If you won’t date a transgender person, you’re a transphobic hater. Which is why you’ll be happy to hear that there’s a new name for you — Superstraight. If you can’t beat the identity-politics people — join them!
Bill Whittle’s Moving Back to America is a production of our Members, who fund it and operate their own content creation machine. Become a Member now.
Video below hosted at Rumble.
29 replies on “SUPERSTRAIGHT: If You Can’t Beat the Identity-Politics People — Join Them!”
The Mock Kills The Woke…
If people I am talking to want to get into that stuff, I just tell them that I am transgendered too. I am a Lesbian trapped in a man’s body. (Thank you Rush for that one) They are usually so occupied by their head exploding that I can walk serenely away!
That is superb! I will remember that one! Thanks!
Tragically my guns were also lost in a boating accident. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it for all of those out there threatening violence against this superstraight social malefactor. Really……I’m completely defenseless.
Damn dog drug all my guns off
I proudly identify as “Superstraight” I have a healthy affinity towards real women…all the charm, intellegence and nurturing skills I hold in great requard and respect. There are exceptions of course, like those shopping in Pajamas, dirty sweatshirt with the “washer woman” hair pulled up in a nest with a rubber band. Oh, did I mention dirty rubber “crocks” or carpet slippers? Or how about the fragrance as they pass by, a combo of a dirty close hamper and ash tray! Sorry, these do not qualify as true women to me, simply female. Perhaps this could be a new female subset to protest for, those that simply choose to roll out of bed in the morning and head out the door with no further ado needed. And if you are offended by our appearance and smell, tough luck! We will protest very loudly in front of your local store (walmart) until you give in to our demands! Sick!
One of the many reasons I only shop Wal-Mart when I have to.
I tire of the lack mentality and questionable hygiene habits of some of the walmart frequent flyers.
Ridicule is a spectacular weapon, especially with epople as thin skinned as your typical Radical Leftist. A great example was with the Westboro Baptist Church. Remember those a**hats? They had a nice scam going until they made the mistake of protesting Comicon back in 2010. It did not end well for them…
https://comicsalliance.com/super-heroes-vs-the-westboro-baptist-church/
I remember those Westboro people protesting at the funeral of veterans. I happily joined with Patriot Riders and other veteran biker clubs to hold up American flags and sing so the families couldn’t hear the slurs nor see their signs.
I remember when the founder of Westboro died and they asked people to respect their privacy during that difficult time — thus displaying their hypocrisy for all the world to see.
YT banned this episode?
edit: now appeared along with the 2 new videos.
I’d be more surprised if they didn’t ban this video
A good self test is the (full-on) trans woman Blaire White: stunningly beautiful and a conservative. If you are still not attracted then you are #SuperStraight! (unlike her boyfriend).
Hey! That’s how I order my Whisky!
Or that great t-shirt I saaw years back – “I like my women the way I like my coffee… ground up and in the freezer!” =8^)
Yuck! Was Jeffrey Dahmer wearing it?
Dahmer preferred hot dogs…
Bill’s opening about gun knowledge/ownership seems less out of the blue in the context of the closing segment which identifies the seething death threats from our tolerant betters on the left. Which leads to two options. Option 1: the lefty threat-slinger is an unemployed, undesirable soyboy spewing invective from his mom’s basement, and thus feels emboldened by internet anonymity and existential angst, or Option 2: the lefty means every word of their diatribe, in which case, well, if mr. threat-slinger is foolish enough to threaten the health or life of mr. gun-slinger, well, I know where I’d put my money.
Hahaha. I didn’t have a trendy term for it, but I made this same claim years ago.
I’m not Superstraight, though I’m sure I fit Bill’s definition thereof. I’m normal …
Copy/Paste directly of the Merriam-Webster Definition of normal —
1 a : conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern : characterized by that which is considered usual, typical, or routine
b : according with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, procedure, or principle
2 : occurring naturally
3 a : approximating the statistical average or norm
b : generally free from physical or mental impairment or dysfunction : exhibiting or marked by healthy or sound functioning
People who take exception and make objection to my normalcy are NORMOPHOBICS.
