President Trump encourages his supporters to chant “12 more years” as the campaign releases a 50-point plan for the new Trump agenda. What can Donald Trump accomplish before the 2024 election train leaves the station?
Here’s a from the Trump campaign.
Scott Ott, Stephen Green, and Bill Whittle, create 20 new episodes of Right Angle each month because our Members fund it. They do much more, creating their own content that rivals, and often exceeds the power and wit of our three happy warriors.
Listen to the Audio Version
Bill Whittle Network · New Trump Agenda: The Official Plan for His Next 12 Years in the White House
19 replies on “New Trump Agenda: The 50-Point Plan for His Next 12 Years in the White House”
Trying to do everything that “must” be done all at once is a sure way to fail. The reason being is the Pareto Principle: 80% of the results can be obtained by doing the right 20% of the work. Hence, one must be smart about the selection of what to do next. That means doing the 20% effort that gets 80% of the results until that which is left to do is irrelevant.
See: http://www.pinnicle.com/Articles/Pareto_Principle/pareto_principle.html
What I have used for many decades to be my next task selector is to do next that which must be done or there is no point in doing anything else. As a lone wolf developer, this had to be the most important next thing to do. For Trump and his adminstration, the doing of more than one thing at a time is possible. Say perhaps the top three things. As near as I can tell, this is exactly what he is doing. Not the popular things to do it is the most important things to do.
The problem with doing the popular thing, you are most likely doing the 80% effort thing that gets only 20% result or worse. There are almost an unlimited number of those kinds of things. Doing them first gives little to no impact upon on the end results and is not much better than doing nothing. Especially, if you focus on those things selected by your “loyal” opposition.
Again: do first, that which if not done, there would be no point in dong anything else. Then do the next in line until the doing becomes irrelevant.
I’m perusing the 50 point list just now, and what do I see? “Pass Congressional Term Limits”
Yes, YES, YES! This will be a difficult one though, because it will probably need the cooperation of creatures who would be term limited. But I can dream, can’t I?
JP had a good one on the being censored by big tech the other day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGxbaxviRVw
Trump has a sense of humor in a way his opponents don’t.
Steve, Alaska may be the last frontier for more than the altruistic ideal but for freedom as well. You are welcome, with open arms.
They are FRAUDS and engage in Fraudulent activity. They hare the NEW troglodyte class and it has NOTHING to do with a Cave.;
230 delende est!
12 more years!!!
I’m just venting, but did you know Pelosi is trying to get the debates CANCELLED?? I sent a message to her congressional website and told her go to hell! We cannot let Biden win this election. Please vote for DJT!! For one more year!
That little talk Nancy had with the press that you’re referring to … Where she said to, get this, the media, “Don’t tell him I said so but … I don’t think Joe Biden should debate Trump”, then gave the reason for her opinion as being it would be demeaning to debate the POTUS — Was the clearest evidence so far that the Democrats are running very, very scared.
Don’t look at their words, those are carefully crafted to deceive. Look at what they do. What she’s doing is trying to give Joe Biden a plausible excuse not to debate Donald Trump. Refusing to debate Donald Trump would be the final nail in the coffin of Joe’s campaign so the only explanation for Nancy’s position is that she knows debating Trump would be even worse for Biden’s campaign than coming up with some lame excuse not to. Nancy knows things about Joe that she’s not telling us, and she never will.
Telling Joe not to debate Trump is all defense and no offense. She’s backed into a corner with Biden and she knows it very well. Nancy Pelosi is mean and she’s evil but she’s far from stupid.
Running a campaign solely on the plank “We don’t want you to vote for the other guy because we hate him” is about the worst political strategy I can recall in living memory. In that press conference you can hear the hatred of Donald Trump dripping from Nancy Pelosi’s fangs like the poison that it is.
Nancy is afraid and she’s right to be fearful.
Here’s another link to “President Trump’s Second Term Agenda list:
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/08/24/trump-releases-his-second-term-agenda-n2574894
PS. The only lists I’ve seen for biden was all about giving “teachers” and “public” schools” lots and lots of more money, more national lock downs, and mandatory mask wearing. Grr.
If the parties really had the interests of the people at heart and wanted to be held accountable for their respective agendas, they would publish them as equivalent of Gingrich’s Contract with America and expect to be held to it by the electorate. Whatever you may think about Newt personally, he is still one of the smartest conservative/ Republican personages out there.
I have a vague recollection from Sept. 2007 that Newt indicated if he had had access to $30M he would have entered the 2007-2008 campaign, probably beaten out McCain, and then made mincemeat of Obama. But we can’t build a world on woulda/ shoulda/ coulda; and we engineers need to curtail our urge to make “better the enemy of good enough”. 🙂
I like all your answers, but each is really a task of 1000s of subtasks. So better get started, Mr. President.
Number one thing to accomplish if we take back the House, regain strength in the Senate, and reelect Trump is term limits.
If we are citing “number one” things to address, I would suggest the national debt and entitlements instead. Next, or maybe the same thing, would be an agenda for a Convention of the States to better solidify the meaning and understanding of our Constitution in the current time frame. Yes, there are risks with this, but if the postulated sweep of Republicanism has actually occurred, then the country’s mood and orientation should also be more closely aligned with a liberty agenda than a progressive one. We may have to/ want to strike while the iron is hot, so to speak.
The core issue behind term limits is balancing the benefits from people staying long enough in office to develop the knowledge and experience and contacts for their role, vs. staying so long they become entrenched, unresponsive, and corrupted. I would suggest after two or three terms that the incumbent be required to achieve a super-majority of the votes to remain for an additional term. Maybe 3% to 10% more for each subsequent election, depending on the office and other factors. This shows they really are doing the people’s business in a satisfactory way and thus deserve continuation. I would endorse a max of say 18 years in any office or maybe 24 years total combined political federal “service”. Gerrymandering is another related issue and in some districts this scheme would not change what we have now.
President Donald Trump Jr in 2024
I remain skeptical of dynasty situations. Just because the adult children or siblings (or spouses) of a president are in/ around the WH does not make them presidential in their own right. Trump Jr. is now 42, going on 43, but taking over his father’s organization is not the same type of business success as building up one of his own (even if it also included his siblings). In today’s modern world I think we should amend the COTUS so presidents have to be at least 50 or 55 years old, to have comparable experience as someone 35 years old in 1789. I don’t know of anything negative about him, per se, expect perhaps his recent marital change vs. an image as a family man.
But I believe caution is advised. Maybe 2036 or 2040??
Kristi Noem or Nikki Haley 2024
That sounds dark and gloomy! — CNN