From a email I received from Project Veritas:
Project Veritas released a new video today exposing Trump ballots being called for Biden during the ongoing Georgia recount process.
A Republican National Committee monitor in Georgia’s election recount, Hale Soucie, told our undercover journalist there are individuals counting ballots who have made continuous errors.
Soucie said that one auditor called out votes for Biden “three times in three minutes,” but a second auditor went on to correct the record saying: “No, this is Trump.”
Here are some of the highlights from today’s video:
- Hale Soucie, Republican National Committee monitor in Georgia: “I’ll give you the full story of what happened. So, three times in three minutes, she [auditor] called out Biden. The second auditor caught it and she said: ‘No, this is Trump.’”
- Soucie: “The next table I went to right after that — the only reason why I went to that table is because there was one where, the first person reading it off, handing it to her — she’s not even looking at it [ballot], she’s just putting it in.”
- Soucie: “So Table 17 was the first one where the woman got it wrong three times. Table 18 was where the first person called out Biden or Trump, she passed it across the table and the other person would not even look at it and put it wherever the first person said. That person is supposed to be auditing it, checking the second one.”
10 replies on “Trump ballots being called for Biden during the ongoing Georgia recount process”
The level of corruption in the democratic party is truly sickening. They must think that we’re as stupid as the people who vote for them.
Yep! And for 1/3 of the nation it works. Their motto: Never underestimate the stupidity of the general public.
That is why we must aim for the 1/3 of the people that are undecided.
People for the most part are relatively smart/ Crowds are stupid.
I am so grateful for these patriots! If you believe in God, please pray for them, because they are fighting the deep state and illegitimate tactics (e.g., that postal worker who was strong-armed/confused enough to “rescind” his affidavit).
There will be additional evidence that can’t be used in the lower courts, the Judge’s security clearance is not high enough, it will show up at the supreme court.
That’s not how our system works. You don’t get to present new evidence to an appeals court. So if that happens, it would be circumventing the Constitution to get the result we want. I would not support that.
I agree with you. But you realize that this is precisely why the left wins? Because they are willing to destroy the constitution for their ends. While we are always fighting with one arm tied behind our backs.
I agree that we must fight dirty. We must call them out, stop playing nice and “taking one for the team.” Especially we must not give in to this idea that Trump should withdraw “for the good of the country.” That’s manure. It is for the good of our republic that Trump should continue to fight.
As for the courts, if there are really issues requiring high security clearances for a judge to review, such a judge will be found or cleared. Someone called out of retirement, perhaps.
The evidence will be reviewed in camera, that is, within the judge’s chambers, not in open court. This is routine for sensitive evidence, for example privacy concerns.
The point is, there are procedures already in place to deal with security evidence. The lower courts will be able to accommodate it. It may never be acknowledged in open court or in court filings that it is there, but it will be there.
Presumably there will be simultaneous pursuit of the fraud in both the executive and the legislative branches.
Not in open court. That is the problem. Judgement in secret is “justice” in doubt. Doubt in our election system? Is this not how the communist party operates? This is the FISA mess. Secret courts with secret evidence and secret judgements.
While I am sensitive to security concerns (I have had a security clearance myself) I believe there is only one recourse. Declassify all sensitive materials ahead of time. If it is a case of fraud, it is a case of fraud. I have never heard of a case of fraud shielded due to a national security issue.
Then again, this is 2020.
I agree with you. I think it should all be declassified and argued in open court. I assume that the issue here is some kind of national security thing where the NSA and military intelligence have proof of the voting machine tampering that switched Trump votes to Biden and added in extra votes for Biden in those “glitches.” They will probably argue that certain aspects of that can’t be revealed publicly, because the CIA designed it to spy/interfere on other countries’ elections. I say, so what, screw that. Dump it ALL out in the sunlight. Whatever super-secret code they may have planted, it’s now obsolete by definition. They can reinvent it if they want to for next time.
Yep. And the trouble is that they WILL.