Categories
Right Angle

“TASER TASER TASER”: How a Police Officer Shot a Man She Meant to Merely Shock

Daunte Wright is dead. Officer Kim Potter, a 26-year veteran, ends her career, along with her Brooklyn Center (MN) Police Chief Tim Gannon.

Daunte Wright is dead. Officer Kim Potter, a 26-year veteran, ends her career, along with her Brooklyn Center (MN) Police Chief Tim Gannon. And the rest of us struggle to understand how, in a moment, in the heat of action, a police officer shot a man she meant to merely shock — while shouting “TASER TASER TASER”.

Stephen Green, Scott Ott and Bill Whittle analyze breaking news in the context of timeless principles 20 times each month on Right Angle, thanks to our Members. Join us now.

Video below hosted at Rumble

Listen to the Audio Version

44 replies on ““TASER TASER TASER”: How a Police Officer Shot a Man She Meant to Merely Shock”

I don’t think there can be any doubt that Daunte Wright materially contributed to his own demise, nor argument made that he was some sort of innocent man minding his own business. He was wanted on a warrant for armed home invasion robbery where he and his buddy allegedly terrorized a woman at gunpoint in an attempt to steal $820 from her.

Likewise however, there is also no doubt that if we take Officer Kim Potter at her word, and the word of the other officers present, she meant to Tase this guy and not to shoot him fatally.

I recall in days of yore before police officers routinely carried less-than-lethal tools like the Taser — Shooting an armed, or presumably armed, felony suspect fleeing arrest was within the bounds of both law and policy. If you don’t want to get shot, don’t run away from the cop because you can’t outrun bullets.

Obviously that’s changed because now there are less-than-lethal means of assuring an arrest. But the question remains, really how big a deal is this?

I’m sorry Officer Potter made this mistake and I’m sorry and saddened that it’s going to cost her a long career and maybe her pension.

I do not feel a bit sorry for Daunte Wright, he took a chance, gambled and lost everything. No one forced him to take that gamble. The results of his life are exactly the consequences of his own choices, as is his death. For all we know a high speed pursuit might have resulted in even more injury and death as he sped away in his car. He got what he deserved if not what was intended.

I don’t think Officer Potter should do any jail time over it because at the end of the day, she did society a favor by removing another predator from the wild.

Daunte Wright had demonstrated, even at his young age, that he has no problem with forcing his way into someone’s home and threatening them with death to advance his own concerns. Down that road lies the death of someone and this time it was the right person who died.

He belongs in that hole in the ground, he practically dug it himself. The tragedy here is that he pulled Kimberly Potter down in his own ruin.

I like to point out that Wright was not shot during a traffic stop, he was shot resisting and fleeing from arrest for violation of probation involving a firearm and an assault with a firearm.

Having experience as a 1st aid/cpr instructor and volunteer emergency first responder, something we see in human response to emergencies is “tunnel vision”…Example; an injured person seriously bleeding…the brain snaps “I know how to deal with that!” and a pressure bandage is quickly slapped on, wrapped to maintain pressure, the limb elevated (injuries permitting)… meanwhile, the person isn’t breathing…BIG OOPS!!!

Sometimes “muscle memory” can take over and the brain stops thinking/processing.
The KEY to avoiding this is to NEVER go into autopilot mode… stay aware of the whole picture and keep “thinking”… Never just react… Adrenaline can be your friend or your worst enemy… When I used to teach 1st/aid I used to tell my students, the most important 1st aid tool to have within reach is your brain.

“…You never built that…” – Barack Hussein Obama
Something that comes to mind is the odd blame assignment that the left always manages to adhere to.
Mr. Wright committed multiple crimes and failed to adhere to even vehicular codes, and so, was pulled over. He then resisted and tried to flee as a violent crime suspect and person of interest. Others may have helped pave the road that led to Mr. Wright’s untimely death but he built it.

And the thing is, according to leftists, NOTHING “went wrong.” They apparently truly believe that police departments are set up so that this is supposed to be the way they treat non-whites. That’s why they want to destroy everything.

