On a particularly tense October day a small group of armed, white Americans gathered together in common cause. They were going to kill.
They were resolved to subjugate foreigners. They would take these culturally different people into custody or kill them outright. So, armed and ready, they walked toward their intended targets, guns in hand.
The foreign people saw them and desperately attempted to defend themselves against the armed horde. They did so to their own peril. One of the armed militants (we will call him Al) shot and killed twenty of these non-Americans without mercy. For years, those who support such violence hailed Al as an American Hero.
…And that is because he was.
Alvin C. York was a devout Christian and a soldier of the 82nd Infantry in the 1st World War. He was a Corporal at the time of the incident. This meant he had some leadership responsibilities over a squad of men. Being a man of character, Corporal York followed his commanding officer into battle that day, obeying orders and expecting his men to do the same. The orders were to take out an German machine gun emplacement.
The Germans feared that they would find death an unpleasant circumstance. For this and other reasons, they fired upon the American soldiers with the very machine gun that York’s detachment was sent out to silence. Nine of the 82nd fell that day. Death came flying toward them without mercy. Still, York lifted his M1917 “American Enfield” and took out twenty German soldiers in the battle. He did not drop, leap or seek cover. He fired back with a boldness that springs from a love of fellow soldiers and a singular will to save them from what must surely come in defeat. He would accept the surrender of the German commanding officer at the machine gun emplacement and lead 90 prisoners away. More German P.O.W.’s would be added on the way back to American lines.
The first story sounds pretty awful. It sounds as if violence was perpetrated for its own ends. The protagonists of the first are victims hounded by bloodthirsty Americans hefting guns for the joy of their murderous power. We might recognize the sound of that story, today.
The second tells a different story, altogether. It tells of an offensive strike for defensive purposes. It speaks of two powerful forces meeting in a battle. It tells of overwhelming fire power failing to conquer the will of men sent to secure a deadly situation.
The two stories are as opposite to one another as words will allow. The first is as devoid of context as one may ever witness…Unless you read anything the mainstream media publishes.
As we hear liberal media talking heads spew propaganda, perhaps we could think about just how much words are being used to assault the ever weakening truth in story lines. We could think about those pinned down by vicious, politically motivated media weapons. Maybe we could consider the media’s covering fire offered to radicals that are tearing our nation apart.
If we can, if it is still possible, we ought to gather, not unlike the men of the 82nd Infantry, more that one hundred years ago and face this situation with bravery, leadership, and a realization that words will be fired at us from the weapons of mass media malice. Despite the hail storm of hateful language aimed at us, could we simply take ground by getting in the streets, the stores, our churches, etc. and speaking the truth? Could we carry signs? Could we peacefully stand before the liars and live the truth? Maybe we should take the moral high ground without apologies to those who feel that certain language is excessive or somehow secretly racist.
Our couches are familiar with our presence. Our computer screens are well versed in our frustrated speeches to no one in particular. Our steering wheels and car radios have absorbed our derision for far too long. These are shots fired across No-Man’s Land. They are wasted rounds in a war of words that we are losing.
Where is the TEA Party? Where are the motivated Conservative Americans?
We are not marching into machine gun fire (yet). We would be walking down the streets of our country. We would be peacefully, logically communicating the truth. Is that really so frightening in the land of the free and the home of the brave?
Alvin York said that he didn’t really want to kill those German soldiers. He was a man that enjoyed peace. So are we. We do not have to bring escalation with us. We do not have to be what the socialists are but we do have to act soon. Without our voices, the world will only hear the sound of a nation dying in a torrent of media salvos.
2 replies on “Assault on Context”
There are several problems that we have as conservatives. One is the enemy we know. They control the media, most large companies, academia, the Democrat party, and the mass media. The other is the Republican party. The Republican party pays lip service to conservatives but quietly undermines every conservative “grass roots” initiative like the TEA Party. The Republican Party refuses to reform itself. If there is anything left of Trump’s successes still around when the next Republican is President, he will probably be first in line to dismantle it. I really think that a group of conservatives should break away from the Republican party and start the process to form a party that actually supports conservative values rather than just pandering to conservatives.
I agree, Allan, that we have a vocal and apparent enemy. Our enemy is engrained in news, entertainment, and culture…Because we support their movies, books, television shows, music, etc. We could take a massive slice of their funding away, immediately. This includes colleges and companies. We just don’t. We do not do it. It isn’t convenient…So we don’t do it.
The Republican Party is neither willing nor able to help Conservatives. It hasn’t helped Conservatives in a great many years, though. Bush Sr. supporters might recall the “voodoo economics” comment that voiced the feeling of quite a few republicans in the House and Senate since the late seventies. Bush Sr. would show some eerie economics himself by raising taxes after asking us to read his lips.
George W. Bush came on the scene and gave us the Patriot Act…Which is the cozy bed of a surveillance state. He then gave us TARP in October of 2008.
The TEA Party took to the streets during the Obama Administration and cried out against overreach and massive debt. We got more seats than we ever believed possible…And they squandered the opportunities given them.
Time and again, we have trusted the drunken husband of Republican nominees. Why should we trust them? What on earth makes us think that they will be anything like honest?
Trump stands alone in actually doing a great deal of what he said that he would do.Trump’s election was a statement of popular demand for something different. The difference was that he fought back. He spoke with the language of Americans that simply had put up with too much during the days of Obama’s hate filled rants against Christianity, capitalism, the Constitution, and our culture. That sentiment still exists but we cannot leave it to one man to express it. He is in the public eye. So should we be in the public eye. He is vocal. So ought we to be. He is authentic and unapologetic. That is exactly where we should be.
If you elect a man to only speak your grievances all you have is a mouthpiece, though. So, we ought to place public pressure on every politician to DO what they were elected to do. Speaking won’t be enough. Tweeting won’t answer the demand of the day. The coordinated effort to rebuild our freedom should, at a minimum, be as great as the cultural tide that swept America with a movie about superheroes and power stones. I hope that isn’t an overly ambitious dream for a people that inherited the greatest, freest nation in all of history.