Debate over Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill divides sharply along political lines. The Left brands it the “Don’t Say Gay” bill — a provably false assertion. Is the legislation really just an effort by Republicans to prevent adult perverts from using the safety and truth engendered by the classroom to prey on the minds and the bodies of children?
Membership unlocks access to a vibrant community of committed conservatives who run their own blog and forums. Test drive Membership for 30 days for as little as $9.95. If you don’t love meeting these like-minded people, we’ll rapidly and cheerfully refund your money. Just click the big green button above. If you’d just like to encourage this work, without joining, use the big blue button to make a one-time or recurring contribution with PayPal or credit card. Thank you.
Listen to the Audio Version
25 replies on “Stop the Grooming: Does Florida ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill Actually Aim to Halt Sex Predators?”
I do fear that there’s a large segment of the population who have already swallowed the line that exposing (no pun intended) small children to sexual topics is a responsible thing to do. My daughter raised her two boys in a somewhat sheltered way, but by the time her daughter was born several years later she’d become much more into woke orthodoxy. Ironically, while her husband (a pediatrician) has forbidden their 9 year old daughter to have any access to the internet to protect her innocence, his wife has had very frank conversations with her since she was tiny, about all kinds of things that look very similar to what these teachers on TikTok are showing. My daughter thinks it’s good parenting. And from conversations with her friends, she’s not alone. It’s only marginally better (in my opinion) for a parent to desensitize their young child in the name of enlightenment. Yes, it’s the parent’s right to teach their child what they feel is best, however that assumes a parent is not brainwashed themselves into Leftist woke orhodoxy.
It gave me chills to see a video of Pete Buttigieg’s partner leading a group of kids at camp in a “Pledge of Allegiance” to the Rainbow Flag to wild applause by the adults and the media. It reminded me of the video of Kindergartners chanting about Pres. Obama. The Left uses brazen grooming tactics to great effect, and parents don’t see the danger because they’ve also been groomed to accept what’s happening.
Jesus told us that Satan’s useful idiots are better at perpetrating evil than DECENT people are at doing decent things.
I grew up gay in west London in the 1980s, at a time when the Conservative government had passed a law preventing local authorities from promoting homosexuality (Clause 28). I supported that law as I’d seen leftist teachers at my school abusing their role and actually pushing a ‘gay’ agenda, even back then. Some “Loony Left” councils had the same agenda. It’s interesting to see the same tunes being sung by American lefties opposing the anti-grooming bill, as their British comrades did in the ’80s. They immediately claim the bill says far more than it does. The British equivalent of “don’t say gay” was to shriek loudly that Cause 28 would stop libraries stocking the works of Oscar Wilde etc. Of course, it did no such thing. Although the law was on the books for two decades there were never any actions bought, but it did calm down the wilder excesses of the Labour councils.
I never had any problem with accepting my sexuality, bar one. I had a HUGE problem with the close public association of being gay and leftist, anti-patriotic politics. It wasn’t until I joined the Young Conservatives and met (quite a lot of) other gay conservatives that I realised that gay did not equal leftist. Today we have figures like Douglas Murray, David Starkey, Darren Grimes, and Dave Rubin. That wasn’t the case in the ’80s.
For a century Cultural Marxists and their fellow travellers have used pretended concern for gay men and lesbians as part of their campaign against western society. Once the majority of folk adopted Steve’s small ‘l’ libertarian attitude on sexuality they had to move on to other, ever more outré elements of human sexuality and, of course “gender identity”. I’m always reminded of the Simpson’s episode where the guys on the passing gay pride float chant “We’re here! We’re queer! Get used to it!”. To which Lisa shouts back. “You do this every year, we ARE used to it!”.
The reaction to the Florida bill, which to me seems perfectly reasonable and is clearly necessary (the bill that is, not the reaction) shows it’s on target. The LKGBTQ+ agenda is real, and is nothing to do with the wishes or concerns ordinary gay people. As history teaches us, gay people do not do well in actual Marxist societies. It is in all our interests, straight, gay or inbetweenies, to resist this. When they’re actually using pre-school kids, it’s not just in our interests, it’s a moral duty.
