” (knowledge), I’m definitely not against knowledge. In any case, I don’t swear, that’s not a hundred percent true, I did use the s___ word when I was talking to my wife’s Oncologist and found that my wife had cancer. (An aside, it looks like they got it all.) Having said all that, I too was taken aback when Steve used that phrase multiple times. Oddly enough, it wasn’t my sensibilities that were bothered, it was how Scott would take it.
A simple “Damn” would have gotten the thought across.

Thank you, Jeremy. We received the reading of her Cat Scan today, After DuckDuckGoing (googling is much shorter to type) every 2nd or 3rd word (if I were a congress critter, God forbid, I would require all medical documents to be written in language that a English speaking person can understand)It appears that the tumor on her liver has reduced in size so that it can be removed. Hedging my bets, Thank You for the prayers.

Well that’s great news! Will continue to pray for you and your wife through her improvement, surgery and recovery. Medical reports written in plain English would be a vast improvement! I wonder if they have a translator for that online like they do for other languages. If not, they should!

Thank you, Jeremy. I’ve looked for a medical to English dictionary and haven’t found one. As a coder, or at least I was before I retired, I wouldn’t want to do it. Have to send the “code” to 12 years of schooling for each of the disciplines. Not sure I could afford that.

I for one was glad to hear it because I would have said the same thing. I’m sorry if people have tender sensabilities but I believe this isn’t the time for tenderness.

You should enjoy this…https://www.citizensjournal.us/trumps-lack-of-decorum-dignity-and-statesmanship/
“We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush, as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency.
We tried statesmanship.
Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain?
We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney?
And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.”

It continues from there…

So, TLDR; we tried the debil, the senile, and the skunk and it all failed… because the left posted just similarly awful people. Then we won when *they* went overboard with Killary. Conclusions?

Many conclusions …

The Left is not afraid to wield political power when they have it and the Right is scared to death to do the same. Until Donald Trump came along.

When Donald Trump came along and started to wield political power correctly for the benefit of all Americans and to the improvement of America and the world in general — The wheat quickly separated from the chaff on the Right.

When Donald Trump came along and started to wield political power correctly for the benefit of all Americans and to the improvement of America and the world in general — We found out which Republicans are more interested in the cult of personality in its negative aspects. Those who put Trump’s personality ahead of the good of the nation and the world formed a clear demarcation of the dividing line between their opposites who are patriots. This clearly demonstrated the differences between and their “good ol’ boy” network/the swamp, and the needed political change the Right had been advocating for over a period of decades.

Once again the Right squandered political capital because of minor squabbling and quibbling rather than put the good of the Nation first. Which is what Jeremy Amsden and the article he cites are doing here.

John McCain’s “collegiality” went out the window just because he had a personal dislike of President Trump. It was John McCain’s vote that, against all standards of “collegiality” and solidarity with his Republican colleagues decided the matter in failure to defeat Obamacare once and for all. It was John McCain and him alone that was the deciding vote against Obamacare. John McCain abandoned his colleagues for a personal vendetta and failed to stand with them when “collegiality” came down to the wire where it made a real difference. John McCain’s talk did not match his walk and because of him Obamacare was not soundly defeated, which is something John McCain and his colleagues had said they wanted to do since passage of the Affordable Care Act. Clearly John McCain did not ‘”desperately prize “collegiality”’ and saying he did is an obvious lie.

Trump proved we could still have a form of “dignity” apart from his irascible personality and those who put the Nation first realized that Trump’s prickly persona did not defeat the goals of the Right. If for no other reason than that Trump’s policies gave tens or even hundreds of thousands of people the “dignity” of self realization through gainful employment. I’ll take a loudmouthed jerk that does good things over the “quiet dignity” of someone like George W. Bush every single time.

Though it can easily be said that Trump’s pettiness and peevishness while inconsequential to his policies still proved to resource his enemies greatly. That was enough to put the enemies of America into power. It was enough to create an election close enough that cheating made all the difference for the first time in the history of Presidential elections. In this manner, Trump is at least partly at fault for where we sit today. If Trump had the mouth of Ronald Reagan and the policies of Donald Trump the current occupant of the Oval Office would be named Trump not Biden.

Etc. There are a lot of conclusions to be drawn and these are only a few. As long as American Republicans hide behind and use things like “dignity” and “collegiality” as excuses not to adopt the right policies and don’t do the right thing for the country in lieu of their own personal self-image and virtue signalling — There is no chance of winning. If you don’t win so that you get some sort of control over the situation your own “dignity” and “collegiality” plus $5 will get you nothing more than a cup of expensive coffee at Starbucks.

In fact, I would argue that lame “dignity’ and shallow “collegiality” are nothing more than smoke and mirrors. There is a war being fought for the future of the United States and the edification of Mankind, shooting blanks is not going to win that war. If you’re not willing to roll up your sleeves and get your hands dirty husbanding the good soil of the American body politic, you’re not worthy to be in office. Clearly the other side is willing to do this and that is why they are in power right now.

I ask that you read the article again. It supports your position and mine, which is why I said you might enjoy it. The point is we’ve tried dignity and collegiality but prefer Trump despite his blunt nature as he fights. Comparison were made to Ulysses S. Grant (a drunk) and Patton, a profligate purveyor of profanity.
We’re definitely in a war against, in my opinion, communism evidencing itself as cultural Marxism. Full agree this is not the time to pull punches.
They’ve been at it for a while. Don’t know if you’ve seen these, but I believe they’re worth everyone’s time. While we’ve been playing nice, the leftists haven’t missed an opportunity to advance.

People need to wake up. The virtue signalers are just the useful idiots described by Lenin. The communists will get rid of the socialists and the Muslims (addressed in part two) in the end. It’s shocking, disturbing and frightening how much they’ve already accomplished…
Agenda 1: Grinding America Down
https://youtu.be/jw8s-_kVGXw
*** takes you through the whole history from the Frankfurt School linking to Obama and today’s Democrats…
Agenda 2: Masters of Deceit
https://youtu.be/YtfWlp_aprE

Frankly, I’m surprised that the little fascists that are the Democrats haven’t rooted out every copy of these and destroyed it in the name of, you know, social justice. Lol.

In one small part of the counteroffensive, I’ve stopped using the word “narrative” and have instead been calling systemic racism and the fake news propaganda for what it is…one big fat lie. Hilarious that they call Trump’s statements regarding the stolen election “the big lie.” Even more hilarious that we’re not letting them get away with it. Wisconsin just announced that they’re going to do a full audit.

In my personal assessment of the intelligence, this is all being done in the greater context of an attempted takeover of the West by globalist communists represented by the CCP who already control a certain number of our politicians including Biden. The Great Reset is just their putting lipstick on the pig of a communist world with no upward mobility where we will own nothing and be completely dependent on the government. The “own nothing” part they come out and say. The “completely dependent lacking freedom” part they omit.

They’ve been at it in the U.S. for almost 100 years. BLM seems to have ties to the CCP through communist groups in Minnesota and San Francisco.

The communist Democrats need to be expelled from government for treason.

Neither was McCain very collegial when he was allowing veterans in his home state of Arizona to die while on the waiting list at the VA.
The RINO’s are just as bad as the liberal elites when it comes to a false sense of propriety and morality. The Lincoln Project professing to be reps of the “real” GOP while looking the other way as their leader has sex with underage boys is a prime example.

Leave a Reply