VP Pence while counting votes pulls a box from under a table, and goes through them…. a vote for Trump, a vote for Trump … as many times as are needed for Trump to win …. and when there are objections simply declare, “Granted ballots appeared from nowhere, we have more votes than electors, and the constitutional process was not followed … but none of those factors invalidate a result according to the democrat party or the media, so clearly you are only objecting because you are racist.”.
Trump wins.
Edited to add.
“And we look forward to when you appeal this to the supreme court, for the court to ignore the evidence that this count was illegitimate, and simply dismiss your appeal because … you lack standing… “
7 replies on “Counting electoral college votes …”
More realistic would be groups in the individual states declaring the actions of their state governments illegitimate, and overthrowing them.
But only marginally more realistic.
We need a better plan than holding our breath until we turn blue and stomping our feet, placing our fingers in our ears, and shrieking loudly.
There isn’t a “Revolution for Idiots” guidebook to follow. Because who would have thought we’d need to have to remind the law to follow the law?
I honestly don’t know what to do. But I do know I haven’t got enough ammunition to last more than a few days.
At least if he did this, it would highlight the concerns that those who only watch the msm would never have heard about.
Those who only watch the MSM are already lost. And therein lies the problem. We get the government we deserve.
I swear, when we open a new Constitutional Convention after the impending Civil War, we need to reinstate the property requirement to vote in some way. You need to have skin in the game, and not merely utilize your franchise to vote yourself a raise off the public teat.
my solution to the ‘voting yourself others wealth’, is to have the second chamber responsible for taxation, and have that body elected only by net tax payers, perhaps with a weighting – the more tax you pay, the more your vote counts.
A Senate made up of the Haves… Like the House of Lords?
I admit it. I like Federalism. In theory, it disperses power to the lowest practical level.
I am not advocating control by the haves, but a second house elected by those who fund the government and whose role is to control taxation and spending. The legislature would remain elected by everyone, as everyone is subject to their laws.
If membership in this house is dependent upon having property, what else do you call it? And I am fine with that, though I wouldn’t, as you suggest, give those who have more more of a voice than those who have less. My requirement is that you have to be paying in to be able to vote at all.