PART THREE: But oh. What to do about those pesky voters catching on to our rigged 2020 election?! I know! Why bother with them or their free will when you can distract them with climate change, racism, LGBT and fearmongering while you change their DNA unbeknownst to them with annual vaccines forced upon them using digital passports, digital currency and ESG social credit scores as leverage to force each and every global slave…er….I mean citizen….to accept and do anything you say?
Ladies and gentlemen, may I present to you Dr. Yuval Noah Harari of the World Economic Forum (I just call him Dr. Evil. If the shoe fits…):
Is Klaus Schwab the Most Dangerous Man in the World?
https://youtu.be/6G3nWyoQ5CQ
Dr. Evil talking about editing our DNA (I’ve seen claims that the current “vaccines” do this)…
https://youtu.be/6G3nWyoQ5CQ?t=207
Dr. Evil saying free will is a thing of the past…
https://youtu.be/6G3nWyoQ5CQ?t=721
I encourage you to watch the entire 15-minute video. It illustrates how the WEF controls the markets through BlackRock which owns—among its $10 TRILLION worth of assets—15% or thereabouts of every single company in the S&P 500.
The video also lists some of the graduates of the WEF’s young global leaders program demonstrating the extent to which they influence countries and markets around the world. The article cited below describing the Davos 2022 meeting does the same:
“In 1992 Klaus Schwab established an offshoot from the World Economic Forum, a school named Global Leaders for Tomorrow. It was subsequently reorganized and renamed the Young Global Leaders Forum in 2004. To be accepted as a “student” one must be under 38 years old, and there is a rigorous selection process to be admitted. Those who are accepted serve six years of training.
As of 2021, there are more than 1,300 graduates of the (WEF) school. Among them are:
Class of 1992: Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy, Lawrence Summer, and Tony Blair;
Class of 1993: Bill Gates, Niall Ferguson, Larry Page (co-founder of Google), Gavin Newsom, Jimmy Wales (co-founder of Wikipedia), and Peter Thiel (co-founder of PayPal).
Other graduates: Mark Zuckerberg (founder of Facebook), French President Emmanuel Macron, Pierre Trudeau, Peter Buttigieg, Hillary Clinton’s gal-pal Huma Abedin, Poppy Allonby (head of BlackRock in Europe, the Middle East and Africa), Garlin Gilchrist II (Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s deputy since 2019), and Jens Spahn (German Minister of Health since 2018)”
Pierre Trudeau is a graduate as well, and Chrystia Freeland, Finance Minister for Trudeau who just sought to ban the use of unregulated cryptocurrency, sits on the Board of Trustees for the WEF.
Surprised yet? I was.
Source: “Davos 2022—Why are Sovereign Governments Still Listening to these Imperial Failures?” by Robert Ingraham
https://www.larouchepac.com/davos_2022_why_are_sovereign_governments_still_listening_to_these_imperial_failures
Aaaaand the cherry on top…CCP President Xi Jinping was the keynote speaker in Davos this year (2022). Another speaker despite all of his probable crimes against humanity?
Dr. Anthony Fauci.
While I suspected it beforehand, I knew for certain the establishment didn’t care about us as American citizens the minute they refused to challenge the results of the 2020 election. This solidified it even further. Going back, there are videos of both Clintons and Bush and Obama singing the praises of the new world order, a phrase which seemed innocuous at the time.
These people are fascists, and they want control over your children. And that’s why they want to teach gender fluidity to your kindergartener topped off with America is a country built by slaves on stolen land and therefore irredeemable (Zinn Education Project, 1619 Project, BLM curriculum).
Why you ask? They’re looking forward to a 5G future and transhumanism with AI and four other top technologies that the Chinese are trying to corner which will change the world. While we’re focused on trans issues and gender fluidity being taught in schools, they’re deciding how to chip all of us.
https://welovetrump.com/2022/03/15/when-humans-become-cyborgs-a-glimpse-into-the-world-economic-forums-transhumanist-agenda/
It only happens though if we allow ESG social credit scores to creep into our banking system. A number of states have already introduced legislation banning it. Fixing our education system so that the next generation is not indoctrinated to accept the globalist agenda is just as important.
