Categories
Right Angle

Monkeypox: An Inconvenient Truth (This Video Is Not on YouTube)

The science is clear about the spread of the latest contagion we’re all supposed to fear. But public health officials shrink from discouraging the very behavior they KNOW makes it a contagion.

Some issues are too important to discuss on YouTube. The science is clear about the spread of the latest contagion we’re all supposed to fear. But public health officials shrink from discouraging the very behavior they KNOW makes it a contagion.

Right Angle is a production of our Members. When you join, you unlock access to backstage content, and you connect with thousands of committed, conservative patriots on our comments, forums and the Member-written blog. Tap the big green button above to join.

If you liked this video, and want to say so, click the big blue button at our site to make a one-time or recurring donation with PayPal or credit card.

Listen to the Audio Version

54 replies on “Monkeypox: An Inconvenient Truth (This Video Is Not on YouTube)”

Who was the doctor who became famous at the front end of the AIDS epidemic? A guy named Anthony Fauci. You can find old videos of him spreading fear about the virus.

I got a mRNA vaccine shot to protect me from falling hammers. It works just as well as the COVID shot…

I wonder how long until dem governors start ordering old folks homes to take in people who have monkey pox and forcing them to allow these people to sleep in the same beds with the elderly residents?

I survived the AIDS by getting a military style haircut. No action for singles at a bar unless you looked like a mandatorily tested military man.

That’s amazing … That you would perpetrate an intentional premeditated deception like that then brag about it. That deception would work right up until the moment someone asked you what branch of the military you were serving in. Or did you deceive them about that too, just to get some “action” in a singles bar?

Two additional points:
The Small pocks vaccine came about because they noticed that milk maids who got cow pocks did not develop Small pocks. So to some degree, pocks is pocks.
Also, we still require Dr.s to report venereal diseases to public health officials, but after AIDS came about, they were not allowed to report it. They passed laws to prevent it from being disclosed.
One last thing, to all these crocked health officials: A POCKS ON ALL OF YOUR HOUSES!

Lol, good one but the word is “pox” not “pocks”. Pox is a disease, a pock is the mark or scar left by a disease so “pocks” is plural and are the marks, pits or craters left on healed skin after getting the pox. Chicken pox leaves a lot of pocks on your skin — 🙂

Just FYI for future reference. At least that’s the way it works in American English, I don’t try to keep up with grammar and such for the other English speaking countries.

BTW, I had a problem months ago getting logged on, the site saying I was banned or denied access etc. Scott had to fix it, there was nothing I could do from my end. Make sure that any browser extensions, ad blockers, script blockers etc. are turned off or set to ignore billwhittle.com too. There’s nothing on this site to worry about and anonymous usage information helps the enterprise provide a better website.

Whatever he did, this site has worked flawlessly for me ever since.

I don’t know if you’re using a VPN too but those can also be problematic. If you’re not using a VPN then this doesn’t apply.

Some CDNs (Content Delivery Networks) ban the exit IPs for pretty much all VPNs. It’s not the panacea cure-all that Michael Knowles Daily Wire advertisers would like everyone to think it is.

There is a good reason for them to do this so I don’t turn my VPN on unless I need the privacy factor for some reason. That sort of reason being my own private business so I am not answering questions along that line in an open, public venue.

You could try connecting through a different host on your VPN if you’re using one. Try to use host servers that are in the US too. Using a foreign server doesn’t add anything to your VPNs efficacy and it slows your ping times way down so things time out waiting for an ack. They’re either keeping logs or they’re not and you have no real way to know they’re doing what they say they are. I don’t like getting DMC takedown letters so I apply my VPN judiciously and sparingly.

If you’re concerned about your Internet Service Provider (ISP) monitoring your internet usage, and you should be, there’s a simple way to fix that. Just use a different DNS server than the one they tell you to use in your internet settings on your router. Search for “Public DNS providers” on your favorite search engine. Read up a little and pick whichever one seems best to you.

Domain Name Services (DNS) requests go to a DNS provider where the domain name is translated to its numerical IP address through the DNS registry listings. So every request to a DNS server HAS to know where you want to go on the internet and most log those requests.

That’s how your ISP tracks your web traffic, if they want to. (They also ping your system for open server ports on a regular basis and do other things I wish they would not but it’s part of the game and goes with the territory.)

Using a public DNS server keeps your ISP out of your business. No DNS requests sent to your ISP’s DNS servers means they don’t know where you’re trying to connect to and can’t see your connections easily. They can still see that if they really want to but that’s the most common, cheapest and easiest way. Of course the public DNS server has to know where you’re going on the internet so it’s a compromise. There is no way around this except to use a VPN and proxy and then the DNS server knows you’re connecting to a VPN service system anyway.

