The movie ‘Crimson Tide’ illustrates the mastery of story that Progressives have used to transform our country — even when the audience doesn’t know what it all means — it can still have the ring of truth. Bill Whittle demonstrates how conservatives to can ensure their ideas about voting rights, voter ID and election integrity are not just true, but have the ring of truth.
Bill Whittle’s Moving Back to America series is made possible by our Members. Join us at https://BillWhittle.com
Video below hosted at Rumble.
12 replies on “THE RING OF TRUTH”
I want to find out if half my neighbors have no qualms about winning through cheating. Denying they won by fraud means they are willing to at least give lip service to honesty as well as that they still believe it shameful to admit their dishonesty. Once subjective morality, ends-justify-any-means necessary expediency is adopted by a large enough plurality of the citizenry, unless the honest purge or isolate themselves from that cancer, the only functional political system left us is totalitarianism
I actually disagree with Bill a bit here. If the election, hypothetically weren’t fraudulent, that would be the WORSE CASE SCENARIO. that means by an overwhelming margin, Americans voted for more abortion, more evil, persecution of the church, removal of ALL of our liberties, and the systematic indoctrination of our children. If that’s the case, there is no hope at all. We will be destroyed one way or another. If Biden won without fraud, America will be destroyed and deserves to be destroyed.
https://youtu.be/K3RUfFhCiQI
Some thoughts on why logical, direct, and cooperative talks don’t and can’t succeed with these crazy democrat leaders. They know they cheated and they got away with it. Why would they tell on themselves? Also, they plan on doing it again and again and again…….
Consider how close and hard they are pushing this country to an actual open warfare revolt!
Their supporters are even less open to talk. They have been told by their leaders that everything anyone says that contradicts them are lies and propaganda from black hearted, evil, predatory, child murdering, future destroying, demons from hell.
I believe that the radical left supporters would need to be treated like addicts in order to “combat” their level indoctrination. i.e. Rehab, 12 step etc.
I have asked some “Trump” haters to actually show me why they hate him so much. Not fluff, not accusations, just some even slightly verifiable accusations of wrongdoings, that he got away with, like the Clintons or Biden. I get nothing but false headlines, misquotes, blatant falsehoods, and pot shots of rock salt. I really would like to know what makes them hate him so much? I understand why the elites hate him, he upsets their control plans. Why do the serfs believe he is Satan incarnate?
I heard a sermon once where the rabbi talked about his little war with the bank. He was sure they made a mistake with his account and he spend most of his weekend digging through checks and receipts to prove it (back when you balanced a checkbook with a pen; kids ask your grandparents). Finally in the end he proved it, that is, he proved the bank was right. The moral of the story was that you want the bank to be right. You want to be able to trust the bank.
I am in exactly the same place as Bill. If forensic audits show that there really wasn’t significant fraud (there’s always a little and there are always small mistakes) then this is a Good Thing™. It means we can win and it seems likely the way things are going that we will win if the game isn’t rigged. Elections are very important things; trust but verify.
There’s an old saying that roughly paraphrased goes –
“If you aren’t a leftist at 20 years of age, you have no heart. If you’re still a leftist at 40, you have no brain.”
This is an observable fact. It’s clear that leftists rely more on emotional appeal than logical analysis. The problem is not only that young people tend to gravitate towards what they perceive as a more egalitarian and revolutionary approach to governance, it’s that so many of them never grow out of that phase.
What Bill is suggesting above is something I’ve done for a long time. It’s a successful tactic because it appeals to an immature and emotional viewpoint. I.E. “Let’s go ahead and prove you’re right so we can put the controversy to bed” or “If you’re so certain of your position there’s nothing for you to be afraid of”. Those are both emotional rather than logical appeals. That’s what works on those who by 40 years of age have not forsaken their leftist ideological idiocy.
Part of the reason that this tactic is not applied more broadly to greater effect is that by the time people are 50 opinionated ossification has started to set in and by the time they’re 60 their attitudes about so many things has become so rigid that they simply cannot hear any other valid opinion.
I see this all the time, on this very website. This manifests as open hostility to anything that someone has decided they have good reasons to disapprove of, and that means not only the conduct but the person. Just very recently I saw someone post that “if you do xyz you’re an imbecile, have no concept of reality and no grasp of mathematics”. Which is ridiculous.
I don’t want to name any names, I’m not looking to tear anyone down here and Lord knows I make enough enemies unintentionally without doing it on purpose but — the very idea was preposterous. Just because someone does a thing that you do not do and do not approve of does not make them a lesser being than you. It certainly does not make you their superior. It does not confer on you a firmer grasp on reality or cosmically superior mathematical skills.