The evil fascist establishment comprised of the Democrat Party and RINO’s needs to be pushed off a cliff this November never to be seen nor heard from again. They and their attempted coup deserve a death sentence delivered at the ballot box. We need to strip every last one of their power and wealth and should have them work the drive thru. All are part of the globalist fascist machine seeking the Great Reset through the World Economic Forum.
PART TWO:
As far as proof of the existence of the gay agenda which the LGBT mafia refuses to acknowledge…
Example #1…1972:
Here’s an article from Harvard professor Michael Bronski outlining the progressive gay agenda from the 1970’s as presented to to the Democratic National Convention in Miami in 1972, an agenda which, among other things, wants to get rid of the nuclear family—just like Marxist BLM founded by self-avowed Marxists—and have them raise your children in school or in person starting at a very young age. It dismisses the role of parents as “bourgeois” providing further evidence that they’ve always looked down upon us condescendingly as irredeemable “deplorables.” It also states that they assume, incorrectly, that people are born gay based solely on their say so and anecdotal experience.
“When Gays Wanted to Liberate Children”
https://bostonreview.net/articles/michael-bronski-gay-family/
“If many of Gay Men’s Liberation’s demands remain controversial forty-five years later, most are also still legible in today’s political discourse: the group sought to end U.S. imperialism, prevent discrimination based on sexual identity, and abolish the police. These all remain live demands of many radicals on the left. Demand six, however, is likely to strike even many of today’s activists as irresponsible, bizarre, and dangerous:
“…Even recalling what we know about the radical nature of the 1960s, it can be difficult to appreciate that child liberation was not a fringe idea…”
How much you wanna bet a fair number of these 70’s activists are intertwined in the Biden administration in one way or another?
By the way—shock of shocks—the “elite” professor is clearly a fan of the gay agenda to destroy the family and care for children themselves. He excuses it, of course, by citing their good intentions and the “oppression” gays have suffered:
“The strategies, and theoretical approaches, of Gay Liberation concerning children were complex and politically complicated. They ranged from the practical to the impossible. They were driven by earnest care for children as well as a desire to radically break from the gridlock of oppressive family structures. At heart, all of these diverse moves—from identifying the existence of gay kids, to caring for children, to destroying the legal framework that allowed parents to “own” children—were not only attempts by Gay Liberationists to remake the world, but to heal decades of wounds inflicted by society and in particular by queer people’s biological families.”
Example #2…2009:
Here’s a 2009 article from a Northeaster University School of Law professor questioning the gay agenda’s use of civil rights as a shield as well as their trying to normalize themselves within the construct of marriage thus perpetuating the concept. It also mentions gender theory, cousin to critical race theory born out of Marxism which allows people to ignore science in pursuit of their agenda:
Libby Adler, The Gay Agenda, 16 MICH. J. GENDER & L. 147 (2009).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjgl/vol16/iss1/3
Examples #3 and #4…2022:
Here’s Joe Biden pledging to restrict aid to countries who don’t follow the globalist agenda:
“Biden’s Global LGBT Agenda – The American Conservative”
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/bidens-global-lgbt-agenda/
Wouldn’t you know it? Beijing Joe Biden is dutifully following the instructions of the globalists at the World Economic Forum just as he does with equity and climate change.
Here’s the World Economic Forum globalist agenda for “inclusivity” as it relates to LGBT:
https://fortune.com/2015/01/23/davos-gay-rights/
https://reports.weforum.org/outlook-global-agenda-2015/global-leadership-and-governance/the-road-to-equality/?doing_wp_cron=1647567576.1450400352478027343750
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/archive/lgbti-inclusion
nt
PART ONE: The gay agenda IS A BUNCH OF CRAP, and it’s way past time for us to go on the offensive and start mocking people who push it. The LGBT mafia have been pushing this for decades while saying, “Agenda? What agenda?! Don’t be ridiculous!,” and now the results are here despite all the warnings people tried to give.
It’s time to start slaying the sacred cows of the communist agenda with mockery and contempt, even a few sneers…climate change, pandemics and “equity” primarily in the form of systemic racism and the LGBT agenda currently disguised as “trans rights.”
