Categories
MB2A

JUSTICE: Hillary, Epstein and Cuomo Reveal the U.S. Constitution’s Single Point of Failure

The Constitution has no flaws in it, but it does have a single point of failure — revealed by the stories of Hillary Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein and Andrew Cuomo.

JUSTICE: Revealing the U.S. Constitution's Single Point of Failure

The U.S. Constitution is the Apollo program of governance. So, what went wrong? The Constitution has no flaws in it, but it does have a single point of failure — revealed by the stories of Hillary Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein and Andrew Cuomo.

Moving Back to America with Bill Whittle is a production of our Members.

Video below hosted at Rumble.

Listen to the Audio Version

45 replies on “JUSTICE: Hillary, Epstein and Cuomo Reveal the U.S. Constitution’s Single Point of Failure”

Jeff Sessions was a major disappointment as AG, but Bill Barr’s genius was running a con on us conservatives to make us think that he was just accumulating massive amounts of evidence to make prosecutions of the bad guys iron clad and inevitable. What rubes we have all been. If we don’t start playing the game like the Dems this country’s future is a dismal and foregone conclusion.
Thanks for your insight on this Bill. Eric Holder should be in prison (along with his boss) for shredding the rule of law.

I just learned a new word yesterday, on someone else’s blog. It is “kakistocracy” – government by the least suitable or competent citizens of a state.

I think we are well on the road to becoming a kakistocracy, if we haven’t already got there. So how is this happening to our once great nation? We the people are letting it.

If voting tyranny out doesn’t work because election fraud is baked in by using machines controlled by criminals, and if the Justice Department has turned traitor and overruled the US Constitution and SCOTUS, and if a usurper such as Biden can knowingly and illegally occupy the White House, where do WE , the citizens, the ones damaged by these tyrants, go to find redress for our grievances?

Nothing you said was untrue. In my opinion, YouTube banned the video for suggesting that the election was stolen, suggesting that the Capitol protest was staged and basically telling the truth or at least asking questions about things the establishment would rather keep quiet. Welcome to Biden’s Marxist America.
Another great video. Please keep up the good work. Scott and Steve and Zo as well. Love you all. God bless. You are providing us all with an invaluable service.

Spot on, Mr. Whittle; the Department of Justice is the weak governmental link. I’ve mentioned this before, but I believe it bears repeating. I was working on the road with a group of people from all over the country when we learned that Obama had been elected. I told them, “Well, you’ve all just moved to Chicago.” When they asked what I meant, I replied, “You’ll see.” And here we are. Chicago political corruption was able to reach such legendary levels primarily because the ruling class made it painfully clear to the federal prosecutor that, once he no longer served at the pleasure of the President, he could expect to enjoy no future anywhere that was anywhere in the legal profession should he upset the status quo in his current job. Understand that rewarding your friends and punishing your enemies with every instrumentality of government isn’t a fringe benefit of federal elected office, it’s become the very point of the exercise, the way it’s always been here. Clinton, Obama, and now Biden have been very diligent in populating the entire federal bureaucracy with fellow travelers who despise Constitutional checks on government power. As for another weak link, the check of the press, here’s a little tidbit from the time of Obama’s candidacy for President. Roe Conn hosted the afternoon drive show that followed Rush on WLS. To offer a Chicago angle to the election coverage, he was frequently invited to New York to appear on national TV news segments. I recall him once mentioning that word came down from management there that any mention of corruption was not welcome in connection with his Obama commentary. Talk about misinformation. One can’t inform the public about a successful Chicago politician without defining the standard of success.

This one made my membership here worthwhile!! YT removed it for “violating YouTube’s community guidelines”……imagine that!! Someone telling the truth on their web site!? My membership here is worth every dollar I put in, so THANK YOU Bill, Steve and Scott!

Bill really rattled me on this and the truth does hurt. One of his best videos IMHO. I found it frustrating through Trumps presidency that we kept hearing that guys like Brennan, Clapper and others were going to be prosecuted, but nothing ever happened. Instead the FBI raids Roger Stone in the dark of night with CNN cameras rolling. I am so pessimistic about the future and believe it or not Bill seems to carry a positive tone which does give me hope. I don’t have a lot of faith in the electorate because many people I know have no clue in what is going on and they listen to the complicit media for all their news. Election integrity and people getting off their butts and getting involved will make a difference. I am slowly moving from CA to Idaho and even here in Idaho many politicians who identify as Republicans are squishes. We need to start vetting candidates and not stand by and let someone else do it. We also need to spread to our friends and social media accounts, Bill’s videos. I am surprised by how many people that identify as conservatives do not even know who Bill is. His voice needs to be heard because of his prophetic views. Bill needs to come to Idaho and speak to the Ronald Reagan club and Eagle Conservatives. They would be blown away by what he has to say. BTW, who is in charge of marketing at Billwhittle.com? Asking for a friend. 🙂

