Lots of Q drops synchronised up with Trump, White House or Congress drops.
keeping everyone busy and sleepless.
Basically Thursday & Fridays stuff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE0OGD9JrdE
Yesterday & today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhY-BiiFLjw
I am not doing Q videos because I think Prayingmedic is doing a much better job.
It looks like Adam Schiff is in the cross hairs for lying to congress and leaking to the media. The Media players MSNBC, etc were in tears with the Mueller details because they as the recipients of those illegal leaks also face charges under the law. It was either get Trump or fall.
In the Westminister system there is a penalty for lying to Parliament that applied to even to parliamentarians. The US congress has forgotten they also have a similar clause. Trump has remembered.
4 replies on “Q is keeping Prayingmedic busy”
The best part about Q is knowing most things in advance. I would say that Praying Medic is the best decoder but IPOT is more fun to watch, so I watch both. We knew about the border wall months ago, we knew who was going to build it, we knew where the funding was coming from, we knew about the Mueller report, etc. I can’t wait until the patriots fight board starts filling up with indictments. These people have no idea of the wave that is coming towards them. It’s actually better to know about most of this stuff in advance. I’m not so worried about things and I am less shocked when they happen. It’s no surprise to me that the media goes after Q like a swarm of angry hornets. The greatest threat always is attacked the most. POTUS is number one and Q is second on the list. And no one ever wonders why that is? Of course, the latest is Amazon’s acquisition of the Ring doorbell company. They’re using it to spy on people. I almost bought one of those. Glad I didn’t.
Actually I find that the Q drops are making the news boring. I go on Drudge and see the great revelation of the day is last months Q news.
Interesting point! lol
Ring is not a real threat, all they get is that your home, perhaps. Gary North and others have pointed out the problem of mass surveillance. You get far to much information to analyse even with computers so you end up with too many targets. If a terrorist acts then the data can be trawled though for court evidence but the terrorist rarely survives the arrival of the cops. Your left with anger that someone had unprocessed evidence or knew stuff but no one acted. Suspicion is not evidence of a crime. The surveillance state is real but its advocates have no idea what to do with the evidence. Where is the scandal that Tom came home late and had trouble finding his keys at the door?