And to be abundantly clear, we are not anti-this or denying that. Don’t fall victim to the Four Strawmen of the Wokepocalypse…Anti, Phone, Ist and Denier. State boldly and clearly that you are anti-tyranny not anti-compassion.
Then whip out your trusty 12-gauge of freedom with “Liberty and Justice for All” emblazoned on the barrel and blow an enormous hole right through each of their strawmen sending each to the glue factory (or burn pile if you will).
Of course, anyone who opposed what the LGBT mafia was doing all these years was dismissed as…wait for it…a hateful bigot (demonization) or …wait for it…a “conspiracy theorist” or “overwrought Christian” (discreditation) for daring to raise the idea that there was a “gay agenda.” With regard to the latter, the gay community and their media accomplices continue to mock us today as if no gay agenda exists.
Same formula for climate change. Same formula for systemic racism. Same formula for the manufactured pandemic…pretend they don’t have an agenda and demonize or discredit their opposition as a climate-denier, racist or anti-vaxxer (all strawmen as no one holds those positions, just like no one is “anti-gay”) while the leftist media-entertainment-academic complex supports their cause with unfounded studies “verified” by a corrupt peer review process and disinformation masquerading as science.
Here’s a perfect example. Note the total lack of substance. References are made to studies, but no context and no details. How many people were included? What questions were asked? Under what conditions? How was their conclusion reached? Etc. Pretty much “because we said so.”
Also note the assumption that we’re all still criminalizing and marginalizing gay people along with the assumption that the majority of society felt that way in 1950.
“How psychology has helped society accept homosexuality”
https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/ptn/2018/05/society-accept-homosexuality
People were not “born gay.” Literally no evidence for that yet they continue to insist upon it.
Just like they insist that vaccines and masks work despite the evidence.
Just like they insist upon systemic racism so systemic there are no concrete examples.
Just like they insist upon Darwinian evolution from bacteria to plants to apes to humans with a broken fossil record and no missing link (similarity in building materials (DNA) is not evidence).
Just like they insist we’re all in danger of a global meltdown when the polar ice caps are increasing in size along with the polar bear population.
Just like they have no explanation for the origin of life pr the universe yet act like Christ as the author of life and the universe never appeared to eyewitnesses and no one reliably wrote it down. By far the best and most logical explanation, yet we’re just crazy, unreasoning Christians.
But oh. That pesky science. Why bother when you’re so smart that you know what you’re doing is right?!
“Critical theory, Marxist-inspired movement in social and political philosophy originally associated with the work of the Frankfurt School. Drawing particularly on the thought of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud, critical theorists maintain that a primary goal of philosophy is to understand and to help overcome the social structures through which people are dominated and oppressed.
****Believing that science, like other forms of knowledge, has been used as an instrument of oppression, they caution against a blind faith in scientific progress,****
…arguing that scientific knowledge must not be pursued as an end in itself without reference to the goal of human emancipation. Since the 1970s, critical theory has been immensely influential in the study of history, law, literature, and the social sciences.”
In other words, the communists believe that we won’t notice that they’ve allowed themselves to ignore facts in order to remake society and correct social “inequalities” whether these inequalities exist or not. They’re doing this with systemic racism, gender theory, climate change and this stupid shamdemic where science was an afterthought at best.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/critical-theory
It’s no surprise that the Supreme Court’s legalization of gay marriage was not based upon science:
The Supreme Court Legalizes Gay “Marriage”
“Justice Kennedy presented the majority opinion of the court as follows: “The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity.” He then argues that the petitioners for same-sex marriage have been previously denied this liberty. He makes these claims on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees that any citizen’s rights to life, liberty, and property will not be taken away without due process, as well as “equal protection of the laws.”
This amendment was ratified in 1868 and its primary concern is clearly not the free expression of personal identity but rather the citizenship of “all persons born or naturalized in the United States.” This phrase is the very first in the amendment and is clearly meant to include emancipated slaves as citizens and to ensure their consequent rights as such. Nevertheless, Justice Kennedy interprets this to mean that the states cannot pass laws to limit the liberty of citizens’ self-expression.”
https://www.hli.org/resources/supreme-court-legalizes-gay-marriage/
And now we have everyone telling us…without citing any science….that peopl are “born gay.” They are not. THERE IS NO GAY GENE.
