The Deep State Surfaces: ‘Polite’ Canadian Police Grab Her Phone, Force Her Out of ‘Red Zone’

A problem with sinking Bill’s “Deep State Submarine” is target identification.

Like anything that is meant to be concealed, the signal to noise ratio is significantly disadvantageous.

To use the submarine analogy, there’s a lot more water than there is submarine and that makes finding and correctly identifying the right submarines difficult.

The guy Bill made a point of pointing out in the video is a submarine Kaptain. Klaus Schwab runs the World Economic Forum (WEF) at a salary of one million Swiss Francs per year. He has two adult children; Nicole and Olivier. Nicole Schwab is the co-founder of the “Gender Equality Project” and Olivier Schwab is married to a Chinese woman and is the head of his father’s WEF branch in Beijing.

While Klaus Schwab operates his WEF openly and is a known figure internationally, there’s almost no media coverage of his activities, the activities of his children or of the WEF in general.

A sub-endeavor of Klaus Schwab’s WEF is an organization called the “Global Shapers Community”. This is a global network of “hubs” of young people aged 20 to 30 who are called “shapers”. These shapers are recruited for their exceptional ability to influence their communities. As of September, 2021 there existed 444 hubs comprising 10,000 “shapers”. That’s a sizable political force backed by very significant amounts of money. These sorts of organizations are prone to exert influence far beyond the proportion of their own numbers.

The observable activities of Klaus Schwab’s WEF indicate that he’s engaged in a project to supplant national governments with a global network of self-selected coalition of multinational power brokers including corporate and governmental components (which also happens to include the United Nations which receives significant funding from the WEF). Klaus Schwab argues that governments are no longer “the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage” and that “the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance”.

Clearly the intent of Klaus Schwab and his organization(s) is to replace the recognized, legitimate democratic models of governance with self-selected group(s) of “stakeholders” to make decisions on behalf of the population, the “vox populi” being supplanted with a global hegemony of quiet leadership of elitist individuals.

This is a true threat to democracy on the geo-political stage.

Klaus Schwab is not Jewish. I’ll get into why this is an important distinction in a bit.

Contrast Klaus Schwab with George Soros, the well known Leftist financier. The two intersect in interests and each supports the other but Soros is a separate entity working towards the same goals from a different angle. Enough is known about George Soros and his activities that there’s no need to sketch them out.

They are birds of a feather from different nests.

Both are Kaptains of Bill’s “submarine” analogy.

George Soros is Jewish. Of the two it is likely that Klaus Schwab is the more powerful and the lesser known.

Why is being Jewish, or not, significant?

Because a lot of “conspiracy theories” lay the blame for these global efforts at subverting and supplanting self rule by The People — Are laid at the feet of Jews. While there may be Jews involved, this impetus towards global domination is not a Jewish thing at all. There are other than Jews involved and in fact some of the most powerful, influential actors are not Jewish.

In Soros case, he’s Jewish but not even an observant Jew. He does not practice his hereditary religion. Blaming his Jewish heritage on the evil he does is exactly like saying that America being a largely Christian nation all mistakes and wrongs ever done by America are the fault of Christianity.

(Don’t fool yourself, America has made mistakes and done evil. The Episcopalian Christian Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a Democrat, signed off on and approved the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII while ignoring any and all German Americans. This was pure racism of the sort that Adolf Hitler would have approved. The important distinction is that America learns from her mistakes and having made them tends not to make them again. America is a self-correcting system.)

Why is this important? Because of that target identification problem I brought up earlier.

When you see someone blaming “the Jews” for a global conspiracy that’s a serious “ping” in target identification of the submarines Bill’s analogizing. That’s not the real target, the real target is evil men bent on the acquisition of power towards global domination. There are evil men of all creeds, faiths, heritages and races. Evil is evil no matter who is committing it and the Jewish people do not have a monopoly on Evil.

Correlation does not imply causation.

This is a vital aspect of target identification. If the target is not correctly identified, the wrong submarine, or a decoy will draw fire. This works in the favor of Evil not against it. Evil does not care if you destroy friendly targets or the wrong target. In fact, Evil being evil encourages that sort of thing. It eliminates the good and right as a collateral damage of efforts to combat Evil.

