Categories
Right Angle

‘Mad Physician’ Forced to Psych-Eval Over Spreading COVID-19 ‘Misinformation’

An M.I.T. educated anti-vaxxer doctor who prescribed ivermectin runs afoul of authorities and is forced to go to a psych-eval over spreading COVID-19 ‘misinformation’

An M.I.T. educated anti-vaxxer doctor who prescribed ivermectin runs afoul of authorities and is forced to go to a psych-eval over spreading COVID-19 ‘misinformation’. But there’s more to this story than meets the eye.

Video above hosted at Rumble.

Stephen Green, Scott Ott and Bill Whittle deliver 260 episodes of Right Angle each year, fueled and funded by our Members. Join us when you click the big green button above. To contribute without commitment, make a one-time or recurring donation when you click the big blue button. Thank you.

Listen to the Audio Version

12 replies on “‘Mad Physician’ Forced to Psych-Eval Over Spreading COVID-19 ‘Misinformation’”

The headline triggered me too. When all this C-19 crap started, I asked my own doctor how he treated COVID (hoping for a sympathetic ear if I might need it soon) and he told me that he had a letter from the state board that if he was caught prescribing HCQ they would pull his license to practice. THIS IN TEXAS!! However, he winked and said that perhaps we could find that I had some sort of parasite. Nudge nudge wink wink. Ivermectin seems to be good for that sort of thing.

“…we send them to a Psych exam to establish they are competent to fly. And they don’t pass that exam…ever. Then we send them for Brainwashing.” Comment by Govt. Prosecutor in “Contraband Rocket” Lee Correy, 1956

The key words are “Covid misinformation”. That’s all I need to hear to know that this is a political prosecution of a doctor. If the “doc’s-brain-is-defunct” charge was true, they’d not need to throw in the covid mis-misinformation charge. The whole point of this travesty is to intimidate real doc’s: This Could Happen To YOU, so TOE THE LINE.

Bill said “if you spell their name wrong they will discount everything you say after that”.
The media operate just the opposite “if they spell your name right you will accept everything they say after that”.
In other words, the media tells the truth on inconsequential things so that you will accept their narrative on issues where their agenda overrules the truth.

This is actually a quality-of-care issue. Regardless of your stand on the “nontraditional meds” this is an issue of lack of documentation and frankly appears to be poor medical care. She by reports has a history of poor documentation and poor care without regards to these meds. This is what we expect our medical boards to regulate.(from a board-certified orthopedic surgeon) These are not the droids you are looking for……move on. (What do you call the guy who finished last in his/her class in medical school??? “Doctor”)

Put everything in the headline that you want to get across – AND the fact that relatively few read past the headline has long been an effective propaganda tool.

The “spelling dismissal” is a lazy way to not argue.

“Actual facts are correct, but the explanation is faulty” … this is the norm in “news” these days. It is how they spread and entrench the narrative. Remember “Bart Simpson Bouncing”? This is how its done. Next week in Wood Carving the liberals I carve with will be repeating the headline and feeling like they are “in the know”.

I watched Nick Searcy’s “Capitol Punishment”. While his approach was amusing, I think it was geared toward the sympathetic. I wish it had been a little more serious and geared toward the squishy middle — but — he did show that SWAT teams were sent to innocuous protesters’ houses and people were thrown in jail under highly questionable circumstances in highly questionable conditions.

I agree about Capitol Punishent being a bit too one sided, and I have less of an issue with this fact given how one sided the legacy media has portrayed the Hanuary 6th Reichstag Fire.

Leave a Reply