What is ‘The Great Reset’? It’s not just socialism. It’s not a revolution. To understand it — and to resist it — we must start with the technocracy…the ones trying to “hack” our humanity.
Bill Whittle, a former Hollywood editor, and go-to source for compelling historical narrative and political insight, serves a devoted corps of patriots we call Members. If you like this video, and think more people should hear ideas like this, consider becoming a Member. Click the big green button above. To donate without joining, click the big blue button.
54 replies on “The ‘Great Reset’ Part One: TECHNOCRACY”
One of your best Bill.
Thank you.
Bill, this needs to get to the attention of Steve Bannon. He spends a significant part of his on-air time talking about transhumanism, as well as the Party of Davos, Big Tech, the Great Reset, etc.
If you could get onto his show just once, the promotion to his audience would probably be all you need to get your movie made.
I just stopped by to say I’m delighted to see you making more Firewall. It’s the main reason for my being a member, to encourage you to make more of these great shows.
spectacular episode!
Harari is the man to watch.
Harari just published a children’s book series. It is aimed at preteens. He is pushing for it to be used as school curriculum. The subject is what it means to be human.
Been waiting for this.
“The kind of people who own and control things that their masters did not”.
Sounds like you meant the reverse of that.
Excellent!
Perfect timing on this video series. Watched it with my Dad. Eagerly awaiting the next parts, as I have a few friends that I’m going to send them to. The in-depth dive is exactly what we need.
Re: Yuval Harari…. Dr. Mengele, I presume?
Bill: The Firewall Thinker at work—Love it!
Thank you Bill for a very thought provoking video. One question it prompted for me was whether or not the “wisdom of the crowds” theory you expound upon lends credence to the idea that Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) an be achieved. Simplistically speaking, by feeding a giant computer with enough data to draw its own conclusions about potential outcomes, could we create “intelligence”? So for example if you programed a computer to “guess” at the weight of the ox, with enough iterations, would it come up with the answer? And if so can this be generalized to other questions/predictions? Anyway, just thinking out loud. Thanks again.
It would not be “intelligence”, but a derivative of the intelligence of others. It has zero intuition. It cannot exist without the product of real intelligences perceiving and deducing.
Bill, thank you, thank you, thank you! I have missed these a LOT. I wish you could do one every day, but I’ll gladly settle for one every few months!
love the firewall!
Well done, Bill. Great to see the format back. Take as much time to make the case the way it needs to be made.
Our educational system should license Bill’s content and stop teaching the idiotic racial nonsense that corrupts young minds and undermines our cuture
Firewall always surprises. This episode is surprisingly surprising. Bill’s examples of the genius of all of us makes the best argument I’ve ever heard against the aristocracy of the few.
We are truly blessed that we have such an observant teacher amongst us and I’m glad of the day I first heard Bill Speak on his old show, Trifecta. I never knew how good he’d get.
But I cannot say that without also praising all the people with whom he surrounds himself. Iron sharpens iron: Scott Ott, Steven Green, and Alfonzo Rachel. Every one is a hit in the gold. Together they are a national treasure.
Thanks for this Firewall. I’m eager to watch Part II.
Love how you’re laying out the foundation for this slowly, instead of jumping directly to Klaus Schwab. I’m sending this to my social networks to help getting more traction on this, as most people are blissfully unaware of the magnitude of these ideas and how widespread the are, only seeing bits and pieces but not connecting the dots.
This trend is all prophesied in the Bible. Cheer up! Things will only get worse… until King Jesus Returns.
Amen.
I think that AI will use 666 points of data to distill the average thought.
The ‘thought leader’ stating that we will all be technically evolvable and absent of free will is indeed reductionist and depressing in his thinking.
I hope that I wasn’t programmed to agree with you, Bill.
I have a son with Asperger’s. You framed him perfectly.
Thanks Bill, really liked this Firewall. Keep ’em comin’.
If you haven’t read my previous comment below, then please do so because this is related to that.