By starting the ‘investigations’ even before he took office they put him in a box where any attempt to defend himself either verbally of by firing the coup plotters or defending Flynn could be called ‘obstruction of justice’ and thus an impeachable offense. Quite similar to the perjury trap where forgetting what you ate for lunch last Dec 18 is either obstructing the investigation or lying to the FBI. The FBI is out of control when they can determine what a lie is and nothing is recorded in real time at a time when every phone is a video camera

Good points, but I think you’re being a bit naïve about voters turning out in such great numbers they can’t out-fraud us. We THOUGHT we did that in 2020 — 74 million votes strong– but they just kept pulling more and more and more ballots from under the table until they had enough to win. Unless we put a STOP to the fraud at state levels, we will never win another election again.

The entire federal government needs to be shutdown immediately. I mean that literally – every single department from the presidency to the house to the congress, and most especially Justice, Education, HUD, Supreme Court, all of them including the military! Hold every federal government department head in solitary confinement until culpability has been established. Send most federal employees packing to whatever communist country will have them. We don’t want those traitors anywhere near us. Cut off the spending spigot – all federal spending to the penny – no more benefits of any kind! No more collection of taxes. I don’t even know what that would look like, how it could be done, or what would happen as a result, but we have a rogue government at the helm, going back, I don’t know, at least to the Wilson administration, or before, which is growing ever more rogue with every subsequent administration. Neither Trump, nor any single person, can do it alone.

Of course the above can’t be done until an honest administration formed of good people is ready to step in and bring our country back to what it was meant to be: small government with limited powers.

Kevin’s comment that no “good Americans” run for office is correct, but that has to change, somehow, someway. The only good ones we want are the ones who don’t want the job, but will sacrifice and step up to do the right thing. Among my fellow members here at BW.C are some of those good people. Many of the people I follow for information are good people. Bill, Scott and Steve are good people. Good people number in the millions in America, and if some of them could come together to form a leadership coalition, step into the vacancies of only the most necessary positions needed to provide the protection of our border with a strong military and manage infrastructure (not the democrats meaning of infrastructure) with an aim to close some of the gaps in the Constitution which leave us vulnerable to those who seek to corrupt, our country might be saved. Easy? No! Necessary? Yes!!! Fantasy? Probably☹️

Ah, the big reset… Did that ever happen in actual history?
All the cases I’m aware of are like a bunch of pioneers felt it’s enough and started a new colony from scratch. And the old one eventually collapsed or got conquered.

By now unfortunately the world is full, for a new territory is only under ocean, antartica, Moon, Mars or similar nasty places. No more freebies.

Bill, excellent points. You may be 100% right.
I recently read the book Chaos Under Heaven by Josh Rogan. It points out that Trump made several mistakes. I was shocked to learn that he had a personal relationship with Xi Jinping, that he considered him a personal friend and that Xi would frequently call Trump up and ask that he do this or that “as a friend”. Trump did these things for Xi and never got a single consolation in return. Shocking blindness. Totally out of character, but true.
Let’s hope he has learned some lessons on these subjects.

Bill, thank you for this. I feel it is one of the most poignant pieces you have published in some time. I have shared it as far as I can. I have put the Republican party on notice that they can expect support in the future only if they actually do something other than talk. What more can I do?

You CAN write to all your legislative representatives and ask them to impeach our current president ASAP. I am.

Of course, the Biden administration and the CDC decided to up the ante even further by becoming the first administration, in my memory at least, to openly defy a Supreme Court ruling. When the Executive openly defies the Judiciary, the system of Checks and Balances has been effectively eliminated. And to your point, Bill, they feel that they can do this because they control the Justice Department and know that no one will be held accountable.

Bill at 16:00: Failure to protect the voting process is the actual suppression of the vote of the legitimate voters, via the illegal voting of people otherwise not allowed to vote. Excellent point!! And that is what our Republican “leaders” should also be emphasizing about the necessity of ensuring those protections are in place and are enforced. Shame Stacey Abrams and her ilk into silence.

The point about losing the DOJ to corrupted elements is valid, but even that could be overcome if the media was not so sunk in its own bias and perfidy as to bring the message of corruption to the public for correction. I don’t tend to give any (or much) credence to ideas about mass hysteria, but perhaps that is what we are really seeing???

