Categories
MB2A

The Hottest Infectious Disease Expert Alive: But Sen. Rand Paul Fails to Swoon at Fauci’s Feet

Bill Whittle digs through Dr. Anthony Fauci’s resume to unearth why Sen. Rand Paul is not composing rapturous poetry to him.

The Hottest Infectious Disease Expert Alive: But Sen. Rand Paul Fails to Swoon at Fauci's Feet

While the Left falls all over itself to laud Dr. Anthony Fauci as the hottest infectious disease expert alive, Sen. Rand Paul fails to swoon. Bill Whittle digs through some of Fauci’s resume to see why.

Moving Back to America is a production of our Members. Join us now.

Video below hosted at Rumble. 

36 replies on “The Hottest Infectious Disease Expert Alive: But Sen. Rand Paul Fails to Swoon at Fauci’s Feet”

reading the GainOfFunction moratorium directive you find the closing contains a blessing of sorts for GOF … if the “funding agency” certifies its criticality to “public health” or to national security….. so you see that support/funding never ever REALLY stopped…. and I would venture to guess the obama NSC team (includes the then veep biden) would have been briefed and secured a “nod” from mr obama as this “project” had the potential for impacting/causing a world-wide catastrophe ….. and I’m seeing that “team obama” lifted said moratorium just days before the U-Haul trailer carted his krap outa 1600 Pennsylvania… so the good doc has reason and incentives to be the public face of the deceit and perfidy of team obama in the catastrophe they unleashed…. with the help of the “sloppy” CHICOM genocidal world domination seeking regime’s WUHAN biowarfare complex… plausible deniability

18.30 of deadly truth that the entire world should take the time to watch. unfortunately just a few hundred of us will. hopefully we all send it to others (i just sent it to eleven) and that snowballs….like a virus or something.

I’d edit my comment if I could figure out how to, but the end of the song is: Gee Officer Krupke, Krup you!

“Two recent studies co-funded by the National Institutes of Health have shed light on how this potentially grave human health threat could become a reality. Working carefully with influenza viruses they have engineered in isolated biocontainment laboratories, scientists in Europe and the United States have identified several mechanisms by which the virus might evolve to transmit efficiently in the ferret, the best animal model for human influenza infection. This research has allowed identification of genetic pathways by which such a virus could better adapt to transmission among people. This laboratory virus does not exist in nature…important information and insights can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory…The ferret transmission studies were intended in part to fill these important gaps in knowledge…Safeguarding against the potential accidental release or deliberate misuse of laboratory pathogens is imperative. The engineered viruses developed in the ferret experiments are maintained in high-security laboratories. The scientists, journal editors and funding agencies involved are working together to ensure that access to specific information that could be used to create dangerous pathogens is limited to those with an established and legitimate need to know.”
“A Flu Virus Risk Worth Taking,” Washington Post OpEd, By Anthony S. Fauci, Gary J. Nabel and Francis S. Collins December 30, 2011
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-flu-virus-risk-worth-taking/2011/12/30/gIQAM9sNRP_story.html

Bill! I don’t appreciate being subjected to that stomach churning fawning dreck and drivel over a man who should be up on charges for the carnage he’s been part of raining down on the world. Have a heart and don’t ever do that again!!!

Charges? Let’s not forget that fauxi is Trump’s creation. he should have sacked the SOB back in April’2020 the latest. And asked all the questions about the lab, the funding and everything else.
Instead he decided it’s better PR to keep him around and let grow to all the power he has on the nation.
That’s what you get when your leaders want to pose instead of leading. 🙁
Also, as we see 500 days after the 2 weeks to flatten the curve the population still bends th eknee and is ready to take on the next wave of lockdowns, disregarding the data, the sense and everything.
Guess we just get what we deserve. The spirit died long time ago, eventually the body follows.

Trump should have booted Fraudci and Scarfyface the first time Fraudci contradicted himself. Trump’s worst mistakes were choosing people who then betrayed him at every turn. I cringed hearing him give both of them over-the-top kudos for the excellent job they were doing – stupid sucking up that got him nothing except more backstabbing.
Just goes to show that American politics is way nastier than the New York contracting and building business. If a man with Trump’s creds couldn’t drain the swamp, I don’t think it can be done.

Draining the swamp cannot be done by one person, especially one lacking any knowledge of the DC gene pool. There’s only one way it could be done – defaulting on every single federal payroll check. Though there are some true believers who value sticking it to us more than their salary who might stay at their post, with no hope of profit, most swamp creatures will swiftly sink back into the muck from which they slithered.