Title of article on the front page at PJ Media today:
‘Normal’ Is the New N-WordAs for me, I like my women like I like my Lagvulin. I am also super. Therefore, I will embrace my SuperStraight awesomeness.
Yeah, me too on all of the above. My point was that long before Bill came up with “Superstraight” there was a suitable word already in the dictionary … “Normal”. So I still maintain that people who consider ‘Normal’ the new “N-Word” are Normophobes.
I’ve coined a term from Kurt Schlichter and now take it a step further. I never refer to our side as Republicans or Conservatives, but rather as the Normals.
On the filp side, I never refer to Democrats as anything other than Radical Leftists. No point in (pardon the pun) normalizing their toxic culture.
Excellent!
I refuse to adopt a new label, like superstraight, to fit into a crowd of confused and mentally-deranged individuals. The fundamental designs of the human plumbing do not support the idiocy of the abnormal, so I proudly retain my label as normal and brand all who fear me as normophobes.
Exactly so. To adopt a “new” label applied for ourselves is to cede the high ground to the abnormal. It gives them traction and a handle to use against the normal. Then they can say “I hate these Superstraights and want to kill all of them” as Bill demonstrated above by posting examples in this video.
If they really want to push the issue then let them say “I hate NORMAL people and want to kill all of them” — Which is the truth and much more closely resembles their true position.
Rather let us be the new label creators and apply the label “Normophobic” to them instead..
Then start demanding that anyone who tweets or twoots or twangs or twimpers “I hate normal people and want to kill them all” be brought to account for their violence abetting hate speech.
Which would be the normal thing to do.
The other side does this kind of thing all the time. I.E. naming a neo-Marxist post-modernist organization “Black Lives Matter” inhibits people from speaking out against it. If we insist that we are the “Normals” and refer to ourselves as such the same sort of purpose is served but with accuracy and truth.
Let them battle ‘normal’ and when their inevitable reply is “What’s your definition of ‘normal’?” … We can simply point to the dictionary as I have done above.
Why should we not be as proud of the label “Normal” as any Queer or Trans is proud of what and who they are? Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
It is a huge mistake to abandon the word “Normal” and allow the other side to create and define a “new normal”.
This is how you use language as a weapon and it’s high time we got smart about this because the other side are masters at it.
This can ruin your whole day if you’re super straight!
—
I met her in a club down in old Soho
Where you drink champagne and it tastes just like Coca-Cola
C-O-L-A, Cola
She walked up to me and she asked me to dance
I asked her her name and in a dark brown voice she said Lola
L-O-L-A, Lola
La-la-la-la Lola
Well, I’m not the world’s most physical guy
But when she squeezed me tight she nearly broke my spine, oh my Lola
La-la-la-la Lola
Well, I’m not dumb but I can’t understand
Why she walked like a woman but talked like a man, oh my Lola
La-la-la-la Lola
La-la-la-la Lola
Now don’t go interjecting pop culture references from (checks calendar – 50 years ago [damn, I am old]) as if they have meaning in today’s society. Clearly we have always lived in a society that treated all Lola’s as outcasts. / sarc
In my senior year of high school my Religion teacher had a pet fish in his classroom named Jonah. A buddy and I wrote a song about the fish to the tune of Lola, plenty of cringeworthy lyrics (I’m not dumb but I just can’t “capisce” why he talked like a woman but swam like a fish O my Jonah…)
While most of what we wrote is long lost, but I’m still proud of the closing line that I wrote,
Well I’d left home just a week before, and I’d never been with a fish before, well Jonah smiled took my by the fin, said “I’m sorry son but sodomy is a sin”
Of course. we’re now probably a year or two away from being against sodomizing animals becoming a cancellable offense
where the men are men and the sheep are nervous. . is a really old line.