Visit our friends at
Will Democrat presidential candidates show restraint when they attack President Trump’s attack on Iran’s Qassem Soleimani, because American security and global reputation is more important than scoring political points? And how much crowing about military accomplishments will American voters tolerate from the incumbent?
Bill Whittle Now with Scott Ott is a production of our Members. Join them now.
How would you like to meet the hosts of your favorite shows, and (more importantly) your fellow fans, on a relaxing Caribbean cruise? Join us May 15-18. Find out more and book your cabin.
6 replies on “Aiding and Abetting: How Democrat Candidates Attack Trump’s Iran Attack”
You can’t ignore that the commander in chief is the gate keeper for how effective our military can be. When they shot down our drone, who refused to retaliate and take lives because of the loss of a machine? Trump. Who has to green light these operations? That’s right. Trump. Don’t remove him from the equation. We need him to ALLOW our forces to function as they should.
As an addendum to my previous post… I identify my self as a Libertarian Constitutional Conservative. I’ve just read a blog post on zerohedge.com … I don’t subscribe to his perspective however he has some very valuable insights into the political hysteria that prevails in our country and the world and the causes thereof… So here’s the link.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/era-big-tech-censorship-big-pharma-intoxication-big-government-surveillance-soleimanis
So as the situation unfolds in Iran/Iraq over the targeting of Sulimani et al (pro Iran assets in Africa) the conjecture and supposition is to say the least convoluted. In a situation like this, one has to take a step back and attempt to access the BIG picture… ignore the propaganda… concentrate on the actual events whether intended or incidental successful or not and do so in a larger geopolitical framework… but do so in an extended time frame… take your time… Those first out of the opinion gate are those who are either biased in favor or opposed or are chasing fame.
Having said all that… what I have gleaned having waited several days, is that there is a hell of a lot of shmitt going on…
To get to where I’m going….
A) Do you remember John Kerry making clandestine visits to Iran?
Violating the rule of law…. Do you know why?
B) Do you remember Obama delivering Pallets… billions of US$ to Iran.
C) Do you know that Obama approved the granting of thousands of
Iranians visa’s to America… the sale of enriched uranium….
D) Do you notice the slant to reporting of the Sulimani event on MSM?
E) Do you see a pattern?
F) Are you following the saga of the downed Ukrainian Airliner…
G) Is it possible and this is my conjecture (and that of others) is that
it was shot down by the Iranians (undisputed) not as an accident, but
in expectation that Trump would respond to the missile attack on the
US bases the previous day by launching a counter missile strike
against Iran and that the downed Ukrainian plane could be attributed
thusly… follow this one closely.
H) But the most important take away is the relationship of the Democrat
Party to those who chant ‘DEATH to AMERICA’ and what the end play is.
If Trump was the kinda guy who’d point at the scoreboard rather than spike the ball, Hillary would be President.
I don’t anticipate Donald Trump not giving credit to our military, because he always has.
Bill, as with Mark Hamill: “They are not heroes, they are just politicians.” Politicians pretended to be something they are not and got paid to do it. Then, when it comes time to be counted for something of real substance, they expose the empty reality under the facade.