Categories
Backstage Right Angle

Right Angle: Backstage (12-08-2020)

Out of a sheer sense of devotion to the cause — casting their lethargy to the wind — the men of Right Angle decide to produce an extra episode this week.

Right Angle: Backstage (12-08-2020)

Out of a sheer sense of devotion to the cause — casting their lethargy to the wind — the men of Right Angle decide to produce an extra episode this week.

If you didn’t already get the memo, this is a mandatory Backstage meeting for all Members. Attendance will be taken.

https://youtu.be/PUfZ6o11koE

52 replies on “Right Angle: Backstage (12-08-2020)”

I’m here… although if it’s mandatory, doesn’t that mean that it’s not worth it? The only mandatory things are those we don’t want to do, but are being made to do by our elites, our ‘betters’ (in what way?).
Please don’t make watching these videos mandatory! That would decrease their value!

My Mom is 90, i see her every day, she is healthier than I am, almost never wears a mask, they’re a joke. Only wears one to avoid receiving dirty looks. I’m 66 with asthma, never wear a mask either & use my medical condition as amy reason to. I will not give up my freedom even for the risk. My daus r numbered, .ours r all. I live in a great county in AZ that has a Constitutional Sheriff who will not support those edicts.

P.s. love aliens, they live in Dragoon Az, check it out. Town with no people.

Unlike many of the other cases discussed by the media in recent weeks, the Supreme Court has Original Jurisdiction on this one. The Founding Fathers set it up this way so that states would not be fighting against one another. So this case did not start in one state’s supreme court, get bumped up to an appellate District Court and then appealed to the Supreme Court.
Texas is contending that the defendants (MI, WI, PA and GA) tainted the Election results by not following their own states’ rules, which can only be changed by their own state legislatures, thereby violating the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, they caused harm by diluting votes of their own states’ legal voters by flooding their counts with illegal ballots and, since this election is for a national office, that of President, it taints the votes of the lawful voters in Texas as well.
I believe 8 other states as of this writing believe TX has such a strong case that they are joining the case as well: AR, FL, LA, MS, AL, KY, NC and SC.

Yes, and while he’s argued cases as the Texas Solicitor General and as an appellate lawyer in private practice at the Supreme Court (and won some), he’s not a trial lawyer. The Texas case requires a good trial lawyer team. Though Cruz could certainly make opening and closing arugments as a member of the Texas team (assuming that the Texas Solicitor General, and all the other joined states’ solicitors general, defer to him).

I can’t think of a better person than Ted Cruz to present this case! He was my first choice for President in 2016 and I hope he runs again, not meaning Pence is doing a great job. Trump far surpassed my expectations anyway.

Aliens are here to restore the Grizzly Bear to California, they want to drive out all the progressives so that they may fish in peace.

Constitutional Carry!
If the aliens can carry, so should we.
yup.

Pennsylvania was the stronger case and lost. The Texas case almost certainly is going to fail. They have successfully stolen the election. What do we do now? Specifically and practically please.

The Pennsylvania case is not dead. It was only the “emergency injunction” that was denied. The case will proceed on the merits.

While the Electors are supposed to meet next week, there is still time.

The reason the blue nanny encouragers constantly voice support for the use of political fiat to dictate behaviors is that they want everyone else to do what they think is right. It’s about control, not results. They need official policy to validate their virtue.

For the slice of people that are geeks and sci-fi nerds, it’d really up the excitement for the next Trek convention. I think the rest of the population would become obsessed w/ the aliens in the same manner they have been about Beyoncé and the Kardashians.

Scott, when I was growing up in Houston, we had Beer Barns around town. Drive up alcohol. Pull in, place your order, they load up your truck, and off you go. I think it was decided it was a bad idea in the late 80s.

Our local beer distributor when I was a kid was a Morton building that you’d just drive into. Tell the guy what you wanted, and he’d walk over to pallet and grab it for you, put it in the trunk…or in our case, the back of the ’74 AMC Matador Ambassador Brougham Wagon.

First time I legally bought beer it went into my brand new to me, ’55 Studebaker Conestoga.
Hitchhiked from Ca to Ohio, found out being 18 was legal to buy beer.

NC outbanks (OBX) has several “Brew-Thru’s” that are driver thru alcoholic beverage stores with coolers on both sides and often scantily clad attendants loading you up.

While you can’t pull through at the beer distributors anymore (I think they banned retail sales there, not just drive-through retail sales), there is a drive-through liquor store half a mile from my house. Which is a little different from the drive-through daiquiri shops in New Orleans.

“I didn’t even know Russell Brand was trying…”
Yes he is, very trying, very trying indeed, and don’t get me started on that Oliver creature.
As always, we’re terribly sorry about Piers Morgan.

Apologising for him is pretty much a reflex.
In fact, I met and had a very brief chat with Morgan when he was a guest at a function I was supervising at Hampton Court a couple of years back. He was easily the most pleasant guest I met that night, which did make me wonder if it’s all an act….

Your last question is a good one.
They say if it bleeds we read.
Maybe if they fart we notice the smell?

GROWL, the horror, the horror of the election CORUPTION!

  1. “If you want to grow old as a pilot, you’ve got to know when to push it, and when to back off.” ~Chuck Yeager

Tuesday, December 8 = “safe harbor” deadline for appointing presidential Electors (the electors are seeded)
The Texas Supreme Court filing against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin claims Constitutional violations of the

  • the elector’s clause, which asserts that State Legislators must make the rules governing election procedures,
  • equal protection clause, which means that all precincts must abide by the same rules, and
  • due process

This particular case is outcome determinant for the Presidential Election.

That word you couldn’t recall is “safe harbor”. It refers to: if there were disputes and they have been dealt with per state laws and election procedures, then they are considered to be closed. This really does not apply to this scenario because there are open disputes at the state level(s) and in the federal courts and in the Supreme Court.

Scott: Harrumph, Harrumph, Harrumph? Are you now working for Mel Brooks?
Steve: The plane Check Yeager was a NF-104A. It was modified to train astronauts with an rocket motor & reaction control jets.
Fun fact: The Mirage-III was designed to have a liquid fueled rocket engine to provide more power for speed & rate of climb for bomber interception.
Seems like Tim ‘The Tool-Man’ Taylor may be part French.

One of my favorite memes: If the first lockdown worked. . . why is a second lockdown necessary? If the first lockdown didn’t work. . . why is a second lockdown necessary?

Signs, not science. Their master provides them with signs, but the octagonal one is not one of them.

They will say because some of us, like me, refused to take it seriously , the bearings will continue until obedience is achieved.

Bearings? Work to restore the Grizzly Bear to California. That will bring on some serious Bearings, might even be enough to drive the progressive shiites out of the state.
The only downside would be increased competition for salmon, steelhead and hippie chicks.
And a hungry bear ought to enjoy an ice cream flavored Speaker!

I would add: If masks work, why do we need to “Social Distance”? If “Social Distancing” works, why do we need to wear masks?

Leave a Reply