Here’s the study of 500,000 people summarized in Scientific American which disproves the gay gene theory despite the opposition in the article whose objections can be summed up as, “Well we don’t believe it. Therefore, it isn’t true.” Other studies have involved subjects numbers in the hundreds.
“Massive Study Finds No Single Genetic Cause of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior – Scientific American”
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/massive-study-finds-no-single-genetic-cause-of-same-sex-sexual-behavior/#
Now we are dealing with an LGBT mafia insisting upon a “gender spectrum” which again, not surprisingly, is not rooted in science or fact.
Again, they are tyrants being used by even bigger tyrants. They don’t care about being rooted in science or fact. They care only about power, and you’re not in their club.
So, Gay Pride is an evil description. Let the kids figure it out for themselves. They will. But not in kindergarten.
We should never say or use the phrase “Don’t say gay.” Whenever you use that phrase, it just reinforces the Left’s branding and misrepresentation. Call it anything else you want but, don’t call it that. Don’t give them power.
This is just a piece of the globalist, fascist agenda, and the more this is ignored, the more frustrated I become. Biden just advocated for all banks to follow ESG when making loans, and the big banks have publicly stated that they won’t make loans for fossil fuel exploration.
We were told by gay militants that we’re bigots if we had any bias towards homosexuals. As a society we shrugged and said “OK, we don’t really care what you do as long as it doesn’t harm anyone else.”
We were told it’s none of our business what goes on in people’s bedrooms. As a society we shrugged and said “OK, we don’t really care what you do as long as it doesn’t harm anyone else.”
We were told that who someone chooses to love is none of our concern. As a society we shrugged and said “OK, we don’t really care what you do as long as it doesn’t harm anyone else.”
We were told that gay people only wanted the same rights as everyone else had, even though what they were demanding was more rights than everyone else had. Because everyone had the right to marry exactly one person of the opposite sex, gay marriage is a “right” above and beyond the rights everyone else had. Things were beginning to smell a little bit peculiar but still some in our society shrugged and said “OK, we don’t really care what you do as long as it doesn’t harm anyone else.”
In this process there were promises made. One of the big ones is “We’re not going to come after your kids, we just want to be left alone and not discriminated against”.
Yeah, right.
Here’s the thing … I don’t care about a gay person’s sexual orientation as long as I don’t have to deal with it. I don’t force anyone to deal with my heterosexual orientation either. Heterosexuality is the norm by a huge percentage of the population. Being normal is not “shoving anything in someone’s face”, it’s just being normal. All the people who do not wear outlandish clothes and dye their hair pink, purple or blue vastly outnumber those who do such things. They’re not shoving their normality in the faces of those outlying personalities, they’re just being normal. If you want to be different, that’s on you.
I had a gay sister-in-law whom I loved dearly. She was a very nice person, fun to hang out with and I always thought highly of her. She didn’t get in my face about her gay orientation and knew that was the one area of her life I disapproved of but was willing to overlook. There are no doubt areas of my life she didn’t approve of and was willing to overlook to the same degree.
She would sometimes come over to our house with her “friend” of the moment. They didn’t make out on the couch in front of everyone, I never walked into the kitchen to find her and her “friend” swapping spit, they simply behaved themselves the same way I and my wife would were we guests at anyone else’s house. They respected our home and family and we respected them as people.
We all knew what time it was but none of us were disrespectful of the other enough to make an issue of it. I didn’t have to deal with my sister-in-law’s homosexuality because she never made an issue of it any more than I did my heterosexuality. It was a private thing as it should be for both of us.
In my experience most homosexual people are this way and do not care for all the gay militancy crap.
So when you get in my face, march down the street (mostly or totally) naked doing obscene things in a “gay pride” parade, try to teach my kids or grandkids that homosexuality is not only legitimate but something to advocate for, bring up sex of any sort outside your educational purview of clinical, scientific, factual information, or do anything else that forces me to deal with your problem, and it is your problem not mine …
You have no right to complain when my attitude towards you changes from a benign neutrality to an openly hostile nature.
