Get Woke, Eat Folk: Scientist Calls for Cannibalism to Combat Climate Change

Do Swedes taste like chicken?

Cannibalism doesn’t need to be taught or advocated for. Starvation will naturally cause it on its own past a certain point. Once there is no more food, any animal will eat anything, including its own species, and that includes humans. I understood that by day five of Survival, Evasion, Resistance & Escape (SERE) school in the military, when deprived of any food for 5 days, the fat guy in class was starting to look like a meal (not a good meal, but a meal…honestly, he could have fed 50 of us). You don’t know what true hunger is until you’ve experienced it. BUT…that is a condition induced by starvation. It has NOTHING to do with climate change. Nothing at all. It has to do with survival and nothing else. There is a point where human population needs to be controlled to prevent mass starvation; the same as for deer or bears or any other predator. But it’s a self-correcting process, and wars or disease or natural disasters (which could be the point of climate change) will naturally reduce it back to sustainable levels after a time. Advocating eating people is rather stupid. Cannibalism is a last-ditch survival mode. But climate change, which has far less to do with human activity than it does with solar activity, orbital mechanics and planetary tilt–which humans have NO control of–is not necessarily the “end” of humanity. The climate has always been changing; that is the natural state of life on Earth. Our perspectives are too short to realize it. We have only 6,000 years of written history, yet humanity is at least 200,000 years old, which means civilizations we have no idea of rose and fell long before the Sumerians ever created cuneiform written language, and we’re still here. We just have no record of them. We have survived countless centuries of climate change already. And global warming is actually better than global cooling if you think about it. Why? Food doesn’t grow when the Earth is an ice ball. This seems just another attempt to shock people to get attention for the social cause of “climate change,” which is unrealistic fear mongering on the part of many, and a desire for control by others (usually to get money), to change something they cannot change and to try to keep things just as they are…which is not the natural order of the universe. The only constant is change, and the Earth has always been changing. Things were far worse than now in the first 5 Ice Ages. Things were far worse environmentally in all the previous mass extinction events on Earth. But to advocate for people to try to stop the changing of the environment makes us no better than cockroaches. However, in that same vein of thinking, consider that that humans are basically bacteria that live on a floating rock hurtling through space. They can control what they eat and to some degree what they produce as pollution, but they do not control the rock. That’s reality. People need to accept the fact that they are not and never will be in control of reality.

Let’s eat, Grandma
Let’s eat Grandma

That was supposed to be a grammar and punctuation joke.

Also, as Soylent Green was just a bit before my time, so was the last “Population Bomb” scare when we thought we were going to run out of food. Now we’re *still* growing more than we need, so much so that we destroy a portion just to keep the prices above floor level.

To quote an unrelated movie, substituting “crisis” for the movie’s: They keep using that word. I do not think that word means what they think it means.