Try not to get too paranoid about this stuff. If you do you can disappear down a rabbit hole real fast and it’s not worth it. Part of the safety is in numbers and obscurity. If you don’t give them any reason to watch your traffic then can’t afford the time, hardware, bandwidth and personnel to watch everyone so you know the old “gray man” thing is operative here. Read up a little bit and do what you can without breaking your internet connection completely. If you have any questions, ask.

Hey, “woman” doesn’t mean woman anymore and “recession” doesn’t mean recession anymore. So…there you go. In the future “famine” won’t mean famine and “starvation” won’t mean starvation.

Ha! And more’s the pity. I’ll still keep using the traditional, unaltered meanings of words anyway.

The Left, like any other cult, tries to redefine and invent words. They can only succeed if we let them. I choose not to let them, you may do as you like. I would prefer that you join me in keeping our language succinct and correct but that choice is up to the individual. It’s still mostly a free country, I’d like it to stay that way or get more free so I’ll stick with what words actually mean rather than what some pimple-faced purple land whale and her beta male thrall try to make it.

“Famine” is now called “Government Dietary Realignment”, and “starvation” will be referred to as “Government Nutritional Regulation”.
Your attention to these changes in the approved lexicon is required, plebe.

Sometimes the consequences of sin manifest before the wages of sin.
On another note, did this video get taken down from BlueTube, or did you just not post it because you were ‘afraid’ it would? I really hope it’s not the latter, because, with all due respect, that’s a bit cowardly.
As I always say, I shall fear nothing of this world, because I know God, I fear God, because He knows me.
Plus, if it were removed, you’d get a ton more press about that fact, and subsequently, you’d get a ton more views. Just sayin’…since you haven’t been bombarded with video bans like Crowder, or Bongino, you’d just get a slap on the wrist (video removal). And it would end up on other news sources which would give you more views. I love you guys, but never be afraid to get a video banned. It’s how you get noticed.

Also, Scott…your web host keeps banning me…still. I have to jump through hoops just to comment. Not only must I turn off my VPN, I also have to delete the cookies every single time I comment. It’s getting really annoying.

I’m working on that recent issue. It has affected even me. I’m hoping it’s something that can be fixed with a software update.

It was the latter, but for a good reason. They are on their last strike with Bluetube. All their videos have been stored for years and they don’t have backups for many. A permanent ban would means losing them all for good.

Okay…well, maybe we should start ripping the old ones, so they have them. It’d be better to know which ones they don’t have backed up first though. Surely we can safely assume anything prior to them coming to Rumble would possibly be missing from their library. It would take probably close to a terabyte of space of course…lol.

Yeah, nothing “cowardly” going on here. The Guys knew this one would get them a strike and they’re already on shaky ground on YouTube. Bill got a strike a while back on something he didn’t anticipate. This one was easy to anticipate.

It’s not cowardly to use another door when you know the one you generally use is going to get slammed in your face. Discretion is the better part of valor.

It’s not just that YouTube will absolutely take down this video, if that’s all it was you might have a point. That’s not the case, there’s a lot more at stake than just having a video taken down. If you don’t know that you ought not go around calling people “cowards”.

It’s pretty easy to throw around words like “cowardly” when you’re not the one taking any risks. This is a commercial enterprise, they need to make money to pay their bills the same as anyone else. Doing something you know is going to pinch off a revenue stream isn’t “brave” or “bold”, it’s stupid.

To be honest, people who say things like you did really honk me off. I’m trying to hold my temper and be nice here but that’s hard for someone like me to do. Because if your idea of “brave” hinges on posting a video or not then you really don’t have much of a grasp of this situation. Or the scale of what constitutes bravery.

Leave it to you to cock off with an attitude about it. Perhaps you could use more Jesus in your life.

While I agree with Michael Teutsch, in regard to not having the old videos backed up, and they should rectify that, but cowering to BlueTube is still cowardly (not that I still believe that’s the case here).

Dan Bongino stood his ground with them, and is much better off without them. Then again of course, Dan has a much larger following and a lot more money behind him. And Crowder keeps pushing them every single day, and he’s actually still there.

So, all things considered, I can agree that pushing the envelope in this case, might do more harm than good. I just don’t need your pissy altitude. You might find your views will be taken more seriously if you tried a little tact, and less ad homs.

