I hear people talking about the unintended consequences of lockdown, namely depression that leads to alcoholism, drug abuse, domestic violence and suicide. The WHO has even come out against them. What if is not unintended? What if it is a way for the ruling class to clamp down on the throats of those miserable peons who dared think for themselves? The evidence seems to point in that direction. We have States that have locked down showing an increase in infections while the Media Industrial Complex (MIC) praises their efforts. At the same time, the very same MIC decries States that have trusted in their People to make the right choices for themselves being labeled as anti-science, even though their infection rate is not as high. The effects of lockdown are exactly what those in power want, namely depressed, anxious sheep cowering in their homes and hiding behind masks, deathly terrified of a virus that is not nearly as deadly as they would like you to believe. If they truly felt that lockdowns worked, they themselves would follow them. Instead, we have our betters going out and enjoying themselves and being served by the very people to whom they are denying the same activities. None of them wear masks unless they are virtue signaling for the MIC. They only listen to the science when it fits their narrative, and they employ Big Tech (BT) to squash any news stories that they deem harmful to the Party. There are no stories to be found coming from the MIC about the astronomical increase in suicide around the world, especially in Japan. Alcoholism and drug abuse are skyrocketing, fueled on by States shutting down any form of entertainment, leaving liquor stores open, and legalizing drugs for recreational use, leaving in its wake millions of people disconnected from reality and close to the edge of mental breakdowns. Kids being kept home from school when the science shows that not only are children statistically immune from C-19, but they do not have the receptors to be carriers, has led to an increase in child abuse. The school system is one of the leading reporters of suspected abuse. So when you shut down the schools, you lock children in with their abusers, with no way to reach out for help. This is complete totalitarianism. This is forced compliance to policies that any sane person can see do not work. It is time that we say no. We will not lock down, we will not cower, and we will not be ruled.
Categories
6 replies on “It Is A Feature, Not A Bug”
And we WILL BE FREE!! Whether Lock Down Newsom and his adherent cronies like it or not!!
Is it possible that the Lock Downs were the quickest response that arose in a panic (a kind of Super Quarantine), and only into the process did people like Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer realize how powerful a political tool they can be, and maybe closer on to the election a way of facilitating the kind of Voter Fraud that maybe ensured that the election has been stolen?
Another post a couple of days ago suggested that one is not allowed to ask certain questions, because, well, political correctness. I submit, the following is some of which may qualify.
I have wondered from the beginning about the timing of the release; about whether it was intentional or accidental. Like so many other things (the loss of helicopter “Extortion 17” for instance – which Benghazi effectively covered up), we are left to ponder the possibility w/o hard evidence.
2.2 million deaths they originally predicted; while the mortality rate has needed padding just to reach 200,000.
It’s a “novel” virus they warned. Yet coronavirus is a common, relatively well known specie with certain known traits and treatments. This particular strain is allegedly not all that different from the others.
Like the “church lady” was known to say, “How convenient?”
Research into “gain of function” was moved to the Wuhan lab because such research became “prohibited” in this country. That certain people – currently pushing the vaccine narrative – stand to profit off it, and were allegedly instrumental in funding the research in Wuhan, is yet another of those topics not allowed to be uttered.
Add to that the alleged philosophical background of one of the primary “movers” in this shaken issue and we get the latest “rumor” that their touted vaccine may affect human reproduction (not for the better), in line with the alleged philosophical background.
Taken by itself, it can easily be dismissed as conjecture. When one adds in the reality of political violence in certain jurisdictions being officially tolerated, and the selection of someone barely capable of coherent sentences as a “party” candidate for office, one is left to ponder those questions we’re not allowed to ask.
It seems oddly familiar, sort of like the book of Esther, with political types being horrible, evil people.
Esther 1 ESV – The King’s Banquets – Now in the – Bible Gateway
It is long past time. I’ve been saying and writing this very thing for several months with a naive hope that more people will assert their individual liberties and refuse to comply with the oligarchs’ decrees.
I stand by what I started saying back in February:
You can suggest that people wear masks, social distance, not gather unless it’s absolutely necessary, and I have no problem with it.
You can ask people to do those things. You can strongly recommend those things. No problem, although you may need to back up your recommendations.
You can beg and plead for people to do those things, still no problem.
But when you demand it, when you order it? Sit on it and bounce, we’re Americans, we have rights here.
And that holds true whether our alleged leaders do those things or not. The only thing their own compliance changes is that it makes it clear that they don’t take such things seriously themselves.