The Constitution is not perfect as a document, as there are elements where the language is still open to interpretation or too easily distorted for vile purposes: the 2nd Amendment; Commerce Clause; perhaps the 14th Amendment?; the excessive loss of federalism in the 17th Amendment; lack of a balanced budget provision vs. the 16th Amendment; etc. Perhaps lack of term limits? Perhaps defining the SCOTUS’ role, membership and terms in office more clearly?
Our Framers understood human nature in their efforts to provide checks and balances and separation of powers, but they may also have been limited by their 18th Century environment. Overall, they did a great job, but we have let distortions come into play that they would never have countenanced.

In too many times and places the Congress has delegated its legislative role to the executive branch administrative state; and the SCOTUS has (up to now) allowed excessive deference to those agencies, including them having judicial and legislative aspects to their efforts.

More could be said, but I have to go. I am probably speaking to the choir anyway. 🙂

” I don’t tend to give any (or much) credence to ideas about mass hysteria, but perhaps that is what we are really seeing???”

My opinion is that is not the case. I don’t think it’s mass hysteria. I think we’re seeing the fruits of several generations raised with the idea of winning at all costs, “by any means necessary” as some have put it, even those advocating action on the Right. (Which attitude is something I find repulsive, btw and I’ll explain below.)

“By any means necessary” makes successful cheating a virtue. The expression says it all. Children who were raised to think cheating is OK if you win have now become adults. They are the parents and grandparents of the current generation now coming of voting age

If the only thing that’s important is winning and if cheating is OK as long as you win, then there are no constraints on behavior. It doesn’t matter if the other side knows you cheated or even that they know and can prove it, if there’s nothing that can be done about the cheating.

For an example outside of politics. I was in the military and I learned that often good planning, strategy, tactics and morale are factors in overcoming superior numbers. I believe to this day that there are stratagems and maneuvers that if applied correctly can turn any fight to a positive outcome against far greater numbers made up of lesser leadership and inferior troops. It’s a matter of finding or devising that strategy and using what you have to maximum effect but …

That only applies under the outlines of the rules of warfare, if you exceed those rules and cheat, you’re not the good guy anymore even if you win.

Obviously, faced with sporadic fire from a village on friendly troops, by this description it would be “cheating” to execute a tactical nuke strike on the village. You’d win, because everything in the village would die. You’d kill a lot of people who weren’t doing a thing to your forces and were just trying to live through the engagement too. But you’d win and if winning is all that matters then with that standard there’s no reason not to nuke every place you get sniper fire from.

(I’m using nukes as an extreme example, substitute carpet bombing with a wing of B-52s or a hand full of thermobaric bombs if you prefer. In fact, at 2500 – 3000 degrees Celsius in its plasma cloud and an overpressure of up to 1000 lbs per square inch the main difference between a thermobaric and a nuke is lack of fallout.)

My point here is that there are limits to cheating, even in a life and death struggle. You can go in and root out the insurgents door to door but you can’t vaporize the village and all the women and children therein.

The reason there are limits is that the backlash and eventual end results of cheating are worse than not winning. Killing everyone in a contested zone is going to lose you a lot of friends, real fast. Enough that you’ll probably lose the war. It actually helps the enemy in the bigger picture.

Parents who have failed to raise their offspring to understand this have done none of us any favor.

Cheating by subverting the press, neutering the Justice Department and tampering with the election process is going to have it’s own negative consequences. It may take longer and we may be in for a ration of grief meanwhile, but it’s going to cost the other side eventually*. Of that I have no doubt, cheating is a short range solution that isn’t worth what it costs. It’s not that I’m being altruistic, on the contrary avoidance of cheating is entirely self-serving.

“… I am probably speaking to the choir anyway.”

Yes, you are. That’s OK, an old familiar hymn is still good to hear. Don’t worry about that.

(* Think of Harry Reid’s “nuclear option” and what that’s going to do to Democrats if we win back both houses of Congress in the 2022 election as a prime example.)

William Barr had sterling credentials and seemed to have a strong backbone. Mr. Trump would have been excoriated by the right, left, and center had he bravely fired him. Even I would have hesitated to praise that move.
But then, I’ve watched the corruption of western law, as I have witnessed the demise of private fact-providers like Wikipedia. In spite of it all, collectivism and racism not only thrives, but is celebrated as heroic. Etc,
I don’t know what to do about such perversions except pack my family and guns and then vote with my feet. ..Move to a small, like-minded community and, like a good wolf pack, protect it. I.e., Do as RightAngle suggested a while ago; Get small.
Oh, and also, as I do, slow down and speed up The Wheel..

