EPIC VIDEO: Dr. Dan Stock: “Everything Being Recommended by the CDC and State Board of Health Is Actually Contrary to All the Rules of Science”
Will YouTube take this down?????
Dr. Stock treats his Covid-19 patients by active loading with Vitamin D, with Ivermectin and Zinc. He also stated that by having a Vitamin D level greater than 55, you can lower your chances of dying by Covid-19.
12 replies on “Dr. Dan Stock: “Everything Being Recommended by the CDC and State Board of Health Is Actually Contrary to All the Rules of Science””
Tucker interviews viral doctor from Mt Vernon (rumble.com)
Just in case YouTube decides to take the above vid down, here’s the Rumble link——-
Medical Expert’s Methodical Deconstruction of CDC’s Botched COVID Response (rumble.com)
Epic, indeed. I thank Dr. Stock for his testimony and you Linda, for passing it along. The world desperately needs fewer break-through SARS-COV2 infections and more break-through truth injections.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/5/biden-teams-misguided-and-deadly-covid-19-vaccine-/
Whether having opted for the shot or not, here are recommendations for boosting our immune system from the Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance: Vitamin D3 1000-3000 IU per day; Vitamin C 500-1000 mg twice a day; Quercetin or mixed flavonoid supplements (green tea, berry extract) 250 mg/day; Zinc (oxide, gluconate, sulfate) 30 – 50 mg per day; Melatonin (slow release) 2-6 mg at night; Gargle, do not swallow, mouth rinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) or povidone-iodine (PVP-I) 2x/day.
https://covid19criticalcare.com
Thank you kindly, Allison.
I have watched Dr. Martenson vids about Wuhanvirus since January 2020. He and I would never agree politically. I categorize myself as a staunch conservative. But, on this one subject we certainly do seem to agree. Because of his warning about supply chain breaks back in February 2020, I was prepared.
Based on admissions on their podcasts, Dr. Weinstein and his wife, Dr. Heather Heying, would NOT agree with me politically either. Even though they have received backlash and ostracization for their stance on Wuhanvirus and Ivermectin, they remain steadfast. They were kicked off YouTube and are now on Odysee. At least these scientists don’t allow politics to cloud the science.
Dr. Bret Weinstein and Dr. Chris Martenson are on video saying they are taking Ivermectin prophylactically. Weinstein admitted to not liking to take any pharmaceutical but after perusing all the data he decided it was the logical course of action for him. I agree. Dr. Tess Lawrie and Weinstein declared on video that neither of them will be taking any EGT/Jab. Lawrie said the risks outweighed any benefit and the breakthrough cases of the vaccinated were troublesome(paraphrased).
One of my brothers has a son-in-law in the pharmaceutical industry and he told my brother that if you gargle with an alcohol based mouthwash twice a day you will not become infected with Wuhanvirus. The link between gum disease/infection and Wuhanvirus seems to be like the link between gum disease and heart disease.
Gum Disease Associated to COVID-19 and Other Medical Conditions | University of Utah Health
New Study Suggests COVID-19 Could Infect Lungs Via the Gums | Newsmax.com
Quercetin and Hydroxychloroquine are Zinc Ionophores which means they help to transport Zinc through cell membranes and the Zinc slows the replication process of Wuhanvirus. It is interesting to note that EVMS has Quercetin in its protocol.
Sad folks don’t have plasma/vitamin D3 levels of at least 60 ng/ml. That one thing could make a huge difference.
You’re welcome, Linda. Thanks for the great info. I am growing convinced that the best way forward will be to allow natural infection to spread throughout the non-vulnerable community, tempered by ivermectin and the various combinations of EARLY treatments that have proved efficacious over the last year or so. As of now, I prefer to keep the Ivermectin in reserve, only for use at the first signs of symptoms. However, were I one of a vulnerable population, I wouldn’t hesitate to use it prophylactically.
Dr. Tess Lawrie in her adorable Brit accent said Ivermectin should be in everyone’s cupboard.
More folks I know are procuring it for either Prophylactic usage or Early Treatment.
After my autoimmune disease diagnosis and hearing about “vaccine shedding of the Spike Protein” I decided on prophylactic use.
May we all make wise choices!!!!
One important thing to remember, that the wisdom of choice apply to that one person. And does not carry to another one. “worked for me, so everyone should do it” is the mantra of the quacks and wrongdoers.
If the doc suggests to have I in cupboard that is fine. It does no harm that way.
Suggesting to start taking it *without context* is just an evil.
True, and any such widespread use also risks the eventual dampening of its remarkable effectiveness, à la antibacterial everything in the 1970s and 80s.
Wise choices, indeed. State legislatures should debate the pros and cons of allowing Ivermectin to be sold over the counter. But since Big Pharma shoveled around $9 million to over 2,400 state legislators in 2020, seems likely they’ve traded our future health for their thirty pieces of silver.
Since Merck’s patent on Ivermectin expired, it isn’t willing to have anything to do with a study involving the anthelmintic.
Yes, the mighty dollar takes precedence over preventing suffering and death.
I agree! OTC Ivermectin would be beneficial.
Israeli scientist says COVID-19 could be treated for under $1/day – The Jerusalem Post (ampproject.org)
Small Excerpt Below:
Ivermectin has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 1987. The drug’s discoverers were awarded the 2015 Nobel Prize in medicine for its treatment of onchocerciasis, a disease caused by infection with a parasitic roundworm.
Over the years, it has been used for other indications, including scabies and head lice. Moreover, in the last decade, several clinical studies have started to show its antiviral activity against viruses ranging from HIV and the flu to Zika and West Nile.
IF aspirin were “discovered” today, would it pass the FDA??
It’s really confusing what you’re pushing for. Worldwide conspiracy?
Ivermectin HAS approval in most countries. Foe ages. Also it can be manufactured as genericum anywhere without possibility of fuss from Merck.
If it does all the wonders, how come no factory around the world picked it up to cover the world and make billions of profit?
The lobbyist may be strong enough to buy up the USA market, maybe a few other countries, but the whole world? Including places like China, India, Africa, where people are aplenty and cheap treatment is in good demand? And all the expensive alternatives are not viable to start with?
How Occam’s Razor, or elemetary reasoning instead of the fanatism?
I certainly agree that decisions on what goes as OTC and what not is more than arbitrary and too often reflects a lobby or the personal taste of a random burocrat. (And if I was in charge, most medicine ads would fall in the same category as alcohol and tobacco ads.)
But from that does not follow that people should stuff themselves with even more chemocals they have pretty little clue about. The painkillers are at least mostly consumed for due purpose: it pains, you take it. Otherwise you don’t. not one for breakfast for “prophylaxis”.
Many things in the organism can be “boosted” by chemicals — but doing so without a reason and proper timing is simply bad.