As a growing group of GOP Senators become man-made climate change believers, you have to ask: Did the science move them or just the political calculation that it’s “not worth the fight.”
Categories
GOP Senators Become Man-Made Climate Change Believers: “Not Worth the Fight”
As a growing group of GOP Senators become man-made climate change believers, you have to ask: Did the science move them or just the political calculation that it’s “not worth the fight.”

14 replies on “GOP Senators Become Man-Made Climate Change Believers: “Not Worth the Fight””
Don’t forget, the current crop of politicians on both sides were educated by the same elitist, socialist educators. Also, climate change became an issue after the former KGB and other soviet officials took over the environmental movement after the fall of the Soviet Union. The late John Coleman, the founder of The Weather Channel had a lot to say about this.
Bravo, all of you, but particularly Scott’s close!
That’s the most animated I’ve seen Scott ever!! That was quite enjoyable. I’m up in DC right now so maybe I’ll go over tomorrow to my senator’s office (Cronyn) and try to educate that RINO.
I should be thrilled at all of the people who pointed out that error, since it means they’re listening carefully. Alas…I’m afflicted with vanity which taints my enjoyment.
I got sent to the Group W bench w/ all the father rapers and mother stabbers. And the biggest, meanest, ugliest mother raper and father stabber looked at me ask said “What’d you do, kid?”. “We’ll, I.. I… I shaved a degree off the Historical Temperature Record.” And everyone moved away from me. “And disturbin’ the peace.” Then everyone moved back and we has a grand time there on the Group W bench.
Well, few politicians are leaders, fewer still leaders for good. And there’s a lot of money to grift in the name of climate change. In case you haven’t noticed, those guys like money.
Scott! You were exactly on pitch with the original Buffalo Springfield song! Really: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct8IizwCFNA
Hey, your closing argument was great, too, but we’re used to that. 🙂 Perfect or relative pitch is much rarer.
Also:
OTTMAR EDENHOFER, UN IPCC OFFICIAL: “But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.”
U.N. climate official Christiana Figueres: “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change [destroy] the economic development model [capitalism] that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.”
Thanks for the encouragement, Tim .
Strange how the people who call the loudest for separation of church and state are the first to demand that their death cult be sanctioned as the official religion of our government
Lindsey Graham is from South Carolina… unfortunately. As much wind as he blows, he blows with whatever wind is blowing.
And Steve, Yes, the facts are out there, in abundance, but everybody is programmed to ignore them.
David – I watched the first part of the video you posted in the member blog area. I recalled quite a bit of that but did not now the connection to Obama’s climate guru.
People ignore the past and try to act like it never happened.
I particularly like that he went back to the 1800s to see the hysteria.
First, it was Global Cooling. Followed with Global Warming. Then Climate Change. What is it really? A political grab for power and wealth. How convenient to change the name to reap a profit. Isn’t this a familiar tactic of the left?
At least 2 Billion dollars are available for grants on “Climate Change.” Want some free money? Propose a study at Harvard titled, The Impacts of Climate Change in the Fashion Industry. Bet you’d get funded. Instead, spend a few minutes (40) on the following presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYoOcaqCzxo
You’ll note the title; Here is the evidence of the Fatal Flaw in ‘Climate Change’ Science .. In A Way You Can Understand. It presents many of the geo-solar contributions conveniently left out of the “models” that only focus on the human impact on “Climate Change.” It also points out a few of the specifically chosen examples that make little sense, like less snow cover in the spring — DOOH!
The presentation identifies what a complex system the Earth is and how the weather systems and solar radiation (other than just heat) help maintain a global temperature equilibrium, and why the Global Mean Temperature has varied by no more than 2 degrees C, in spite of much increased CO2.
{Bill you are correct; there is not a Standard Temperature – but there is a Global Mean Temperature. Interesting that it is about 57F or 15C! Set your altimeter to “standard” climbing through the TA.}
The presentation does not suggest we should not worry, but instead focus on pollution for other than climate reasons and not the doomsday predictions of charlatans – posing as scientists. For both those with and without a science background – you’ll find the details interesting and perhaps wanting to review more. The tagline of the YouTube offers the following links to consider:
https://twitter.com/NOAAClimate
https://twitter.com/ipcc_ch
https://www.facebook.com/IPCC
And a link to the presenters, The Suspicious Observers web-presence: https://suspicious0bservers.org/
No doubt, pollution sucks, but climate science and politicians do too.
That 5 – 10 years until it’s too late and we’re all doomed con goes all the way back to the beginnings of this ridiculous pseudo-science. Some commenter on Instapundit posted a link to a Scientific American article the other day about how Exxon suppressed a global warming report they had commissioned. What was notable about it was that it included that very line, 5 -10 years and then we’re doomed. That was in 1976.