Categories
The Virtue Signal

The Reckoning: Reality Bearing Down on Progressive America with Unrelenting Fury

You can ignore reality, but it won’t ignore you.

You can ignore reality, but it won’t ignore you. And Bill Whittle sees increasing signs that reality is bearing down on Progressive America with unrelenting fury. Join Bill and Zo Rachel to explore the impact.

The Virtue Signal comes to you twice weekly thanks to our Members. You can join us and meet them in our oasis of reality.

Video below hosted at Rumble

Listen to the Audio Version

19 replies on “The Reckoning: Reality Bearing Down on Progressive America with Unrelenting Fury”

same thing can be said about cops getting even or to keep the bullying going. You may not like it but it is true. Cops are the Stockholm syndrome, we have been told for so long they are good, prove it

Well, it’s happening again, today, in LA. as the encampments get larger and more numerous. Coming with a resurgence of cholera and even black plague!
I kid you not, multiple reports of plague in the LA homeless ‘community’.

… And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

Nice. I don’t see a lot of people who know their Kipling. It’s good to run across such now and then. Wanna bet CRT doesn’t teach Rudyard Kipling or if it does it portrays him as a conquering white colonial villain?

Kipling, along with CS Lewis, is one of the sharpest observers of human nature to have been.

I think a lot of the ‘popular crowd’ feel like they haven’t really earned what they’ve achieved so they are absolutely sure no one else has either. And they really, really resent the people who obviously HAVE earned things through native talent and hard work, and are actually making real contributions to the world at large.

I came across this passage by D.A. Carson earlier this week that could as easily be applied secularly to Americans and our founding principles as it does to his intended Christian audience through its Biblical ones: “…many believers who have the courage to withstand direct assault do not have the sense to withstand deception. That is why in Revelation 13 the dragon has two beasts — one whose opposition is overt and cruel, and the other who is identified as the false prophet. That is also why in Acts 20 Paul warns the Ephesian elders not only of rapacious wolves that will try to ravage the flock of God, but also of the fact that from among their own number men will arise who will ‘distort the truth.’ Such people never announce what they are doing: ‘We are now going to distort the truth!’ The danger they represent lies in the fact that they are ‘safe,’ and then from this secure vantage they advocate ‘progressive’ positions that distort the Gospel . . . In our day, deception becomes all the easier to arrange because so many Christians are no longer greatly shaped by Scripture. It is difficult to unmask subtle error when it aligns with the culture, deploys spiritual God-talk, piously cites a passage or two, and ‘works.'” Substitute Americans for Christians and the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers for the Gospel and Scripture, and here we are. [Excerpt, For the Love of God, Volume One, D. A. Carson, 1998.]

Bill … I don’t know about your conclusions regarding the reliable stability of farmers. I grew up in Minnesota, a very decidedly Democrat State. The official name of the Democrat Party in Minnesota is the “DFL”, which stands for “Democrat-Farmer-Labor”. While the majority of the population in Minnesota is urban, like many other States, the vast majority of privately owned land is held by farmers.

Farmers are not so much “grounded in reality” as they are motivated by self interest. I had a conversation with a farmer during Jimmy Carter’s grain embargo of the Soviet Union during the Soviet-Afghan war. He was mad about the embargo because he felt it would drive down grain prices and didn’t give a whistle for what was good for the free world. A single anecdote isn’t proof but it’s a good example of the attitude held by farmers.

I’ve known a lot of farmers who will vote for whoever promises them greater prosperity regardless of reality or greater good. They will flop from Democrat to Republican like a boated fish trying to get back in the water. Others are hereditary Democrats and are just not going to vote Republican no matter what. Still others will vote Democrat because they mistakenly perceive it as an expression of how “nice” they are. Some will vote Democrat simply because they’re supporting the “home team” like matters of national and global importance were on a par with the local football team vs. the next town over.

Here’s the funny thing about what you said. City people usually don’t have much of a handle on what country people are really like and vice verse. I’ve lived in both. I grew up on a farm where everyone was a Democrat and everyone I knew was a Democrat — Who bemoaned Hubert Humphrey’s failed bid for the Presidency and thought Ronald Reagan was a senile old goat being manipulated by his handlers — And I’ve lived in Paris, London, Tel Aviv, Brisbane, Rome, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, Miami and Indianapolis and now I live in a rural area again because I like rural better and because I can — So I’ve seen both sides of the urban vs. rural situation up close and personal in extended experience.

I’m sorry but your generalizations do not reflect reality. There are at least the same proportion of boneheads sitting in tractors as there are sitting in cubicles. The boneheads in tractors will vote for Democrats if they think Democrats will deliver higher commodity prices and don’t care one bit about anything else. Usually they’re not even aware of or do not give credence to “anything else.” The boneheads in cubicles will vote for Democrats because “It’s what good people do. Look at what a wonderful person I am because I care.”. Different reasons, same results.

Leave a Reply