Flynn was abused by DOJ from the first day of Trump. And he left it going up to the last.
Do you need a better canary than that? Just that single case for me stops any apology attempt for Trump. He culd not be unaware of what’s going on and by who. If nothing else, he could have measure his new guy Barr’s performance to put it straight immediately. And put away Shiff for lying left and right. O yeah, and what about the campaign promise that if he’s prez, kilalry is in jail?
People are romantic for him, but should take the other half of the red pill — he was loud on twitter, but in actual stuff played for the swamp. And just never made a move.
It should be an important lesson, not to be repeated in the future. You want the swamp gone, just picking a celebrity who is “not you classic politician” is not enough. And doing better on hte economy and foreign things is also not enough, when in the meantime the internal matters rot to dust.

With respect to the increasingly one-sided press, we’ve been seeing an increasing trend toward the Chinese model of culture where “the nail that sticks up gets hammered down”. We call it “cancel culture”. Some people are able to weather that storm.
Now we’re seeing the people who protested on January 6 being prosecuted as terrorists for what amounts, in most cases, to minor trespassing charges.
The message is clear. The Federal Government can destroy you if you don’t toe the line.

With respect to you and your comment, the so-called “one-sided press” is no longer deserving of respect. Perhaps it is time to cancel those who are currently in the “press”.

Taking that a bit further, it’s not just the Chinese model, it’s a common pattern of tyrants throughout history. Effective dissent to tyranny is necessarily founded on not only truth(s) but on exposing the lies of that tyranny. So all tyrants stamp on dissidence as a matter of their own survival. It’s easy to locate those dissidents, all the tyrant has to do is look for outbreaks of truth and there will be his targets.

Tyranny cannot withstand truth, truth causes tyranny to be terminated eventually. The thing is, what replaces it often is or becomes another form of tyranny or is susceptible in one degree or another to a gradual slide into tyranny. Among the many other things America is exceptional for, the fact that our revolution against the British not only succeeded but managed to recover from the effects of a revolution and install the most just government with the greatest potential for prosperity ever known to man is a big one.

Oh, and btw …It’s amusing when some half-literate person with anger management issues misconstrues your application of the common phrase “With respect to” as meaning anything other than “in regards to” or “as it applies to”. I’m sure that like me you don’t appreciate having your words twisted to the purpose of someone else but try not to take such a person seriously.

There is more than one definition for the word “respect” and choosing any other definition than made obvious by context that you clearly not intended is either an act of ignorance or malice. Those are the only two choices so I say “half-literate” because ignorance would at least be excusable and can be remedied with education. The alternative to ignorance is malice; intentionally twisting your words to mean something other than you intended them to. Thus “half-literate” is granting the benefit of the doubt.

Sure, George Washington could also just kiss the pinky ring instead of starting a rebellion. Having this area as docile as it is now 200 years earlier.

Interesting thoughts in this video; however, the failure does not exist in the US Constitution’s text, rather, the failure must be laid at the feet of a few generations of weak-minded people failing to defend it at all costs: mine and my parents’ generations have failed the efforts of my grandparents (WW2).
That said, placing blame upon faceless masses is a fruitless exercise. One question remains, what are we going to do about it now?

Suppose they do, is prez kamala or pelosi an improvement? Shouldn’t they wait for a sensible successor?

Exactly! We’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t given the current circumstances.

Great video, I hope we can hold on long enough to push through the election integrity stuff but we must elect good Americans or else we will just wind up back where we started.

Electing “good Americans” is pipedream. To understand what I mean, I must first define what it means to be an “American.” An American is someone that appreciates the opportunity that our constitutional republican form of government offers to improve our individual lives. Good Americans take advantage of that opportunity – in the private sector – and don’t tend to run for political office. Although there may be a handful of such good Americans that run (and win), the majority of people that run for office are NOT good Americans as defined. The overwhelming majority of the people that run for political office believe that they know better than you how to improve your life. Of course, they are wrong about that. No one knows better than me how to improve my own life. With that understanding, it is impossible to elect sufficient numbers of “good Americans.” The only way to avoid the imposition of rules and regulations on every aspect of our lives that drives Democrats (and unfortunately most Republicans as well) is to enforce the limitations on the federal government enshrined in the Constitution. Sadly, I do not see that happening in my lifetime.

Unfortunately so many “Good Americans” have been convinced that politics is such a foul corrupt business that they want nothing to do with it other than voting every 2 or 4 years. Also our independent conservative individualistic natures default to live and let live, don’t force yourself and your beliefs on others, etc. These attitudes are what has brought us to this sorry state of affairs.

Even the “good” americans should have a good guess that if everyone thinks it’s above him to clean the latrine, how it will look in short time.

Leave a Reply