One final comment from me on this. By now everyone has probably seen the video below and knows the punchline: did you see the gorilla?
https://youtu.be/vJG698U2Mvo
Something like half of all first time viewers who followed the directions to count the number of time the players in white pass pass the ball completely miss the person in the gorilla costume. This isn’t some life or death situation. It could hardly be called stressful. Yet, by just focussing on a particular aspect of the video you can easily miss something as crazy as a guy in a gorilla suit. Given the higher stakes of a perp resisting arrest, is it inconceivable that someone could mistake a Glock for a Taser?
The PowerLine gentlemen are reporting that officer Potter is going to be charged with manslaughter. The relevant text of the law is as follows:

by the person’s culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another

Note the key word consciously. I agree with PowerLine that given the evidence we have already seen that the charge can’t be supported. Of course the jury can always be cowed by the mob so the prosecutor has that going for him.

“…by the person’s culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another…”
Duante Wright’s actions fit that bill.

Regarding “Did you see the gorilla” …

I refuse to believe that any sane, normal, sober person could watch that video and not see the gorilla. I have no trouble believing that someone might be then distracted by the gorilla and lose count of the white T-shirted players ball passes and that would be a good demonstration of how an eyewitness account might be unreliable.

As in —
“How many shots did you see the accused fire?”
“Six shots, sir.”
“And you had your eyes on that firearm and the suspect the entire time the gun was being fired?”
“No sir, a vehicle passed between myself and the accused as he was firing.”
“Ok then you didn’t actually see six shots fired by the accused, you heard six shots and assumed the accused fired all of them.”
“Yes, I suppose that would be a more accurate way to put it.”

This video is like those stupid “unconscious bias” training videos. It ignores the obvious, most likely scenario trying to make a point. Then people go all wonky over it thinking they’ve discovered some profound psychological quirk of human minds.

The actual point is clearly that if you can’t see a freakin’ guy in a gorilla suit casually stroll into the center of camera frame, pause and beat his chest, then walk off the camera frame — You’re an idiot. That’s why comments are disabled on the video you linked to.

I’m not slagging on you, Andrew Alan. Your intent was good just the example was lousy. I’m trying to point out to anyone who watches that kind of thing that it’s not some “ooh, ahh” kind of thing, it’s a bonehead kind of thing. If you don’t see that gorilla you shouldn’t be operating a vehicle, using saws or sharp objects, or anything else where you can hurt yourself or others.

The thing that gets me the most about these police/criminal interactions gone bad is how they are immediately labeled as race-based. I don’t see a “cracker cop” killing a black man for being black. I see a veteran officer who made a terrible mistake for which her life/career will never recover.
Of course this instantly triggers professional basketball players to plaintively ask “when will this killing of black men stop?” I’m absolutely positive that some redneck parolee resisting arrest has been mistakenly killed by an officer of the law. I bet we could even find that happening from a black officer. It shouldn’t happen. It is a tragedy for the family. But categorizing this as racial is not evident.

Used to be the narrative was “white cops killing black men” so we needed more diversity on our police departments. Now standards have been changed so that we have all sorts of nationalities and both (real) sexes in police uniforms and the narrative has shifted to “cops killing black men.” Isn’t it interesting that the one constant in the equation is “black men” in confrontations with police?

“I’m absolutely positive that some redneck parolee resisting arrest has been mistakenly killed by an officer of the law.”
Sure. And I’m absolutely positive that you’ll never hear about it from the media.

Thanks, Bill, for pointing out that emergency situations cloud ones judgement maybe just enough to create errors. A short perusal of NTSB findings amongst even well trained pilots including commercial and private aircraft will verify “pilot error” based on this “adrenalization” happens more times than we would like. Training, cockpit protocol, etc. help “train out” these errors but unfortunately dont completely eliminate them. I’m sure the same applies to bus drivers, orbital telescope lens designers, rubber seal engineers for spacecraft, train engineers, subway train drivers, even thrill ride operators at the fair. It is unfair to say it never happens amongst police and to hold them to a standard of ZERO errors, even though they are trained professionals, just like airline captains, and, yes, even surgeons. It is our hope to prevent all errors, but unfortunately it is not possible. We should strive for perfection, but not persecute those who, in doing their best, fail with unfortunate results, including but not limited to, loss of life. IMHO. There but for the Grace of God go a lot of us….This is a sad event, unfortunately preventable, but an error.