If —
There are “really smart people” who believe they can “hack humans” but their base premises are false (Impending and immediate climate disaster, men are women, women are men, election fraud is election integrity, being racist isn’t racist and not being racist is racist, etc. There are lots of examples.)
Then —
Their efforts at hacking humans will either result in null or negative outcomes and not what they’re trying to achieve. GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) would seem to apply to that situation.
It seems to me that these “really smart people” are not nearly so smart as they believe themselves to be. Not only are their base premises false but they think they can ignore anything outside the “frame” Bill refers to in the video. As Bill points out, anything outside the frame is beyond their control and therefor a wildcard. There will reliably always be more outside than inside that frame.
So … They’re doomed to failure but that doesn’t mean they won’t take the rest of us down with them when they fall.
If, then. It’s pretty Basic. Well done ACTS, both posts.
LOL, thanks. You get a C++
(Anyone who gets “Basic” will know I didn’t give you a letter grade.)
Visual Basic?
Only if you’re Object Oriented … 😉
Freshman in high school…special pencils and cards and card readers. My introduction to “computer programming ” in 1973.
Then Alan Kaye came along and changed everything.
Nope! Not a C++. Not me. Just a ‘basic’ guy…..
You are a very good Assembler of references. Get yourself a cup of Java. 😏
ooof – that’s nearly a dad joke, and I sadly got it. ;-(
Thanks. I could not come up for one using Fortran or Cobol. Or PL/I. Or SQL or……. And I refused to mention PYTHON.
All the CS folks enjoy your humor!
It’s important to understand where the ox and submarine stories fall apart. They’re valid because the guesser’s input is untainted and made in a genuine effort to — Win the ox or find the submarine. Or select the best possible leadership via elections. As long as that holds then what Bill is describing is a good way to steer for the future. If those things are not valid then the outcome is being slanted. For instance …
The ox story will hold true as long as the ox didn’t have 100 lbs. or more of metal ingots hidden inside the carcass. If that were the case then the resultant average would be totally invalid.
The submarine story will hold true as long as the information given to those people trying to “guess” the location of the submarine is accurate as is possible. If the Scorpion went down in the Atlantic Ocean but all the people who had input on the possible location of the wreck were told the sub went down in the Pacific Ocean … Then the sub will never be found.
Why do I bring this up? Because the Left is hiding lead bars in the ox and telling people that the submarine sank in the Pacific. They’re doing this in an effort to skew the results in their own favor.
That doesn’t work on everyone but it works on enough people to have a very significant effect.
The Left says things like “We’re all going to die of climate catastrophe in 12 years!” Anyone with two brain cells to keep each other company can look at historical climate data and realize that not only is climate changing, it’s always changing. It’s not enough to acknowledge that yes, indeed the climate is changing and that may or may not be a bad thing for humanity. To point out that due to the minor rise in CO2 and small temperature increase global food production has increased by 10%. Or that water vapor, which is uncontrollable and not subject to human activities is the major climate driver and exceeds the influence of CO2 by several orders of magnitude.
No, you have to go all the way to “We’re all going to die!” or you’re labelled a “climate denier”. Because “science”.
The Left tells you that men can be women. NOT just look like women or act like women, but BE women. That the fact there is no “trans” man masquerading as a woman, who like a real woman has two “X” chromosomes rather than an “X” and a “Y” chromosome is a scientific irrelevance. Because according to the Left “gender is a social construct” so a real science like genetics which is far more understood and accurate than climate science can be ignored. Clearly science only applies if and when it suits an agenda. So the “science” of the Left is purely a matter of convenience. Which is no science at all.
The ox is being loaded with lead and the submarine is claimed to have sank in the Pacific. That’s where the idea of the sum of all opinions averaged will lead to the best possible answer fails. It’s meant to fail. In the anti-Theology of the Left that is a phenomena that must be overcome and manipulated.
Therein lies the difference between us and them. They are at war with reality and if we’re not damn careful they just might win. Oh, they can’t change and mold reality, only God can do that but they see themselves as petty gods. They are subscribers to The Big Lie, which is the first lie of Lucifer himself —
“I will ascend to the Throne of the Most High, I will become like God.”
