A gathering near Mt. Sinai to stop climate change spurs some religious folks to push amendments to the 10 commandments. Will the COP27 addenda be drawn with the Apple Pencil of God on tablets of recycled glass? Will the high priests of Mother Terra revoke the injunction against idol worship? Is the entire climate conference a form of idle worship?
Alfonzo Rachel and Bill Whittle create two new episodes of The Virtue Signal each week thanks to our Members and donors. To become a Member, tap the big green button above. To donate, tap the big blue button above.
15 replies on “At the Summit of Mt. Sinai the High Priests of Climate Change Amend the 10 Commandments”
If the Satan worshipping sewer rat Leftists really believed the planet is dying, they would be THRILLED. Everything they stand for and believe in promotes death. Their own stated goal is to depopulate the planet to less than 1/10 of its current level. They promote child sacrifice, crime, euthanasia, the homosexual perversion, socialism, and jihad.
Excellent episode and I’m sorry I didn’t watch it before I sat down to discuss this with a German visitor to a Chanukah party my sister held… I would have sounded much less deranged…
I was just watching Jordan Peterson’s incredible Exodus series and this fit in so nicely… though we haven’t reached Mt Sinai yet…
This scamdemic has been going on for decades… morphing each time… as the earth changes… as it always does and will continue to do… long after we humans are gone… and a big part of the problem with the non scientific methods being used is the ability of governments and media to direct funding only to those who support their prevailing theory and thus actual science is pushed aside.. as we saw in the panic porn of the WuFlu…
so frustrating to watch idiot incompetent “elites” run governments these days…
It has absolutely nothing to do with climate, saving the earth, or survival of the human race!! It is all about power, control and greed of the elite and actually they are only elite in their own minds. They know they can not conquer us, especially in the USA, by conventional means. They must allow us to destroy us ourselves and they are doing a good job of it.
The earth warms, the earth cools, the sea levels rise, the glacier evaporate… So what? I think we can adapt. There is no “climate crisis.”
This interview with Dr. John Christy is well worth the listen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJv1IPNZQao
I still like to say to people when they tell me we will kill the planet – don’t you really mean the creatures on the planet? Don’t you really mean the people won’t survive? Isn’t that what you’ve been telling us since the 60s, that there are too many people?
Or if you really want to get a stern look from Karen – what temperature should it be?
Even in the last 4000 years, it has been a little warmer and little colder. What is the right temperature and do you think variations over 1000 years are unacceptable?
They really are trying to kill us. Anywhere between 50% and 90% of the world’s population is the goal.
They think they are Thanos from Marvel movies fame. The main thing wrong with Earth is it is overly infested with vermin called Homo Sapiens.
The leftist don’t even try to hide it anymore. They say 500 million people is the number. Well math must be hard for these guys,(because it is so racist).but since we have 8 billion people on the planet, give or take; 500 million means that 15 out of 16 people have to be removed. Any guesses who they want to start with?
Bill is correct about not caring about evidence of warming. Evidence of warming is irrelevant because of the converse error.
The structure of the argument begins with the statement, “If human activity causes global warming then the Earth will warm.” The converse is, “The Earth is warming, therefore human activity is causing global warming.” But, the converse is a logical fallacy.
For example: If aliens are projecting an energy beam on the Earth, the Earth will warm. The converse is, the Earth is warming, therefore aliens are projecting an energy beam on the Earth.
The point is: Evidence of warming is irrelevant to the cause and the converse will support any cause.
Good point. But simpler… As Bill said, its been both warmer and colder when people weren’t even around. Just because its warmer doesn’t mean people caused it. A study in 2020 showed it was about 3.6 degrees warmer than 2020 in the Roman warm period. I don’t think their chariots were petroleum powered. Or their factories. Or…..
I completely agree with you. The reason that I focused on warming is because the Left relentlesly searches for evidence of warming to fallaciously “prove” human caused global warming.
If it was real they would be looking at carbon capture rather than carbon restriction. After all, we would all be cold, starving, and miserable if they took away our energy. The poor would suffer most of all. Don’t they care about the poor?
I term it the “Disneyfication” of the environment. The adherents of this religion are so afraid and uncertain of their ability to handle change, they try to trap nature in a bottle. Like generations of parents before them, they want to return to Disney World with their children and ride “It’s a Small World” and watch the Main Street parade, confident that nothing has changed since they were kids. They are a children’s army of deluded King Canutes, standing arm-in-arm, trying vainly to hold back the tide of inevitable change.
I loved this episode, thank you! I am so on board with the suggestion of narrowing the focus to what can be shown in a reasonable timeframe. Obviously, the Al Gore and AOC types have miscalculated, so let’s give empirical science a go! And put little Greta back in her place so she’ll be unlikely to scold the adults (:
I find it interesting that the Biblical sign of the promise the world will not get flooded is the rainbow. And those colors are the sign of the LBTQ+people. And such wIckedness was why the flood occurred in the first place.
Well, evil cannot create. Just imitate or corrupt.