It doesn’t even require adrenalization. Watched an episode of Air Crash Investigation where they were trying to work out why a landing gear light wasn’t working. Both pilot and co-pilot got fixated on the problem of replacing a bulb, nobody realised the auto-pilot had kicked out and the next thing you know they’re in the weeds and doing what Elon might call a ‘rapid unplanned disassembly’.

I don’t understand how the price of big screen TV’s continues to go down even while looting should decrease the supply. Did years of peaceful protests fix the supply chain issues?

The chance of this happening again will only increase if we don’t deal with bias media spin. With all the cameras on them, and the Liberal media narrative of rampant “breedism”, the more likely an officer is going to get overwhelmed in the heat of the moment and make a mistake.  

Honestly, after 26 years on the force, this officer and supervisors should have the knowledge of how they react to the adrenalin in those incidents. Life and death situations are drilled into the officers in training. There is no excuse for utilizing deadly force when it was not the intent. This is at least a manslaughter charge if not murder.
This is probably a symptom of the lack of investment in quality law enforcement, over cost/affirmative action priorities for decades now. Or simply choosing officers that will do what they are told by their “leaders” instead of what is right. This type of incident is not new, just more publicized.
It is tragic, but this shooting was completely preventable. This officer could just have easily shot another officer, or lost control of the firearm in the close quarter situation. Training records and incident reports for this officer should shed light on any past poor performance issues. If not, then there were some significant lapses in accountability by the supervisors. Panicking in this type of situation is not an excuse regardless of the adrenalin for a trained officer of 26 years. Officer training is supposed to address this exact natural reaction to make poor choices and prevent them through alternate options/reactions training scenarios. Panic is the same reason people drown. If the lifeguard panicked like the drowning victim, would they be helping anything?
In my opinion, any training officer in weapons handling would have significant concerns as to how this officer was responding, and handling their weapon in this situation. Even if the officer thought it was their tazer.
Simple question to follow up: How many other officers at this incident had pulled their weapons?

Have you walked a mile in an Officer’s shoes? Don’t recall anything in your comment about responsibility as it concerns citizens living in a so called civil society. Individuals in the Black community have been emboldened by the likes of Obama to resist authority and it is now continuing, especially after the Banana Republic election last November.
But you go ahead and have good cry over the this late Bible scholar. Meanwhile another L.E.O. who went to work that day, much like she had during her 26 years on the force, has now had her life turned upside down all because this individuals Mama didn’t teach him about civility.

Yes, I have walked a mile in those shoes. If this officer was not up to the active field duty anymore; they should have knowingly and willingly left the active part of the service at least. That was what any responsible person would do, when lives are actively at risk as direct part of your duties, just like I did.
The poor choices of this criminal does not justify the poor actions of the officer.
Accountability works both ways.

What about all those experienced pilots that Bill mentioned who feather the wrong prop? Certainly decades of flying experience and training should have inured them the affects of adrenaline and stress, and yet they didn’t. No-one wants to think that they could make the mistake this officer did. Everyone likes to think that they have trained hard enough, worked hard enough, and that training and work guarantee that they won’t make a terrible mistake. So we say this officer must be incompetent. This officer must have gone lax on her training. Maybe. But maybe this just the sort of stupid thing that can happen to anyone; a human design flaw that we can minimize but not eliminate. Maybe this officer just drew the short straw today and there is nothing more to say. Let the facts come out, but so far all we have is a tragedy.
I’ll only add that I’ve trained in martial arts for probably 20 years, on and off, of my life. I teach karate now. When it comes to going hands on with another person, I should come out the winner. But, if there’s one thing that I’ve learned in all my training it is that nothing is 100%. You can do everything right and still lose. You never really know exactly what is going happen if and when the stuff really goes down even if you’ve seen it 100 times before. Humility is always warranted (and you never lose a fight you don’t get into).