Calling people cowards is tactful? Take your own advice. Of course, you won’t, you never do.

First you get all whiny because some of the videos are not on Rumble where you want them to be.

Then you call people cowards because a video is not on YouTube where you want it to be.

Then when called on your duplicity you cravenly walk back your accusations of cowardice …

“,,, but cowering to BlueTube is still cowardly (not that I still believe that’s the case here).”

… though it’s funny you accidentally admit I was right in the first place and you had no justification to call anyone a “coward”. Had you simply thought that through, and had you any idea of what the stakes and situation are, you could have saved yourself the humiliation of calling people ad hominem names like “cowardly” that unlike you they did not merit.

Then you have the balls to lecture me on tact.

And as far as Jesus goes, He told you to worry about the beam in your own eye before the mote in someone else’s eye. More of your own advice you never follow and using Jesus as a cudgel to justify your insipid whining is as un-Christian, disgusting and as tactless as it gets. All while being nothing resembling surprising coming from you.

This isn’t about me being “cocked off with an attitude”, whatever that means. It’s about you being an unmitigated ass and at some level you know that else you wouldn’t have tried to walk back your accusations of cowardice. You choose to call me names and try to beat me over the head with Jesus just to cover up your perfidy. That’s pathetic, tactless and juvenile.

I’ve said what I have to say, people can judge for themselves whether I’m right or not. I don’t care enough to continue this puerile conversation with you. I will not indulge any more of your childish bickering. My reply to anything else you have to say to me is …

YYSSW

I was warned about you by a bunch of other members. Your comments will be henceforth ignored. And I wasn’t complaining about a video not showing up on Rumble when I wanted it to, it was because they weren’t putting it on Rumble period.
There’s a reason Bongino and Steven Crowder have a much larger following, and it’s because they don’t cave to the cancel culture of BlueTube. Bravery above all else.

A. I was listening to NPR yesterday and they did a “history” of Monkeypox starting in 2017 – beginning with an African doctor.
Somewhere in narrative, they noted the virulent spread was prevalent in gay men.
I don’t know if NPR actually acknowledged that it was spread by Mano a Mano sex after the narrative story as I only listen to snippets of NPR and turned it off.
But… I developed a rash a couple weeks ago and looking up the symptoms, I messaged my doctor at that time wondering if it could be Monkeypox.
I saw my dermatologist yesterday and explained that I did not know what caused monkeypox when I messaged before.
She laughed and said no… obviously…
Which indicated to me that the doctors are fully aware of how one catches monkeypox.

B. I keep on looking for Moving Back to America on YouTube and don’t find it.
Now I see why. (I rarely attend Billwhittle or Rumble – too tough to start/ stop/ save/ come back again a day later to pick up where I left off)
So now, yer makin’ me come here to catch up!
Huh!
If I up my subscription will y’all YouTube them?
(Oops. I just went to “catch up” and see they ended June 2nd. I guess I did see them. Sorry.)

Great segment. Glad you did it. Glad I saw it.

I do want to point something out about the last thing you mentioned about vaccines.

Vaccines against polio and smallpox and others and such provide immunity because of the nature of the viruses, not because of the nature of the vaccines.

This whole talking point our side has about the “redefinition of the word vaccine” is a fool’s errand. It’s a minor quibble over some really minor semantics in the alignment of the “dictionary definition” to the way we’ve been using the word for decades.

The deal is, vaccines don’t give you immunity. They don’t. They never have. They induce it. Your immune system gives you the immunity.

If you’d never been vaccinated and you had smallpox and survived it, you have lifelong immunity to it just as if you’d been vaccinated. Again, it’s got nothing to do with the vaccine, except for you developed the immunity, in the case of the vaccine, without having to come down with smallpox, the disease.

Now — “the flu” goes around every year and tons of people catch it. But nobody gets lifelong immunity from the flu from having it, and nobody gets lifelong, or, as it turns out, necessarily much SHORT TERM immunity — from a vaccine (and we’ve been calling it a “vaccine” for decades), either. This is because of the nature of the viruses, not the vaccines. (you probably get SOME immunity from it, but we’ll get to that in a minute).

What you usually get is a quicker immune response to the virus if you DO get infected (and this, in fact, is also what happens with smallpox and other vaccines for “eradicated” diseases). The difference is, smallpox et all 1) doesn’t replicate rapidly (not nearly as rapidly as a cold or flu virus) and your immune response is ramped up fast enough to kill the infection (yes, you do still get infected, albeit very minor) … before the actual disease it causes in you develops. And 2) A flu virus mutates more quickly (partially because of their fast replication, and partly because of their rapid spread) — enough to get you sick before your immune system has ramped up the armies of antibodies it needs to effectively fight the infection.