It’s important to know your target because it is lazy, cheap, cowardly, slovenly, counterproductive, shallow, self-defeating and aids Evil when you make a mistake in what is and what is not a legitimate target.

This is where my military training and background distinguishes me from others without military service and I’m trying to help everyone gain that sort of perspective even though they have not lived that sort of situation.

In a combat theater, the worst thing you can do is take out your own people just because they might happen to be in a place you don’t expect them to be, or look like an enemy formation, or make any other “friendly fire” mistake.

It’s not only that it’s horrible that you killed your own guys, that there are American mothers who will not see their sons (or daughters) because you fired on them mistakenly. That’s horrible enough but it also aids your enemy by causing confusion and inflicts casualties to effectives that would have been used against that enemy.

So when you pull a trigger, or give a “FIRE!” order, or use any sort of force against a target it is more than essential you are certain of the nature of that target.

I recently posted a long screed about that sort of thing in response to a blog post by another member. As is the habit of that member the response brought all sorts of OTHER situations and circumstances into the defense of that erroneous position. That is known as a “straw man” argument because it does not address what I was saying, it merely tries to justify an error with irrelevancies to the topic I’m addressing. It is bringing other things into the discussion than what I myself actually said in order to attempt to destroy my argument by accusing me of something I neither said nor did. That is creating a “straw man” so that it can be burned down rather than engaging the real conversation honestly.

I often see this same brand of hogwash when I make any sort of constructive criticism of Donald Trump. I think Trump was the greatest President since Ronald Reagan but I don’t think he’s a perfect human being, I don’t think he didn’t make any crucial mistakes because he did, and I don’t think he’s the only man who could have accomplished the things for this nation that he did. It’s my opinion that some of the errors he made contributed to OUR loss of control and indirectly to the situation we now face. If Trump had not made those mistakes he would have served the nation even better than he did and likely would still be doing so.

Then to make matters worse rather than discuss such errors people almost always bring up all the bullshit talking points of the Left that were used against Donald Trump and accuse ME of saying the same things. Which I am not doing at all. That’s also a straw man argument.

It is prideful and self-defeating to do that sort of thing.

Another aspect of military training is “mission oriented behavior”. It doesn’t matter how something makes me feel, or what I think (if it’s mistaken or does not encompass the whole picture and all the necessary information) or if I want to justify something or anything else because … Everything is secondary to the mission.

Our “mission” is the preservation and restoration of our Republic. Personalities are not a priority. I don’t care if someone is mistaken, misinformed or just acting out of a misplaced sense of pride. That has nothing to do with that mission. The mission is everything and anything that hinders the mission is a serious error. Collateral damage is harmful to the success of the mission and there are too many Conservatives who are willing to do that sort of damage, or unwittingly do so for some reason that does not make sense to me.

So when I see something like that, I write one of these long comments because almost any idea worth exploring cannot be covered properly in the format of a 256 character Tweet or a simple paragraph or two.

Target identification is one of those ideas worth expounding upon at such lengths.

So … Jews are not the enemies of mankind bent on global domination. That’s anti-semitism and a form of racism that is still semi-permissible in some circles. It’s wholly counterproductive to the mission.

The mission is to identify and destroy the subtle, powerful, un-obvious true enemies of our Republic and that includes those who would supplant the self-rule concepts of Democracy with their own permanent lock on political power. In order to engage that enemy effectively you must identify and understand him. This is not as easy as some might think, it’s not simple and obvious and it cannot be distilled to a one-size-fits-all ideology.

Hubris is counterproductive to that mission. The problem with hubris is that it’s not obvious to its victims. It’s a little like being drunk and thinking you’re still OK to drive a vehicle. You’re not, it’s obvious to others you’re not, but it’s nearly impossible to get you to give up the car keys until you sober up.

Watch for that sort of thing. It’s important that we critically understand and apply correct target identification. It’s not an attack on your ego or your heroes to point out mistakes with constructive criticism. Your ego is your own problem and if it’s getting in the way, you’re part of the problem not part of the solution.