Poor choice indicates a choice. Poor response to stress is what happened. She actively “chose” to go to the taser. She failed to actually do so, because of the stress of the situation.

I don’t understand how the other cops, who were closer and ostensibly had him closer to physical control, somehow managed to let him get away.

As for the statement that the poor choices do not justify the poor actions, that is a question best left to a court of law. The poor outcome doesn’t excuse the poor choice, either.

Excellent discussion on the affects of stress and adrenaline. Whenever the brain kicks into survival mode, it becomes very good at filtering out all manner of “superfluous” information. If the officer believed she had drawn her Taser, then it is quite possible that her brain just plain ignored the otherwise obvious facts that the black, Glock shaped thing in her had was not in fact a big yellow Taser. She expected to have a trigger pully thing in the hand and she did; the details of which thingy were superfluous (until they weren’t). Details like whether the suspect was going for a weapon were much more important and that’s likely where her mind was.
I’d guess something that most people have done at least once in their life is drive right through a red light. I’ve done it. I once watched a friend do it as a passenger (there was no cross traffic so I knew I was safe), and then just calmly said “that was a red light”. He was surprised and a little shaken by that. Most intersections have multiple lights so it isn’t like you didn’t see the red light. Something just goes wrong in the brain and through the intersection you go. Unfortunately when the situation involves fighting suspects and firearms, bad things happen. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Just as a data point, a similar instance happened in Oakland roughly 15 years ago. A BART cop pulled his gun rather than a Taser and shot dead a resisting suspect. He was ultimately convicted of negligent homicide and sentenced to 2 years in jail. They rioted just the same in Oakland, but then again riots and Oakland are chocolate and peanut butter (the two great tastes that go great together). I’ll note that in his case the officer failed to follow procedure by not announcing that he was using his Taser, and, while the suspect was resisting, another officer was sitting on him at the time (even a Taser wasn’t called for if you ask me). Those facts contributed to the negligence conviction whereas given what we’ve seen so far, the MN officer did follow procedure and the use of the Taser seemed justified (in my opinion).

What seems to be missing from the discussion is the fact that the underlying dynamics of the police-suspect encounter have been dramatically altered due to the “Defund the Police”, BLM, and other anti-cop agitations. Today’s police are operating in an excessively hostile environment for which, I would guess, they have not had sufficient time or training to adjust. Not excusing Officer Potter, when the chance that the subject of even a routine traffic stop is more likely to resist and, in recent cases, resist with deadly force, it has to have an adverse affect on an officer’s judgment and reaction, despite their level of experience or training. The end result is tragedy for all involved.

No, what’s blaringly missing from this discussion is the responsibilities that parents have neglected for years in raising their offspring to obey the orders of Law Enforcement personnel.

Not only defunding police, but lack of incarceration too [See linked piece below].. This guy had not only been rewarded for evading arrest once, but had also violated the terms of his bail without consequence. Not only does our current soft-on-crime trend increase the danger to law enforcers, it sets the perps up to fail through its inconsistent and/or contradictory responses. When judges are just going to let violent criminals run free, why then should we continue to fund police departments? (Because innocent citizens will suffer? Oh please, that’s SO eighteenth century. Pointless, undeserved sacrifice is enlightened woke justice, don’tcha know.)

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-why-daunte-wrights-aggravated-robbery-charge-matters-so-much

I’m not sure this will get to the discovery phase, but I’d love to know what this 26-year veteran’s training schedule has been like. Has she been to the police training range any time in the last few years? Has she drilled on “shoot/don’t shoot” situations?
Have her training hours been filled with social justice and critical race theory seminars?
I’m going to assume that at 26 years in, she’s probably not an affirmative action hire.

I’m going to assume the Mother, grandmother, or some other relative, failed to teach the departed about civility and to obey the orders of those in authority positions.

From what I’m reading about the dear departed, he was a habitual criminal, and was doing his best to avoid spending time in prison.
Well, now he won’t.