Nice blend of Shylock and Niemöller at the onset of this. ( I am confident you will get both references!)
Our souls are being stolen in the same way the ocean takes the sand; very slowly but unrelenting.
Constant vigilance is needed and I commend not only Gov DeSantis, but the Florida legislature.
To expand on this idea of “We just want the same rights as everyone else,” the Left always make the claim that straight people can marry whomever they want so, why should gays also be able to?
However, there are MANY restrictions on who straight people can marry even among the opposite sex. You can’t marry your mother or father, sister or brother, or first cousins. You also can’t marry your neighbor’s wife (or husband) and you can’t marry ANYONE if you are already married. You even have to take blood test to make sure you’re compatible. Furthermore, you can’t marry someone that doesn’t want to marry you – otherwise I’d be married to Nicole Kidman or Katherine Heigl. It’s a false claim to say that everyone else can marry whomever they want.
As you say, homosexuals have exactly the same rights as heterosexuals. They (homosexuals) are demanding more – and have gotten more.
This idea that accosting children, no matter the purpose whether to groom them for sexual purposes or any other, being wrong and punishable is an old one. It’s been around for a long time and there’s good reasons for that.
It has only been recently that has changed.
Tanya Tucker released a song in 1973 titled “What’s your Momma’s Name?” It’s about a guy that encountered a girl who he thought might be his daughter and “offered her a nickle’s worth of candy if she’d tell” (her mother’s name). In the song the guy “lost a month of life and labor to the county jail” for doing that.
In the day that song was released everyone understood why a guy might go to jail for accosting a little girl and offering her a bribe of candy. It had nothing to do with sex. You just don’t go around messing with kids, period.
That’s how much we used to protect our kids.
It’s a shame on our society that we now have people who are so morally polluted that they use “the right thing” as a feeble excuse to mess with little kids. It’s even more shameful and frightening that it has become an imperative necessity to codify laws to prevent them from doing such things and that there are significant fractions of our society that would loudly not only protest the adoption of such laws but lie about the truth of those laws in an attempt to defeat them.
Too many people think they know better how to raise the village’s kids than the parents who are actually responsible for them.
The teacher in the first clip Steve played for Scott seemed to have that opinion. “I have something I need to teach but I’m not exactly allowed, so I have to find a way around the blocks to teach this thing because I know better.”
Democrats = Groomers
To address Steve’s closing comment, I thought that the Antifa & BLM terrorizimg of people’s neighborhoods would get addressed the not so nice way when the nice way failed. And I was dead wrong. Here’s hoping that the nice way happens this time.
A couple places the not nice way was used, and the people using it were prosecuted. Kyle R, the couple in STL, MO. A few were not prosecuted, but they were already dead.
Those were legit cases of self defense – what I’m thinking of (and I think that Steve is implying) is vigilanteism (sp). While I wouldn’t shed any tears if some of these thugs got a visit at their moms’ basements, it would also be a huge step toward society completely breaking down. Anybody hoping for that isn’t thinking through what the reaction would be – 1/6 should give some ideas. And if the government’s reaction oversteps enough to create a nationwide backlash by the normals, then the Democrats wil have officially started their second Civil War.
On a lighter note, when Little Bob was a preschooler we would go to the library to pick out movies. Sister Babe would smack me whenever I picked up the DVD of the animated Hercules movie and would ask Little Bob, “Do you like movies about gladiators?”
Sister Babe sounds like my kind of gal! 😉
Teach the kids how to read, speak, and do math.
Our schools have enough trouble doing their basic jobs.
We as citizens need to stand up to this degeneracy. If we do not the we will loose everything we care about, especially the next generation.
Thank you, Bill, for mentioning the event that I watched on CSPAN where VP Joe Biden was to be “swearing in” some new politicians. He went from hovering over all the pre-teens, with his hands on their shoulders, sniffing their hair and making dumb comments like , “Oh! your not engaged yet?” The pre-teens, and some of the mothers looked somewhat horrified, but only one of the gutless politicos moved his daughter to his side. The woman commenter was a “body language” expert and even she was shocked at his behavior in public with such young girls. Again, thank you because I have never seen any commentary on that event. It was a disgusting display by “pedo” Scranton Joe!