Why the vaccine makes me think of the movie Logan
In the movie Logan food and drug companies team up with the federal government to control gene expression using genetically modified corn. The genes that gave Wolverine and Professor X their powers were suppressed. That was fantasy but the mRNA technology used in the COVID vaccines brings it closer to reality.
Remember your high school biology. If DNA is your cells hard drive, RNA is your cells RAM. When your cells make a protein or whatever the relevnt gene is copied into messenger RNA to be executed like machine code in a computer, (or more accurately a punch card loom.) MRNA “vaccines” work by injecting arbitrary code into your cells to be executed as if it were copied from your DNA. The Covid vaccines cause your own cells to make the proteins the virus uses to enter your cells. To train your immune system. But I don’t see any technical reason why the technology couldn’t be used to make estrogen or other psychoactive substances. It’s just arbitrary code after all.
I know the concept may be hard to convey to non technical people. But when people say we have a moral duty to get the vaccine, they are saying the government has a right to run arbitrary code on your cells hardware. I don’t see this discussed enough. Given the government’s interest in keeping the people docile we need to find a way to get the point across.
16 replies on “mRNA, estrogen, and COVID:”
To answer one of the questions, mRNA is only good to create a polypeptid. Estrogen and most psychoactive things are not polypeptids. You could maybe create insulin this way, but you could not control the amount, so the results would be more likely a disaster than good.
Who knows what this vaccine is really designed to do. Too quick, not enough test subjects, or time to observe side effects.
They instill the fear constantly so people will line up to take a vaccine. They’re tired of being scared and locked down.
More fear with the “new strain”, just when people were catching on that the whole world has been played.
Another way to divide the people (as if race and politics weren’t enough). Now it’s the anti-vaxers and all the sheep. The sheep will blame the anti’s for their continued lockdown and “inform” on them for anything and everything.
When they realize a majority of the population is opting not to get the vax, they will restrict us even further. Maybe we can’t fly, or cross state lines, or go to the grocery store. Who knows.
NY has a vote on a bill on Jan. 6th to vax children without parental consent.
I think they used this “crisis” to exert power and control over the masses in all these countries. They like the power, the money. They will continue to push their agenda until we rise up and put an end to it.
Truth is, it can be explained in simple terms, but the MSM and social media won’t allow it to be published/talked about. Censorship is rampant. Some people will blindly follow the MSM and their govt. even when it’s explained in simple language.
If people heil their government for ruining their lives, they deserve will get more of their lives ruined. Now and later on. Naturally.
Spot on, but you forgot to mention the law of unintended consequences. There are a lot of truck drivers who won’t get the “vaccine” as a condition of employment. I’m visiting family right now. But if my employer says I am required to get a mRNA vaccine I’ll quit.
Can you give some links on where you read all that stuff? On face value it doesn’t make any sense. A vaccine can’t be mRNA, as you inject it between the cells, not into the cells, so it would not do anything of effect. If the payload is mRNA, it must be packed inside a living virus. That will attack the cells and inject it. I have doubts we have the technology to create such a virus vector in the first place, and if we can I’d be reluctant to allow the use of it even on small groups, let alone on masses.
Sadly I wrote that from memory, not any specific articles. I went through high school biology when teaching creationism or not was the debate of the day. But I’ll try to give you a useful link. Not sure what you mean by a “living virus, ” a simpe virus is just a strand of RNA inside a lipoprotein jacket. The jacket can be synthesized. Same goes for the RNA part, assuming it’s not just cut and paste.
The coronavirus is a RNA fragment sitting in a protein capsile that is sitting in an lipoprotein envelope. The vaccine is supposed to induce immunoglobulines that neutralize the envelope. Those never see the RNA. As the RNA only ever appears inside cells, after the active virus managed to get in. The IGs are in the blood and outside the cells trying to prevent the virus to attach in order to get in. Knowing all that a “RNA-based vaccine” makes no sense whatsoever.
The “vaccine” causes your cells to make just part of the virus, the part that your immune system will recognize and latch onto. What I really want to know is whether or not the proteins are ejected from the cell that made them or if they get lodged in the cell’s wall.
I did find a few articles that explain RNA a bit but they are both sitting right between college and high school level.
https://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-role-of-rna-in-the-body.htm
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/microbiology/chapter/structure-and-function-of-rna/
“The vaccine causes your cells to make just part of the virus”, yeah, that is the part I look for any support, I know what mRRNA does and how it works, and that’s why I doubt it for the reasons in the previous post. If I had to speculate it might just refer to a new mass-production tech for the particular polypeptid bypassing cells with the template integrated in their DNA.
I assume you meant RNA. But yeah that’s what it looks like. It’s not a vaccine in the traditional sense at all.
Still waiting for some citation.
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/heres-why-you-should-skip-the-covid-vaccine/
The parts describing how it’s supposed to work are a ways in. It looks accurate but cites an article by RT. As I said before I wrote my original post drawing on my own memory of how cells work.
If it wasn’t clear before I maintain that research and development regarding how RNA controls gene expression is just the obvious next step.
On reviewing my post that last part maybe should have been more explicit in the original post. But I hope people did infer it. My goal was to get people talking about where this technology could lead if it’s not kept on a tight leash.
Thanks, after a few hops, this is the relevant material: https://www.bulatlat.com/2020/08/21/hazards-of-the-covid-19-vaccine/
I wasn’t aware we’re so far ahead in this vector technology. And yeah, those concerns are valid.
Thank you. That’s a much better one to share.
I certainly think that there needs to be a dialogue on exactly what the new technology does, how it can affect people and whether it should be allowed to be used indiscriminately, even during a pandemic.
Certainly there is a case to be argued that such a novel methodology can open up a pandora’s box of intrigue, control and rights abuses.