SARS-COV2 (the virus that causes the disease COVID-19) is a flu virus. SARS was considered a flu virus, and SARS-COV2 … as you can guess by looking at the name, is a very close relative. We give flu vaccines (and again, we called them “vaccines”) every year, and they help many people some in that they have less likelihood of getting as sick with the flu as badly as they would otherwise have. Most of them are still going to get sick if exposed to it. But it likely won’t be as bad. So I’m out of work for 3 or 4 days instead of 7 to 10, or maybe whereas grandpa might have died had he not had as rapid an immune response as he did with the vaccine — doesn’t die.

It would be better for us here who believe in personal freedom and the freedom not to have something involuntarily injected into your body to acknowledge that we really haven’t re-defined anything — we’ve clarified. And I’ve got no problem with that. There is plenty of other stuff we can go after in how badly the pandemic was handled.

But stuff like this just makes us look bad. It’s practically irrelevant.

As a matter of fact, such an acknowledgement leads into the NEXT point we SHOULD be making, is that unless vaccine technology advances A LOT … there will be no number of COVID vaccines or boosters we can mandate that will get rid of the disease. It’s here to stay, and it will go around along with other flues every year. This one’s a bit worse than others, especially to certain demographics. And those people should be the ones deciding whether or not their risk is high enough to get a vaccine.

Dumb question time: why did we stop inoculating against small pox? I mean, yeah, I know we eradicated it from nature but it would seem like we might want to keep inoculating against it just because it’s also going to protect us from everything in that family of diseases.
For instance, since I was born in 1980, I am not inoculated against small pox and apparently you have to be in the military to get the inoculation these days.
— G.K.

…ok Steve, I understand that we don’t want to “paint with too broad a brush” when talking about the gay community. What I want to know is WHEN are the gays who are NOT involved with multiple partners going to take a stand against these crazy “pride parades” and public displays of bizaarness, some involving kids ?

For just one recent example, familiarize yourself with the Gays Against Groomers organization.

When the lock downs started two years ago, I told my friends, “Mark my words. The left has learned a new trick and there WILL be a new pandemic every two or three years from now on.” Right on queue.
I don’t like being so negative. Mainly because it turns out right more than half of the time. I look forward to the day when that is more wrong than right.

Nothing wrong with being right, as long as you’re willing to admit errors as well. We shoudn’t shy away from truth.

Yeah … Stigma is the word that works best here …

Noun: stigma

  1. A symbol of disgrace or infamy
  2. A skin lesion that is a diagnostic sign of some disease

Yup, that word fits like it was custom made for this situation. Stigmatize the hell out of these filthy animals. I don’t care that they’re gay, I’d feel exactly the same way about heterosexuals engaged in the heterosexual version of this behavior.

If your sexuality rules your life to the degree that you are unable to refrain from known dangerous sexual behavior then you’ve intellectually accepted the risk. Part of the risk is being stigmatized for that behavior. No one is putting a gun to anyone’s head and forcing them to participate in bacchanalian debauchery.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

As for those two kids who were diagnosed with monkey pox, they come from a “gay” family of two men. I’d like there to be a very, very thorough investigation into exactly how those two kids caught that disease. I’d say it’s prima facie evidence of sexual child abuse.

Disagree with your last point. It’s transmitted by prolonged skin to skin contact. That could just be hugging. You could be right that there may be abuse happening, but leaping to such a conclusion is unwarranted.

If those kids got monkey pox from their gay “parents” then whether they got it by direct sexual abuse or not is irrelevant. Those gay men live in a manner that is unhealthy to those kids. The proof of that is that it HAS BEEN unhealthy for those kids because having a generally sexually transmitted disease usually contracted through unprotected gay sexual activity IS by simple definition unhealthy.

Add that to the fact that those kids did get monkey pox and that they had to get that disease one way or another from their parents and there is sufficient cause to investigate how they’re being treated. Coincidence is not causation but coincidence is also grounds for justifiable suspicion. If the situation did not involve gay men it would be investigated and rightly so. There is grounds to suspect abuse without dismissing it out of hand as “unwarranted”. Refusing to look into the matter more thoroughly is irresponsible.

