Three women who intentionally violated a Laconia, New Hampshire, ordinance by publicly exposing their chests, will not make their case before the Supreme Court of the United States. The court refuses to hear their claim unfair treatment under the law, a 14th Amendment Constitutional challenge, despite the all of the memes and celebrity support for the so-called #FreeTheNipple cause.
Bill Whittle Now with Scott Ott is a production of our Members. Join them now and find your people.
Visit
Join our common sense cruise, with Bill Whittle, Scott Ott and Stephen Green, May 15-18, aboard the Royal Caribbean Navigator of the Seas. You’ll mingle with folks who love this show, talk with the hosts in casual settings, and enjoy luxury, laughter, great food, sun-drenched days and relaxing nights. Find out more and reserve your cabin.
- Support us at Patreon.
- Watch us on Fire TV.
- Ask Alexa: “Play Bill Whittle Network on TuneIn Radio”
15 replies on “Keep It Covered: Supreme Court Refuses to Hear #FreeTheNipple Case”
Let’s bring this back to science, boys. What part of the man’s body gets engorged when aroused? Now ask a woman the same question. Case closed.
Testing the argument via principle:
Bill’s line of reasoning would have equally been made against women displaying ankles or bare arms in 1850 or wearing trousers in 1890.
We’ve also got a number of natural-born American citizens in places like Dearborn, MI who would make the argument against women displaying bare heads in public, and could undoubtedly make Bill’s “decency” argument in favor of a public ordinance requiring it.
So, serious question: what makes Bill’s argument different from those above apart from mere degree or “well, it is the current cultural norm to prohibit display of that body part while accepting the display of other body parts which were themselves prohibited on the same moral/decency/tradition grounds when they were first publicly displayed over much howling and objection”?
Segue right into Sir Roger Scruton
video….https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFBmNQJQT4Y
Nip? Tuck!
The huge irony is that these folk are same the ones who defend a certain faith’s tendency to insist that women cover not just their nipples but their hair and faces!
Does the company Speedo have MAGA on it? 😉 Just asking.
If that is the case, then it probably stands for “Make America Groan Again.” Or was that groin?
Guys, you missed the whole point, you need to redo tbis segment again
Nudity, to my understanding, is when someone is showing his/her sex organ
For weman, un like man (i know – strange that i need to point it out) the breast is defined as a sex organ.
Now does it matter?
Ask any woman, even one of these 3 dummies, if someone touches you (with out your consent) in your breast – do you want to be able to file a sexual harassment complaint?
Yes or no?
Now since i have already been engaged in such a conversation before, there next move will be to want to defined the male breast as sexual organs as well, and from this point on – they will start screaming, and that Will be the end of it
Tradition and the-way-we-have-always-done is the worst possible argument in favor of any position. At best it is an emotional argument rather than a rational reality based one. The next worst argument is the-majority-wants-it-that-way. This is an argument from authority, might makes right, AND emotion. There is a huge difference between the contingent human whim about what “should be” and what actually should be for humans to live and thrive.
To be rational and OBJECTIVE about your argument is hard and time consuming. It is fraught with possibility of error. Even so, it is far better than all of the shoot from the hip I-feel, I-don’t-want-to-think, I-will-force-you arguments. Thoughtless mob action is ALWAYS wrong. Simply because you FEEL you want something is not a valid reason for ANYTHING!
How about live and let live, associate and trade with the willing, go peacefully your own way if you disagree, and leave forcing another to do what he is not otherwise do out of the picture? No? I guess it is so much easier to force your fellow humans than freely trade value for value to mutual benefit. Don’t think about it. Just club the person who has what you want and take it. That forces me to build a better club and hit you first! That is no way to build a civilization. However, it is a good way to have constant war of all against all (the way we have always done it).
These are likely the same women who would complain about people looking at their breasts or “raping” them with their eyes as the walked down the street. Yawn, these people do not have enough to worry about in their lives. Makes me think about the R/k discussions in TSL.
I am sure some of our more creative and artist type members can come up with some meme’s with the Right Angle crew modeling the company speedo.
“Company Speedo” ???
Yuck!
So much for “common sense”, which defines many things requiring more covering than that offered by Speedo.
I’ll only sign up for the cruise if the ship enacts some “Common Sense Speedo Control” legislation
The greatest trick feminists ever played was convincing young women that taking their cloths off in public was empowering.
h/t Kaiser Sose
Thanks. I did not remember that quote from Kaiser Sose. 😉
I prefer the more fundamental assertion:
Weren’t those women part of a barbershop quartet from Skokie, IL?