Despite being cleared by the Special Counsel investigation, President Donald Trump is still under attack from Democrats. Journalists have not apologized, recanted or changed their ways, and both sides have dug in further. What if the Mueller report changes everything — changes nothing?
Categories
Mueller Report Changes Everything — Changes Nothing
Despite being cleared by the Special Counsel investigation, President Donald Trump is still under attack from Democrats. Journalists have not apologized, recanted or changed their ways, and both sides have dug in further. What if the Mueller report changes everything — changes nothing?
8 replies on “Mueller Report Changes Everything — Changes Nothing”
The Russia stuff started in July of 2016, maybe earlier. All based on a 2007 dossier that was designed to take down McCain, re-written by Nellie Ohr (there where multiple versions), who was former CIA and now worked at Fusion GPS – who was paid by Perkins Coie by Hillary Clinton, it’s all in the open now. The Mueller investigation was based on no predicate crime, and Mueller himself never went through advise and consent. His position was unconstitutional to start with.
The Mueller Investigation matters because:
1. There was no predicate crime to base it on.
2. It was a block to keep Trump from destroying the coup plotters.
3. It destroyed lives, bankrupted families, and put innocent people in prison.
4. It is evidence of how deep the corruption in the government goes.
5. It assisted the Democrats in taking the House in 2018.
History Note: Clinton tried this exact scheme against McCain in 2008. The difference was, the FBI briefed the McCain campaign about possible Russian interference. The McCain people cleared out anyone suspicious and the whole thing blew over. The difference here is, the FBI never told the Trump campaign about possible Russian interference and the rest is history.
They are like people who want to believe Peter Pan is real. If you want it badly enough, then it will become real. Wrong. But I think there should be consequences. The system broke down. There was an active elitist coup to unseat the president with a fake hoax bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton’s people, and Obama knew it. Worse, FBI officials–who are supposed to be blind to political considerations–broke the law by swearing oaths for the FISA warrants knowing it was a lie the whole time. That is a crime. Parties from the NSA and CIA also colluded to try to unseat the president on this hoax basis. There needs to be serious, legal consequences for these crimes. It is one thing to go after an official for real crimes, but not for made-up crimes, and they investigators knew it was fake long ago. False charge repercussions needs to land on the backs of the officials and media pundits who falsely claimed for years that this hoax was real. CNN and MSNBC took this lie and told us it was the truth. Where laws were broken in passing on this hoax, legal action by the AG is due. CNN and MSNBC are done as far as being considered legitimate news. But the FBI guys who swore under oath–knowing it was a lie–need legal action taken on them. That swamp needs a clean-out. I don’t think Trump should let it go at all. He should go after the law breakers, without concern for party or politics. The mainstream media is not stupid, they are complicit. But they will never change their perspective. They will never accept Trump, so there is no point trying to convince them. But there are real legal consequences that need to happen to prevent such coup attempts in the future. Otherwise, the Republic remains in danger.
One thing about the collusion charge that NEVER made sense…
Why would the Russians back Trump when Hillary was giving them uranium? What could they expect to get from Trump? A motel??
Don’t think too hard re: WHY the Russians would back Trump. The reasoning falls apart almost immediately.
Just a bit of clarification Bill and Scott. The attempt to get around the Electoral College, is exactly that; a way to destroy it without the nasty Constitution getting in their way. The movement is called the National Popular Vote Compact, (NPVC).
If your stupid legislators like WA, CO, CA and 7 or 8 other leftist states sign on to the NPVC then they agree to give all their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. But the Democrats are sneaky bastards, so to keep it under the radar, it only takes effect when states that represent 270 electoral votes sign on.
They have states representing over 180 electoral votes already signed on and the full court press is on. This will be challenged in court, but that cannot happen, on the federal level anyway until it goes into affect, since no-one has standing in the courts until it does.
Here in the northern end of the leftist coast, Washington, we passed our NPVC back in 2009 (SB 5599), I do not remember when our southern comrades passed their’s.
There is currently a petition drive in CO to repeal this via popular vote – we’ll see where that goes. Since we now have mail-in balloting in CO, I feel that our votes will not count regardless.
I’m no lawyer and I don’t play one on TV but… Seems to me that this would be a slam dunk for striking down under equal representation.
Yes, the Constitution allows the states to award their EC votes as they see fit. But it also guarantees the people a republican form of government. So the elected reps of a state may award the EC cotes as they see fit but the reps MAY NOT award the votes based on the votes of people of a different state as that would deny them representation (republican form of government).