Agreed! That’s a delightful thought, but it isn’t going to happen. If half the country stopped paying all federal taxes, that’d get their attention, too, but not happening. While we’re fantasizing it would be super satisfying to March on Washington en masse, and proceed to escort every single federal employee including President* and the entire Congress out the door into waiting paddy wagons, take them to Gitmo and hold them oh….at some point for trial. And of course release our political prisoners being held in solitary for the entirely legal entry to the capitol building on Jan. 6th.

True. We don’t have the sense to stop feeding the beast preying upon us, but when the Chinese and the rest of our suckers lenders decide they will enjoy a better return by igniting paper dollars instead of throwing away their wealth on the purchase of US Treasuries, it will.

Looked at the US Debt to GDP ratio lately? No question our creditors have. “Full Faith and Credit of the United States of America.” Yeah, those were the days. There’s not one word in that motto that any of our “betters” from either side of the aisle even believes, let alone lives by. They’re just blithely playing the odds that they’ll be retired and safely ensconced in their comfy recliners when the music playing in their game of US fiscal musical chairs eventually stops. No truer believers in globalism than the bad actors doing their damndest to destroy the last, best alternative to it.

When you owe your banker a hundred thousand dollars you can’t pay, you have a problem. When you owe your banker 30 trillion dollars you can’t pay, your banker has a problem.

What gives anyone good reason to believe there are going to be Social Security and Medicare checks to send out after our creditors cut us off? One sure thing about immoral people who don’t honor their obligations is that they don’t honor their obligations. We’ve filled DC with them. You’re 100% right that we should go after them, the question is how. The federal legislative and judicial branches have proven themselves to be worse than useless means of redress. If China and George Soros don’t crash the US Dollar first, it seems to me our only hope is at the state level. The federal courts can keep issuing all the nullifying decrees they want – what means have they to enforce them? The executive branch has successfully kept the states to heel by threatening the loss of federal funding. To our eternal shame, we the people don’t have the character to urge our governors to tell the feds to keep their phony money and shove their unconstitutional edicts right up their Wuhan. Contrary to our ruling class’ propaganda, upholding the Constitution at the state level is the opposite of nullification.

Au contraire, Trump maybe didn’t fire the fraud, but he’s been in government since like the Johnson administration.

Nope, Who is correct. There is no preposition before Who.to necessitate placing the object of the preposition somewhere. The sentence cannot even be rearranged to insert an implied preposition to use whom.

Actually, “whom” is correct. It’s the direct object of the word “trust”.
Try a different sentence with a pronoun that shows subject and object cases:
“Whom do I trust more?”
“I” is the subject — you’d never accept “Whom do me trust more?” or even “Who do me trust more?”
That leaves the direct object spot for the interrogative pronoun.
In fact, grammarly.com offers this:

Whom should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition. When in doubt, try this simple trick: If you can replace the word with “he”’ or “’she,” use who. If you can replace it with “him” or “her,” use whom.

Even with explanation you are incorrect. Her do I trust? You need to look up the pronoun objects of prepositions. Who is not there. Whom is. With no preposition, there is no whom.

Take it out of the inverted form used in the question.
“I trust her” — NOT “I trust she.” If you can’t tell which of these is correct, I give up on you.
You don’t need a preposition to put something into the objective case.

“I trust her.” is correct. However it should be “I have trust in her.” That implied preposition is right there. It is American short hand and colloquial to eliminate some verbs and prepositions. Most Americans uses it. I prefer to use the King’s English when writing or speaking. You can do what you want. By the way, preposition is pronounce ‘pre-position.” All prepositions are tasked with putting something somewhere. At, in, for, to, between, etc…. And they have their own special pronouns. It is sometimes called the ‘M’ rule. Me, you, him and her (although her is also possessive) us, them, whom. Each of these are correctly used with a preposition. SATs ACTs etc… all use these differences in tests. Could mean the difference between pass and fail. Interesting debate. Hope you have a nice day.

No, there’s no justification for rephrasing it as “I have trust in her”. “Trust” is a transitive verb and takes a direct object. There is no preposition, implied or otherwise. (It would be clearer in Latin where you can tell whether a pronoun is in the accusative or dative case by inspection.)

Nevertheless, if I buy your account, then you have just argued that your initial position, “Nope, Who is correct. There is no preposition before Who.to necessitate placing the object of the preposition somewhere” is wrong. Your invention of the implied preposition proves that “Whom” is correct.

Just had to screenshot and crop that when I saw it! May you and your posse laugh as much as I did!!!

well, it was the original taste that I loved so…

(and I cannot remember the rest of the lyrics to the commercial)

Leave a Reply