ALL considerations of guilt or innocence aside, on the part of both the cop and the victim, this is clearly an unmitigated racist outrage….
The protests that is…
Here is an excerpt from something I wrote on Quora July 8, 2020:
Admittedly, Minnesota does seem to have a problem with Police officers killing innocents….
Y’all remember the riots; outrage; and how the country went up in flames over the killing of Justine Diamond in Minneapolis in 2017?
Right?
No?
Justine Diamond called the police early in the morning over suspicious noises near her place.
As she approached the police car, the cop in the passenger seat pulled out his gun and, across his partner, through the driver’s side window, shot and killed her.
Doesn’t ring a bell, eh?
Well, the policeman’s name was Mohammad Noor. He was a black Somali immigrant.
Justine Diamond was a white Australian immigrant.
Noor was suspended WITH PAY for 7 months until he was finally charged with her death.
After 2 years, he was finally convicted…
So – what’s the difference between the killing of Justine Diamond and the killing of my fellow townsman, George Floyd?
Hmmm…
One of these things is not like the other…

Bill discusses being ‘adrenalized’. An episode of Bluee Bloods (could not find the particular one with a search) illustrates the concept nicely. In order to get the Mayor’s Inspectoir General (Bebe Neuwirth) to better understand an officer involved shooting, Tom Selleck/Frank Reagan has her go through the police training range firing as she goes. Her memory fo what she did is afftected by the tension of the moment.

I was held up at gunpoint about twenty three years ago. I gave good enough detail for the police artist to come up with a composite that, when shown to another employee caused her to faint with the realization that the robber had been there the day before, casing the place. To this day, I cannot recall if he had a Yankees cap or a Malcolm X cap. But I can tell you he had a Smith and Wesson five shot snub nosed .38 revolver, with one bullet (what would have been the last one fired) scored across the bullet (a poor man’s fragmentation bullet). The artist kind of laughed, telling me that EVERYONE remembers the gun.
And I made a conscious effort to remember the ball cap.
Tension most assuredly alters perception.

This is a training failure. The reason you train is so that under duress the training takes over and muscle memory carries you through adrenalization to the other side of the event. Which is what happened here, the problem is that some failure in the training allowed the officer to draw, present and discharge the wrong weapon.

I can see how that can happen. You train people under stress, shouting at them, trying to piss them off, etc. You can’t do an actual mortal threat scenario but you try to come as close as you can when instructing people to use weapons in gravest extreme. Many times I’ve seen someone draw and train a sidearm on target but forget to release the safety. You can tell because you see them pointing the weapon while clutching it and nothing happens. I even got to the point where I would watch for trigger finger movement because if this happens it’s a habit that must be broken before it becomes ingrained.

This phenomena with the failure to release a safety is why Glock developed the trigger face safety, where the safety is actually a small lever embedded in the finger side of the trigger. It’s that much of a common problem that a handgun manufacturer designed a pistol to overcome it.

Of course that new system came with a whole new set of training problems. You have to train yourself to keep your FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER until you determine that you’re going to fire. Not that you’re ready to fire but that you have gotten to the point where you are certain you must discharge your weapon. Because otherwise there’s nothing between you and a shot being fired once you place a finger on the trigger.

Obviously you should keep your finger off the trigger until you’re ready to fire anyway and there’s a lot more to this — I’m not going to give a handgun class here on the forum. The point is that things happen very fast and with enough variation and uncertainty that training is crucial. Any of you who might CCW should be aware of this kind of thing and train yourselves, or get training, so that you don’t point that sidearm at a bad guy futilely pressing a trigger that’s locked by a safety, or accidentally shoot someone with your Glock. Don’t laugh, I’ve known multiple instances of people highly familiar with handguns and having years, even decades of experience — Who blew a hole in their bathroom floor taking a Glock handgun off to sit on the porcelain throne.

I agree with Bill, it would be very handy to have some sort of statistical analysis to see if this thing with grabbing a sidearm when the intention was to grab a Taser is actually an issue or if this instance was just a sad fluke. It might be beneficial to train to aim a Taser at a lesser potentially lethal part of the body, like an upper shoulder or groin, rather than the center-of-mass chest that contains the cardio-pulmonary system. I’m not nearly as familiar with Tasers as I am sidearms so this might not be effective, I don’t know.