This is nothing new. It is the subject of cautionary tales going all the way back to the Garden of Eden. Whether you practice a religious faith or not, you do well to heed and understand the gravity of that one Big Lie.
There’s another word for this kind of thing. That word is “hubris” and it means to challenge God (or gods) on their own terms (a presumption towards deity). Hubris is the act of making oneself a god and even if you’re not religious, or perhaps even especially if you’re not religious, that’s always a bad thing that ends in disaster.
As I like to say, which science – God’s or Satan’s?
And you are right in saying that but ….
The problem is that for the anti-theological irreligious Left there is no Satan. So that idea doesn’t get across to them. We fulfill that role in their belief system. That’s why they demonize us, they have to. So …
Yes, it really is a battle between God and Satan or for those who prefer a more secular view, Good and Evil.
I’m a Christian myself. I believe in God and that means I believe in Satan too. I often phrase things in both religious and secular terms because not everyone is a person of Faith. I want them to understand that these things are not “merely” religious in nature. The principles hold true either way someone chooses to look at it.
You might find me doing that a bit weird but something else weird about it is that many people I have known who were agnostic or atheist (but not anti-theists, that’s a different critter) have come to an acceptance of God the Creator and His Son Jesus Christ by means of this style of argument.
I don’t push my faith on those people, I simply point out the synergy between God and Right and Satan and Wrong and eventually they come around. So that isn’t me “converting” them, it’s me opening their mind up to the truth and letting God pour it in.
He is a lot better at that stuff than I am.
Everyone has their approach that works best for them. But in this case, my comment was not intended for any kind of conversion effort. I think even a secularist understands the symbolism.
Point taken and understood. I wasn’t criticizing your comment, merely amplifying on it because the opportunity presented itself and the thought occurred to me to bring up what I said …
With that in mind and on general principle I’ll just add that while a secularist may understand the symbolism many of them will also flag such symbolism as an excuse to disregard the context the symbolism refers to — Because of the religious connotations of the symbols applied.
As you say, much depends on the nature of the conversation and the perspective of the conversationalists. It was not my intention to imply you had said or done anything incorrect.
You did not. What you said was absolutely factual.
I’ve been involved with posting online comments, messages and essays for decades and I’m always acutely aware that while you may be addressing me and vice-versa there is a potential crowd of people with varying perspectives that might read what we have to say. That is a fault of mine and no fault of yours at all.
One of your best posts!
Very well put.
Great video, Mr. Whittle. Speaking of the “selfish ledger” it whatever this fascists can it, I understand that Mr. Ott tends to play the Devil’s Advocate on the show, but what still bothers me is how his Apple Watch or whatever gave him a nudge to “get his steps in” and he agreed. Yeah, moving and such is great but it reminds me of that video where the social engineering begins. I, too, am trying to get into better shape and need things to keep me accountable, but I don’t want an app to do that, I have friends and family… you know people who care about me and not what I can do for them.
THIS.
Another day where I feel like my annual membership is such a great investment
A very, very smart man just posted a fascinating video. I can’t wait for Part 2.
It is because these Aristocrats know this is true that they must convince us that our very human desires for Freedom must be suppressed and indeed branded as dangerous.
Not just that they know it’s true, but that they know it’s true & hate it.
Because Freedom = unpredictability – which to their mind is a form of chaos. They want everything controlled, predictable.
Great job, Bill, although this episode wants me to yell out the window, “I am not an app!”
I love the Firewalls and am particularly happy that you are tackling this subject. I look forward to the rest of this series!
It’s videos like this that make me proud to be able to say that I support you guys, even if it’s only in a very small way. Blessings, and keep up the great work!
I have missed Firewall, so imagine my surprise when I saw this new episode today! The Firewall format is such an effective way of communicating ideas, and this new episode is – as many Firewalls have been – informative, funny, entertaining, and a bit scary.
Hit the nail on head as usual, sir.
GO Bill ! :- )