Categories
BW Member Blog

The Anthelmintic that could change everything.

Kory Weinstein Ivermectin end plandemic-ff9b4fbb
The Tablet That Cracked COVID
 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE 

  • Ivermectin, a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic[anthelmintic] that also has anti-inflammatory activity, has shown remarkable success in preventing and treating COVID-19 
  • The drug is available over-the-counter in some countries, such as France, and 3.7 billion doses have been administered in the last 40 years, with serious side effects extremely rare 
  • Expert physicians have called on the NIH, CDC and FDA to review the expansive data on ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, keep those with early symptoms from progressing and help critically ill patients recover 
  • Legal fights have ensued, with family members enlisting lawyers to battle hospital boards in order to give their dying loved ones the lifesaving pills — even when all other treatment options have been exhausted 
  • Despite the undisputable data showing ivermectin works for COVID-19, it continues to be ignored in favor of more expensive, and less effective, treatments and mass experimental vaccination 

 

 

 

More Good News on Ivermectin 
 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE 

  • Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that may be even more useful against COVID-19 than hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). However, like HCQ, use of ivermectin has been globally suppressed, discouraged and even warned against, despite decades of safe use for other ailments 
  • In the U.S., the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has been calling for widespread adoption of Ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19 
  • What makes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-19 is the fact that it works both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals are required, as well as in the inflammatory stage, when the viral load drops off and anti-inflammatories become necessary 
  • A scientific review funded by the WHO found ivermectin reduced COVID-19 deaths by 75%. It also increased viral clearance. A meta-analysis of a greater number of studies found a 68% reduction in deaths 
  • Despite robust scientific support for ivermectin, the WHO, the U.S. FDA and NIH all refuse to recommend the drug on grounds of insufficient evidence 

 

 

BIG NEWS: Peer Reviewed Study Demonstrates Efficacy of Ivermectin in Prophylactis and Treatment of COVID — And It Won’t Kill You! (thegatewaypundit.com)
 
 
 
 
Mexico and India data on Ivermectin (Pierre Kory & Bret Weinstein) (odysee.com)
 
 
 
 

Bret Weinstein says he and others have been ‘censored’ for their analyses that run counter to the medical establishment

Bret Weinstein explains that if Ivermectin works effectively, the debate about vaccines is over

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ivermectin: Can a Drug Be “Right-Wing”? – by Matt Taibbi – TK News by Matt Taibbi (substack.com)
 

A potential Covid-19 treatment has become hostage to a larger global fight between populists and anti-populists

 
 
Don’t mention Ivermectin; it’ll upset the vaccine rollout – BizNews.com
 
Small Excerpt Below:
Merck’s patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996 and they produce less than 5% of global supply. In 2020 they were asked to assist in Nigerian and Japanese trials but declined both. In 2021 Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against Covid-19 and bizarrely claimed, “A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies” of the a drug they donated to be distributed in mass rollouts, by primary care workers, in mass campaigns, to millions in developing countries. The media reported the Merck statement as a blinding truth without looking at the conflict of interests when days later, Merck received $356m from the US government to develop an investigational therapeutic. The WHO even quoted Merck, as evidence, that it didn’t work, in their recommendation against the use of Ivermectin. It’s a dangerous world when corporate marketing determines public health policy.  Global vaccine rollout, to everyone, is the policy.
 
 
 
 
 
I strongly believe Ivermectin used prophylactically, in early treatment and even later for those suffering from Long Haulers can be the pathway to end the Plandemic.   
Because Orange Man Bad Kool-aid has been slurped up by too many who should be practicing medicine instead of politics,  we are in this Plandemic nightmare.
Shame on Merck!
 
Choices.  May yours be wise.

23 replies on “The Anthelmintic that could change everything.”

New Study Shows COVID Could Be Treated for Less than $1 a Day
A double-blind study of an antiparasitic drug that’s been in the news a lot lately not only shows that the drug can reduce the duration and infectiousness of COVID-19, but can do all that on less than $1 a day.
That drug is ivermectin, and professor Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba, says his studies, recently published on RXiv, show it is a cost-effective treatment that can help shorten the infection period. Schwartz studied 89 volunteers diagnosed with the virus. Half received ivermectin; the other half, a placebo.
“Nearly 72% of volunteers treated with ivermectin tested negative for the virus by Day 6,” The Jerusalem Post reported. “In contrast, only 50% of those who received the placebo tested negative.” And, besides feeling better quicker, fewer ivermectin patients also were found to be infectious — 13%, compared to 50% of the placebo group.
The findings also showed that “there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days,” Schwartz said.
Ivermectin is an inexpensive drug that was approved by the U.S. FDA in 1987 for treatment of a parasitic roundworm.
SOURCE: The Jerusalem Post August 2, 2021