What I do know, or am at least fairly confident I know, is that there was some fault in training somewhere along the line that allowed this officer’s brain to say “Taser” but her muscles to say “Firearm” and that has led to a tragedy. It’s either that or this officer is some sort of idiot and her record does not indicate that to be the case.

Cannot believe how many people are attacking the officer. While you all are having a good cry session over this event, why don’t you spend a little more time demanding that society start raising their offspring to become productive members of society.
This Officer’s life is over all because the late Bible scholar failed to follow instructions.
Good grief!

I didn’t “attack the officer”. I said this was a training failure and unless there’s some new magical system whereby police officers train themselves that means it’s not wholly her doing. I even went to great lengths explaining why training is a serious factor in this kind of situation. Maybe you should try reading things objectively instead of just mistakenly thinking I was “attacking an officer”.

The implication from what I said is that this incident needs to be studied, carefully and objectively to figure out what went wrong, and then the training regimen needs to be adapted and adjusted accordingly.

I agree that the dipstick didn’t follow instructions and got himself killed.

At the end of the day though, this police officer grabbed the wrong weapon and used it. A human being is dead because of that. He’s also dead because he was a criminal and would never have been in this situation if he were a “productive member of society”. All of that’s impossible to deny.

If that was my kid, and it would not be because I raised my kids right and one of them is now XO of a military base, I would still be pretty upset that he was killed because someone grabbed a Glock thinking it was a Taser.

The idea that this could be prevented with “better parenting” is just silly. There will always be bad apples, that’s WHY we need people like this officer and we will always need people like this officer.

Good grief my ass.

Another aspect that is being discussed is the shape of the Taser itself.
When Tasers were first developed, they were shaped more like a DustBuster than a gun. They were this big brick-like thing.
The second-gen Taser resembled nothing so much as a Star Trek TNG phaser. Then they morphed into the current shape, like a low bore-axis pistol.
The literature says that the device is “unlikely to be confused with a service weapon due to its; differing weight, balance and the bright color of the weapon”, but in reality, when the officer is focused on the perps hands and eyes, there is a good chance that they won’t notice these things in the heat of the moment.
However, a tactile difference in shape or grip type would be more likely to penetrate the awareness of the officer in a “stress haze” and inform them of the error in weapon selection.
IMO, the second-gen Taser (the phaser shape) might have been the best ergonomic choice.
I can’t recall where I saw the discussion, but the opinion of a former officer that, in the stress of the moment, muscle memory over-rode the officer’s intent and sent her hand to the accustomed side-holster instead of the cross-draw taser holster. Between that and tunnel vision, she didn’t even notice the mistake until she heard the ‘bang’.

Consider this: In Indiana (I don’t know about the requirements in Minnesota) the LEA firearms qualification course is 50 rounds semi-annually – WITH EACH HANDGUN THE OFFICER CARRIES. I don’t know how many times annually an officer trains to present and fire the taser, but I’m willing to guess it isn’t 50 times – or even twice. Think about what that means for “muscle memory.”

All good points and all well worth consideration in any efforts to avoid this kind of thing happening in the future.

Yes and many people have no business brining children into the world. Following Law Enforcement instructions is not difficult.

That white-case/black-case thing is one big reason why men can’t find things in a refrigerator, I think. We look for shapes and colors, not details. Probably an evolutionary reason for this.

“What kinda problem is it really”? Come on, Bill. We don’t do risk assessment in this country anymore. JnJ’s vax was just pulled because of a literal One in a Million chance there will be serious blood clotting issues.

Oh that’s nothing, Bill. Once I was working and got up to take a break. This was decades ago cause I was using a pencil. I sit back down to work again. Can’t find the pencil. Look for a good 5-10min. Finally found the pencil.
In my hand.

Been there. Done that. Still do it with increasing frequency it seems, but I can’t remember. Even the Bill Cosby solution no longer works: sitting down to bounce the thought back to my head from the nethers it’s fallen.

Leave a Reply