I was not but I know people who were abused as children. It is such a despicable practice that it should be investigated whenever and wherever there is anything resembling a reasonable suspicion. There might not be anything untowards happening but if there is those kids need help and they need it now. The fact that these two gay “parents” contracted that particular disease and passed it on to children in their care is more than sufficiently reasonable suspicion. You can disagree but your disagreement does not change my mind on that matter in the least.

I would advise everyone to look up the book “And the band played on”. It tells the story of how the first case of what was to be called AIDS was brought home to North America from Africa by an Air Canada male flight attendant. It describes in detail how the “Gay” community first tried to calm any fears of mass infection because they feared being quarantined like lepers. Then, when they realized the only way they could get enough money allocated to get treatments or vaccines developed, they did a one eighty on that approach. Gay sex practices (also vividly described in the book) are NOTHING like those of straights unless they happen to be nymphomaniacs or their male conterparts. Ever heard of a “Glory Hole”? That’s in there too. Just a little study on the sexual practices of many in the gay community will convince you that they are anything but an “Alternate Lifestyle”.

I think it’s more of a hedonistic lifestyle where it’s all about themselves and trying to avoid consequences (public or private). And it’s not just gay men… we all do it to some extent, trying to skate by on something, or trying to shortcut something. You can pick your choices, but you don’t always get to pick the consequences of your actions – especially if it involves someone else.

The only reason why the government scared the entire population about AIDS is they thought that if they told the truth, that it primarily affected gay men and IV drug users, the general population would not have been willing to pay the cost, to find treatments or a cure. The gay community pushed the lie that anyone can get AIDS and they are doing the same with Monkey Pox. I also agree that if I knew that doing a certain behavior could potentially result in a disease like Monkey Pox or AIDS, I would refrain from that behavior. Having unprotected sex is something a normal person can avoid, it is not like breathing or eating, but our society has put it’s stamp of approval on engaging in bad behavior and no longer puts a stigma, on people who behave badly. I bet Monkey pox would disappear if gay men stopped having sex with strangers for a month, but you would be castigated as a Homophobe if you made that suggestion.

It’s obvious that something needs to be flattened, but it’s not generally-applicable to the world’s population — regardless of the political elites’ claims of crisis.

I’m not sure where Bill read about the smallpox vaccine working for monkeypox. Maybe it does, but back when I looked into getting a smallpox vaccine after 9/11, everything I read said that the smallpox vaccine was only good for about 25 years (so all those folks given the shot when they were schoolkids back during the darkest days of the Cold War were effectively no longer protected).
Given that, I’d say the greatest likelihood for why older people were getting monkeypox at much lower rates is because they are engaging in the risky activities associated with it at much lower rates (e.g. even older gay men are less likely to be having orgies and lots of partners).

That’s interesting to me because I had to get the full range of vaccinations during military/government service so I was given the smallpox vaccine multiple times. They stopped doing that because it was discovered through long term studies that boosting the smallpox vaccine wasn’t really doing much if anything. You can read about the technical aspects of this study here —

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2610468/

The page goes into a fair amount of technical detail. I’ll save you and anyone else the trouble of reading all of that by quoting the relevant information to your post by copy/paste below …

… a single vaccination elicits functional antibody that remains stable over the lifetime.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

  • Vaccinia elicits antiviral antibody levels and virus neutralizing activity that remain elevated for the life of the patient.
  • Multiple vaccinations achieve only marginally higher levels of antibody and virus neutralizing activity than single vaccination.
  • Levels of antibodies and virus neutralizing activity are comparable in vaccinated individuals and those who developed smallpox and recovered.
  • Vaccinia should be used first on individuals who have never been vaccinated before.

Public Health no longer is. I’m hearing now that one of the nasty side effects is that after all of the Wuhan Flu lies there’s a growing number of parents who are hesistant to get any vaccinations for their children. Well done CDC, well done.

So true. My college educated, extraordinary daughter-in-law was convinced that the 40-50 vaccines that they are recommending for her three sons is overkill and probably responsible for many unexplained issues. Unfortunately, Candace Owens promulgates this meme. Candace is bright, and may even be correct on some counts, but the health professional that saves the most lives is the nurse who gives those vaccines. The efforts of doctors and others pale in comparison.

And when there’s active decisions being made to combine flu, covid and MMR vaccines, you can certainly kill off any vaccine program.

The erosion of public trust is a natural and easily anticipated result of the abuse of that trust. Trust of any sort, public or otherwise, is a hard thing to earn, an easy thing to lose and a nearly impossible thing to regain once lost.

Anthony Fauci et. al. squandered the public trust for their own personal ambitions. I hope someday there can be found a way to make them accountable for doing that.

Leave a Reply