“If you were wondering why Ivermectin was suppressed, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID-19, the contract cannot be voided…

“About payment, the country has no right ‘to withhold, offset, recoup or debit any amounts owed to Pfizer, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, against any other amount owed (or to become due and owing) to it by Pfizer or a Pfizer Affiliate.,,

“There is no limit to the liability of the country in case of ‘the indemnity given by it under Section 8 (Indemnification)’ or if the Purchaser failed to pay Pfizer…

“The Purchaser waives any right for immunity, it give up any law that might cap the obligation to pay damages to Pfizer. Comment: The court in New York has the capacity to hold international assets of a country if the country failed the contract…

“Damaged goods: THE ONLY WAY to get a recall is if you can prove cGMP fault…

“‘For clarity, Purchaser shall not be entitled to reject any Product based on service complaints unless a Product does not materially conform to Specifications or cGMP…’

“Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) is regulated by the FDA. cGMP will tell you NOTHING about mRNA, because we never had cGMP of mRNA vaccine, so you cannot prove cGMP malpractice…”

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/information-security-expert-on-revealed-pfizer-agreements-theres-good-reason-pfizer-fought-to-hide-the-details-of-these-contracts/

Somewhere in my emails to myself I have saved the YouTube video of the guy who testified in front of Congress regarding Ivermectin while expressing his frustration that it wasn’t being taken more seriously. Their lack of interest in defining treatment protocols and censorship of conversations involving anything else other than their lie including the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin told me long ago that they are horrible, evil people who care more about power than humans.
Thankfully, the rest of America is finally waking up to that fact. If Hillary had been elected, we’d still be “searching for a vaccine” which would be “just on the horizon if America only contributed more tax dollars to a cure” (Fraudci orginally estimated 2-3 years).
Such money would, of course, be redistributed to other countries by the Marxists under the guise that they give two whits about third world countries and not global power over a population stripped of its resources, and the justification would have been that America’s wealth was “built on slavery.”:
Thank the good Lord that President Trump interrupted their plans and exposed them for what they are.

I believe YouTube deleted Dr. Kory testifying before Congress.

YouTube deleted the vids with Senator Ron Johnson, too.

Did you know Hillary had a plan to appropriate everyone’s 401(k), IRA, TSP if she’d’ve won in 2016???
Hedge Fund Managers were crying harder than she was as Trump won.

God’s Grace and Mercy Clinton lost.

By Post Author

I did not know that about Hillary and the 401(k)’s, IRA’s and TSP’s. Do you have a reference I can share? (not doubting you)
She’s just evil.

Did you see this? *****”Foreign genes or viruses can be introduced into the target population asymptomatically***** using gene-therapy vectors *****enabling a biological weapon attack to be mounted covertly.”***** At the 6:14 mark….Official 2011 Chinese government submission discusses ‘weaponising specific viruses to target races’….https://youtu.be/Dum5i8B2Vdo  
I will never get any vaccine these people recommend. Note the part where they say they can covertly issue a bioweapon attack as the targets won’t even realize it. No thanks!!!
https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif

Tell me how our intelligence agencies missed this again…? And does anyone know who was President of the U.S. back in 2011? This is way past incompetence or negligence in my opinion. Somebody or something is behind this.

Targeted Viruses. Sad to say, NO, am not surprised. Communists seem to embrace mass genocide. This way, they wouldn’t have to fire a single shot from a gun.

