Categories
BW Member Blog

If you’re not paying for the service, then expect to be censored

If you’re not paying for the service, then you are the product, and the advertiser is the buyer.

Advertiser don’t value conservatives (and their content) as much as they value others because they aim to target the maximum reach. This means in order to appease the advertisers, the website WILL censor you.

So if you are being lured towards a free service, then expect to be censored. Start paying for services you use.

If you’re a lady, then don’t expect men to buy drinks for you, otherwise you don’t truly understand why those drinks are ‘free’.

10 replies on “If you’re not paying for the service, then expect to be censored”

I did not join Twitter because I am self-aware enough to know I am too much of a Blabbermouth to make that work.

I email photographs to people I want to send them to. I feel more control over who sees them that way. Sorry Instagram.

Facebook, I was foolish enough to join. And lucky enough to manage to get thrown off of in a way that it would take to long to fix.

I do wish Bill would leave Facebook, as would the fans of TSL who set up that Member’s Page there. As things stand now, I guess when Bill will be on Twitch with his shows.

But to your point, Free means you find out the price later, and are stuck with it.

I’m not social enough for social media. Check the profile picture. There’s a reason why I chose it.
But with that said…
“I email photographs to people I want to send them to. I feel more control over who sees them that way.”
When my wife and I got married, everybody who wanted pictures had to give us a mailing address. We mailed them a flash drive with the pictures on it.
The reason why? Because there is no such creature as internet security. For example, these words passed through at least 2 servers to get from the place where I wrote them to the place where you can read them.
You have no idea who has access to those servers, and neither do I. So these words are in the hands of strangers, of wholly unknown numbers, abilities and intent. So are any photos you have emailed.
I hate to be a buzzkill, but you have no assurance whatever that pictures of your wife, your girlfriend, your mom or your daughter won’t end up photoshopped into a porn video unless you never, ever put them on the internet in any form.
To be fair, the risk isn’t huge. You have a lot of safety just in the sheer volume of data, thus lowering the odds that it will be your data in particular that is used.
But for me, it’s not that I don’t like the odds… it’s that I don’t like the size of the pot.

It seemed convenient at the time.

And the photos tend to be of my garden and what I bake and cook.

Nothing you can make Porn out of.

Or learn anything about me that I don’t blabber on about anyhow.

You’ve obviously never heard of Internet Rule #34: If it exists, there’s porn of it.

To test the rule, I looked up paper clip porn once. It exists. Your beans aren’t safe.

I’ll take your word for it.

I retired the garden in this apartment (I need to move and had to sacrifice one of two things that makes it more difficult to move than it already will be).

But I may continue to post the baking photos.

Baking Photos are common on the interwebs, and maybe even all Rule 34’d out.

“Baking Photos are common on the interwebs, and maybe even all Rule 34’d out.”
I can picture someone saying, “Ooo, check out those muffins!”

I am about to make some Blueberry Muffins to go with those last three strips of Bacon I have in the fridge.

I shall post a photo of them Naked (!!!) and you can tell me if investing in some Muffin-Sized French Maid costumes will be worth the investment.

Leave a Reply