From Matt Margolis at PJ Media:
“A judge in Michigan has vindicated President Trump by ruling that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, broke state law when she unilaterally changed election rules concerning absentee balloting in the 2020 election. This ruling legitimizes a key claim made by the Trump legal team in its challenges to the 2020 election…Michigan was not the only state where Democrat state officials unilaterally changed election laws, so this ruling certainly raises legitimate doubts whether Biden truly won the election without invalid votes.”
From Mollie Hemmingway at The Federalist:
“…Unlike so much of the Trump campaign’s legal efforts, outside observers agreed that this lawsuit was serious:
“The 64-page complaint is a linear, cogently presented description of numerous election-law violations, apparently based on hard data. If true, the allegations would potentially disqualify nearly 150,000 illegal votes in a state that Biden won by only 12,000…
“But as legitimate as the lawsuit was, it entered a Kafka-esque world where it couldn’t get heard.”
From Jay Valentine at American Thinker:
“Our team members were the lead builders of one of the world’s most sophisticated criminal profiling systems in use by law enforcement today…The profilers have zero interest in U.S. elections. Two of them did not vote and had unflattering opinions about both presidential candidates…To them, 2020 election fraud was an industrial level crime. It was of such magnitude that it moved from the category of an election crime to a sovereign crime…Sovereign crime means your government was a participant, active or passive, enabling vote fraud…Our profilers comfortably said the 2020 election fraud was on such a scale that it was impossible for the major law enforcement agencies to not have known about it in advance…Governmental law enforcement either actively engaged in the fraud, which is impossible to prove, or knowingly acquiesced after the fact…The team, educated in some of the most sophisticated organized fraud tactics, posited that this was not a dry run. Their thesis is that if one were to seriously evaluate the balloting in many states for 2014, 2016 and 2018, one will find traces of what happened in 2020.”
Obviously, the party bosses know they can’t win unless they cheat, and the 2020 election proved them to be epic cheaters. But as they’ve now demonstrated that they have no qualms about killing tens of thousands of grandmas while also torturing over a million more with solitary confinement, being called cheaters by us lowly deplorables will make as much impact on them as a flyswatter versus an ICBM.
But what about your Cheater Party-voting family and friends? They may not be sociopaths hellbent on destroying our magnificent nation and everyone in it, but once they abetted those criminals who are, well then, it’s well past time to end our good-natured, kid-glove treatment and only and ever call them what they are.
Cheaters.
2 replies on “The Cheater Party Flunkies”
And yet probably nothing will be done. If government derives its powers from the consent of the governed, then it looks like we are consenting. I remember a line from A Man for All Seasons; “A maxim of the law is silence gives consent.”
Amen.