Let’s say for the sake of argument that we’re talking about … oh … smoking cigars, drinking fine whiskey (or whisky and yes there’s a difference) or moderate and well controlled recreational gambling.
I do not gamble with money myself as a rule. That’s not because I disapprove of gambling, you can gamble all you like for all I care. I don’t care if you gamble away every penny you have, that’s for you and your family to deal with unless you’re stealing or committing some crime to support your gambling. It’s none of my business if you gamble within the law.
If you gamble within your means for recreation I can see where someone might get more enjoyment out of taking the money they might have used for some other recreational pursuit and going to a casino as their choice in recreation.
I do not think that person is an imbecile for doing that, I don’t believe they have no grasp of reality and I do not think that the mathematics module in their brain is deficient. I wouldn’t do that because …
The reason I don’t gamble is that I have discovered over the years that I have about the world’s worst luck at gambling. I lose a lot more than I win and throwing money away in that particular fashion does not constitute “fun” for me.
There are things involving chance and skill that I’m really good at. I very rarely go hunting or fishing that I don’t come home with my quarry. Many of my family and friends have remarked on the fact that we can be side by side in boats on the water, using the same tackle and lures in the same manner, and if anyone is going to hook a fish it’s going to be me. Same goes for hunting, I cannot remember the last time I got skunked deer hunting, it’s been decades. There is absolutely some skill involved but there’s an undeniable element of chance too.
I enjoy that kind of thing because I’m successful at it and it amuses me. Plus I like fresh fish or fresh game but that’s a bonus. If I never caught or bagged anything I’d still spend my money on that rather than gambling because I enjoy a day in the woods or on the water more than I enjoy sitting in a casino somewhere.
Conversely I have known professional, successful gamblers that would think sitting in a boat or on a deer stand was wasting time and money they could be applying more fruitfully gambling. That’s fine with me, I don’t ask them to go fishing and they don’t expect me to sit at a table with a bunch of cards and chips on it.
When you consider the money I’ve spent on just those two hobbies, hunting and fishing, and not even taking into account things like cigars and whiskey (or whisky), none of that pays off in black ink. There was a time when I could have raised a cow and a couple hogs every year on what I spend on hunting. It would be a lot cheaper to go to the fish market than to own a boat. My Dad loved fishing and boating but he called a boat “a hole in the water you fill with money”. He was right about that …
If you want to be an ass you can say I’m throwing my money away on this stuff and that throwing my money away in this manner demonstrates that you’re a better person than me for not doing it yourself.
My point is that what I don’t do is think anyone who doesn’t see this sort of thing my way is less than me. I don’t think I’m better than them. I don’t use my personal position on such topics to denigrate anyone’s intelligence, perception of reality or arithmetical acumin. I sure as hell don’t go around virtue signalling what a wonderful person I am because someone else does something I don’t and would not do.
This sort of ossified opinion does not win any arguments, it does not convert any unbelievers and it does not sway any votes. It’s neither a matter of logical analysis nor emotional appeal. It’s just old people with sticks up their butts and that doesn’t make you look better than anyone. It makes you look like an old person with a stick up your butt. Make no mistake, you can be 30 years old and still look like an old person with a stick up your butt.
They are rhetorically talented enough to even convince themselves of things they don’t really believe.
“It isn’t so much that liberals are ignorant. It’s just that they know so many things that aren’t so.” -Ronald W. Reagan, 40th President of the United States of America
When there are trillions at stake, the Leftist side is not going to be reasonable even when WE are appealing to reason. “I should be telling this with a sigh somewhere ages and ages hence.” R. Frost. I sincerely believe that Bill is a supremely intelligent, civil and reasonable person. I wish there dwelled on the other side such men and such women.
The point here, though, is not to convince the dyed-in-the-wool leftist. It is to keep your average Joes who are easily fooled by them from being fooled by them.
Very simply, us Normals only use the language to defend, while The Radical Left uses it to constantly attack. Our side has to learn to adopt their tactics & force them to expend energy into defending their insanity rather than fling their insanity to try to destroy us
https://youtu.be/Ty5bXad0dZI
“Evil will triumph because good is dumb.”
Seriously, how many times you’re allowed to fall to the same stupid obvious trick before it’s more your fault than the tricksters’? Old days we had it at once.
Evil will triumph because we don’t kill them enough. And won’t when we do.
Ask the Japanese or the Germans.
I miss the art of the disproportional response. Or at least the properly valued proportional one.