More immigrants to the U.S. settle in rural and suburban areas, away from the Democrat-run urban zones. Bill Whittle, Stephen Green and Zo Rachel examine the cultural and political consequences of this demographic shift on the future of the American Heartland.
Right Angle is a production of our Members, who give as little as $9.95/month to make sure that thousands can see these videos for free. They also enjoy backstage content and unfettered access to Member forums, the blog and comments. Join us now.
Video below hosted at Rumble.
14 replies on “Political Earthquake: Immigrants Dodge Democrat-Run Cities, Settle in the Heartland”
The left has thought this through. Foment/permit violence and lawlessness in blue-run cities to create an exodus to red state cities turning them blue. Bus illegals from the southern border to the heartland- couple that with legal immigrants who see what’s going on in Dem cities and you have the perfect blue re-population program of the red heartland for a new blue heartland. Pretty obvious to me.
I wonder what Mollie Timmons and all of the other Americans VIOLENTLY killed by illegal immigrants would say (If they could talk) to those (illegal immigrants) who have been moving into their communities. Can you really KNOW who they are or anything about them? Their first act was to break our law! Not a good beginning. I don’t like it and I find it very disturbing.
You will assimilate.
Egad! Borg!
No, Americans.
[spoiler title=”Bill, something to consider first.”] [/spoiler]
Bill,
To your suggestion of spreading the poor out. It has been tried, and it has failed horribly.
In the 1990’s, the poor were given vouchers to live in middle class neighborhoods, with the idea that they would observe productive habits and emulate the people they were around. What happened was the crime from urban areas was exported to the suburbs, where it spread out, while the urban centers saw a decrease in crime as part of urban renewal.
https://spoa.com/the-great-housing-experiment-that-failed/
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/american-murder-mystery/306872/
Note, the married couple passingly references in the first article, and more specifically in the second article (Richard Janikowski and Phyllis Betts) were devout liberals that supported the late 90’s poverty programs before they results became apparent.
You need to heed Zo when he says “if people don’t escape from that mindset first,” because if they don’t, they’re “just going to take that same mindset to someplace else,” and “infect that city too.”
See that’s what I’ve been saying. We should hold big rallies with lots of the colorful ethnic foods we enjoy in the USA and invite all new immigrants to join the Republican party which shares their values of hard work, pro-life, faith and right to self defense – all issues that would resonate with those escaping the horrors of some of their countries. If we did that, watch how fast the Dems would turn anti-immigration. I say we find ways to get them in legally, get them jobs where they are protected by labor laws, OSHA and treated fairly and not exploited. The big Dem supporters in the corporate exploitation of illegal immigrant labor would have a hissy fit. I used to work on behalf of exploited illegals in the colonias of Texas, all of which seem to be located in Democrat counties. Seems Democrats still like slavery even if it’s only slavery-lite.
Still racist after all these years.
This sign should be posted to every conservative state for people moving in to see.
Best lox & bagels I ever had was in Topeka, Ks.
To expand on Zo’s comment, “The poor will always be with us”; this was Jesus’ rebuke to the apostles when they complained that a vial of perfumed oil that a woman used to wash Jesus’ feet could have been sold and the money used to help the poor. So, Jesus’ rebuke lets us all know where He stands on social justice.
I have to imagine that at least one of the reasons immigrants are landing in more rural areas as opposed to the cities is basically why would they move to a place that looks like where they’ve left? Setting the riots aside for a second, the American Dream does not include being able to defecate in public, boldly steal from local storekeepers, dodge gang shootings every weekend or watch the local drug addicts shoot up in front of you. Most people have a synapsing neuron and run from stuff like this.
It’s pretty sad when the good people are fleeing and the immigrants won’t move there. You’d think the Dems would get the message, but I’m not holding my breath as I don’t look good in blue.
When there are no repercussions from bad choices. Horribly destructive policies and bottomless pit expenditures. Why would they change…It’s working just fine for them…
Great discussion! May it please Almighty God that we are wise enough as a Nation to apply it…
Even refugees are smart enough to avoid “progressive” enclaves.
Well, I finally get to use a technical term I learned over 50 years ago: spinodal decomposition: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=spinodal+decomposition&t=opera&ia=web
The concept of the melting pot and joining dissimilar materials or people into a homogenous mess or group has worked very well for the USA, and for creating a wide variety of metal alloys and other admixtures. These mixtures end up being stronger or more corrosion resistant, gaining the benefits of true diversity, or whatever, compared to the characteristics of each component separately.
But it appears that now our political and ethnic mix is spontaneously separating into “identity” groups, and that happens when some random flux of free energy ends up lowering the mixtures total energy by this separation. But in truth, spinodal decomposition is not what has occurred here, because we have had some “grains of sand in the gears” that have caused this precipitation from solution, as it were. And the source of this nucleation is the Leftist Gramscian March Through the Institutions.
Isn’t it fascinating that ANTIFA and the Leftists follow the ideas of Gramsci, Gramscism and Neo-Gramscism? Antonio Gramsci is well known in poli-sci circles as the “Father of Neo-Marxism” and was a contemporary of Benito Mussolini.
When Marxism failed utterly and completely along comes Gramsci to reset the board and set up failure of an even greater scope.
Marxist/Neo-Marxist ideas on “the economy” are largely centered around the concept of “haves and have nots”. This is viewed as a permanent status quo which can only be changed by overthrow of the system. It fails to take into account a system whereby the “have nots” can through their own efforts become “haves”, essentially transforming every member of society into “can haves”.
The latter being what we have in our Republic of the United States of America.
If we could only get across to the Neo-Marxist Gramscian Left that there is a better system and it’s already in operation right here in America — We could convince every person led astray by Neo-Marxist, postmodernism critical theory who had the actual good of their fellow man at heart to join us.
Notice the qualifier in that sentence above? How do you identify those who do not have the good of their fellow man at heart? Despite their claims to the contrary because as we all know actions and deeds speak louder than words and rhetoric?
That’s easy. They’re Neo-Gramscian, Neo-Marxist, postmodern Leftists shoving critical theory down everyone’s throat.
Evil evolves, if the current flavor of critical theory known as “critical race theory” and which is nothing more than thinly veiled racism doesn’t work … Evil will find another tool and switch tactics.
scott ott update?????