By Post Author

Exactly, and that’s what people don’t understand. I don’t blame them. I’m just waking up to it myself. Not due to being “radicalized.” I have a brain and I use it to examine the evidence like Curtis Bowers and Glenn Beck and others have. They already advocate for depopulation. Biden’s nominee Tracy Stone-Manning specifically states it.
100 million dead over the last 100 years or so. Why the hell would they care about 4 million people worldwide, 3,000 Americans on 9/11, or the 861 injured and 61 dead in Las Vegas or the 17 killed at Parkland High School in their bid for world conquest? Pol Pot killed 1.5 to 2 million of his fellow Cambodians in a nation of 7.8 million people. They have zero respect to life.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide
As Bill, Scott and Steve have touched upon and we all have lived, it’s difficult to understand and accept a) we are in danger as a nation. No one wants to give up their sense of safety and security, b) our own elected representatives have betrayed us and c) yes there are evil people out there who have no sense of ethics, no morality and no regard for human life.trouble as a nation who won’t hesitate to kill babies or children.
As soon as someone becomes “woke” (lol; I say we hijack the word) and accepts these things, the picture becomes clear to them VERY quickly. I think the majority of Americans just have no idea quite yet how bad it is. They’re starting to understand though (many through their experience with CRT in schools) that we aren’t “conspiracy theorists.”
I don’t know if I buy into everything that Alex Jones said. First of all, I don’t know all of his claims. Second, some of the things like chemtrails do seem far-fetched. Third, Alex buddy, take it down a notch and you’d win more support.
I have to admit though that he introduced me to Bilderberg which got my wheels turning asking why our world leaders were getting together every year protected by armed security. What were they plotting in private that they didn’t want us to know?
He also covered the history including the debate as to how best to control people…democracy with a bunch of rules and regs or pure socialism/communism. There’s one video where he goes through everything including how the Rothschild’s made their first fortune. Whoever it was at the time basically left France and told England that Napoleon had won. When the markets tanked, he bought everything for pennies on the dollar. Then, obviously, the news came out that Napoleon had lost and the Rothschild family made their first fortune. Or so the story goes. I haven’t verified it for myself.
The Rothschild’s and globalists aside. Hitler. Stalin. Mao. Pol Pot. Kim Jong-un. History is littered with bloodthirsty tyrants. I am not under the delusion that our establishment is full of completely virtuous, moral and selfless people as I believe the majority of our founders were. Most of them no longer believe that God will judge them one day (which is exactly why you want believing Christians or Jews in charge), and so rather than serving us as Christ taught in order to achieve greatness in the next life, they serve themselves.
Sorry for the long post. I got going and had to put in on the page.
God bless. Enjoy your day. We are, believe it or not, winning, and the best news is that we don’t need to take up arms to achieve ultimate victory.

Just read a perfectly relevant warning from Christ in Luke…
Luke 23:28-31
28Jesus turned and said to them, “Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for me; weep for yourselves and for your children. 29For the time will come when you will say, ‘Blessed are the childless women, the wombs that never bore and the breasts that never nursed!’ 30Then
“ ‘they will say to the mountains, “Fall on us!”
and to the hills, “Cover us!” ’ b
31For if people do these things when the tree is green, what will happen when it is dry?”

In other words, if the tyrants do this now, imagine how bad it will get.
https://biblehub.com/niv/luke/23.htm

Thank you for posting this!!

I have been taking ivermectin twice a week (or more) for over a year. It prevented me from getting the CCP virus in February when everyone else in my family had it (and I continued to interact with them). (I took it every other day during that time.) It continues to chip away at my long-term viruses that cause my chronic fatigue. I am feeling better now than I have in years.

I tried posting about ivermectin several times here over the last year and a half. Some people were mockingly skeptical. You can lead a horse to water and all that.

I am on a weekly basis with Ivermectin. I was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease toward the end of last year. Because of that and other comorbidities, I will NOT take the Jab. See the chart below.
I also believe your plasma/Vitamin D3 level is important to not contract Wuhanvirus or at least ameliorate it if you do. The last study I read suggested at least 60 ng/ml. Last mine was checked with a blood test was 66 ng/ml. I take one D3 capsule 1,000 IU per day.
I am so sorry your posts weren’t well received.
Three Stages of Truth:
First: It is Ridiculed.
Second: It is Violently Opposed.
Third: It is Accepted as Being Self-Evident

May you continue to improve and count your blessings you had data and acted on it for the betterment of your wellbeing. That is a blessing!!

This data in chart form explains who shouldn’t get the Jab——–

By Post Author

Well, at the risk of being kicked off the reservation again, I have to say that everything Those in Authority say about “Vitamin” D is wrong. Yes, it is implicated in immune system function, but it is correlation, not causation. It is not a vitamin. Your body produces all you need. Unsupplemented populations from the Poles to the Equator all have a D level of between 12 and 24. THAT is normal. When you are sick, your body downregulates it as part of the immune response. When your body needs more, it makes more. Supplementation and keeping it artificially high is counterproductive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60-VAun2R6Q&pp=sAQA

I just had a conversation with someone I trust who saw their doctor. This person queried the physician about Ivermectin. The doctor said that they are forbidden to write a prescription for it. Seriously! Forbidden!!!!!

I think it depends on who writes the doctor’s paycheck. If the doctor works for some kind of “system,” they may indeed be forbidden by company policy.

Any independent doctor should be able to write the prescription.

Getting it filled may be another matter. It seems that some big chain pharmacies that were filling prescriptions for ivermectin a few weeks ago have started refusing, depending on the how the prescription is written. Or they might require the prescription to be divided so that you don’t get “too much” at one time. (They don’t do this for other drugs.)

There was a reddit thread about methods to obtain ivermectin from doctors via tele-visits, and where and how to get it filled (where I got the info in the previous paragraph).

It is also available without a prescription from some foreign mail-order pharmacies.

Leave a Reply