Categories
Bill Whittle Now

Trump’s Victory Speech: Bill Whittle Previews President’s Remarks to 75 Million Biden Backers

When President Donald J. Trump finally finishes his legal challenges and turns the apparent outcome of the election, he’ll have to address some 75 million backers of erstwhile President-Elect Joe Biden.

When President Donald J. Trump finally finishes his legal challenges and turns the apparent outcome of the election, he’ll have to address some 75 million backers of erstwhile President-Elect Joe Biden. Bill Whittle puts on his speechwriter hat to suggest an approach to Trump’s victory speech.

Bill Whittle Now with Scott Ott is a production of our Members who not only fund some 40 shows per month, but produce their own content. You can become a Member now, or choose to make a one-time donation. Either way, thank you.

Listen to the Audio Version

Bill Whittle Network ยท Trump’s Victory Speech: Bill Whittle Previews President’s Remarks to 75 Million Biden Backers

12 replies on “Trump’s Victory Speech: Bill Whittle Previews President’s Remarks to 75 Million Biden Backers”

I think Trump would make a speech about how he will continue to make America great for EVERYBODY. Whether you voted for him or not, he will promise to make your life and your country better than you have ever seen.

Why would Donald Trump make a victory speech to the Biden voters?

Because of the reasons given in the video. That’s why.

Despite the attitudes portrayed elsewhere on this page, those people are still Americans and most of the Democrat voters were in no way attempting to nor cognizant of any concerted effort to “deny us our rights”. Most of them don’t think that way and they didn’t do what they’re being accused of by some here. They’re naive, they’re indirectly responsible for the current political upheaval, but they’re not trying to harm you. In their naivety they might do some harm to you but it’s not intentional because in their wrong-headed way they think they’re helping everyone. They’re not, I’m not saying they are, I’m saying they’re not evil to the core and deserving of summary punishment thereby.

They may be guilty of neglect but it’s not intentional malfeasance. Using rhetoric such as —

“Once an individual denies another his unalienable rights, which are enshrined within and protected by our Constitution, all protections are void, and the fight for survival is one that is fought to the death.” (Emphasis mine)
and …
“As they were unwilling to recognize our individual rights and our constitution, they have abandoned all claim to have their rights recognized.” (Emphasis is again mine.)

… are counterproductive and the surest way I can think of to be absolutely certain that the other side cheats harder next time. Or if they come to power and are able to do so that it will be us who is rounded up and denied recourse to the law. If you make it a fight to the death, you better consider that if you lose it will be YOUR death and the deaths of a lot of innocent, patriotic, right thinking patriots and their families and friends. That’s what happens in a civil war.

Because language like that makes it sound like the idea is to line them all up and shoot them. That’s a lot of bullets. And a lot of bodies. What do you intend to do with their carcasses? Oh, wait, someone already figured that out and the solution they came up with was ovens and crematoria. The people who came up with that solution only had 7 million dead to get shed of, over ten times that number is even harder to cope with.

This is war rhetoric and we’re not there yet. It’s not inconceivable that we might actually get there but that day is not today. I actually experienced a Civil War in Lebanon in the early 1980’s and it’s not nearly as much fun as some people seem to think.

Remember, the way the opposition sees it, we’re all Nazis and white supremacists, that’s what they’ve been told and it’s a deception in quest of power. If you take the above stance with them you justify that attitude to them. It’s not right, it’s not fair, it’s not just but that’s what happens. Because you are no longer in the right yourself. Then they have every reason to take that stance with us not for political pull nor illusions of virtue but for corporeal survival. You can’t educate nor convert others to your way of thinking if you’re dead. Never forget that what you are willing to do to other people they will then become willing and justified, in their minds, of doing the same to you.

Force is force. If the time ever comes when we need to exert that kind of force it won’t be because the other side cheated on a narrowly contested election. I can see some dire and dark days ahead with someone like Joe Biden (and more likely than not Heels-up Harris) in charge but I do not see a civil war breaking out over this current scenario. Not yet, not by a long shot.

I understand the anger and frustration behind such rhetoric but that’s not an excuse.

I have to wonder how many “fights to the death” someone who would say something like that has actually been in? I’ve been in more than one and while it is certainly exhilarating when you come out of it standing, it’s anything but the kind of fun it appears some people think it will be

I took an oath “To preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and to bear true faith and allegiance to the same.” There’s nothing in there about stacking up the bodies of misguided, misinformed, duped Americans.

There is a domestic enemy right now — it’s the corrupted Press and those who knowingly and willfully enable that influence. It remains to be determined how that is going to be coped with but I’m fairly certain it won’t involve a “fight to the death” with the press corps or any of their victims. Because the people who are being led astray by the press, the academy and the big tech companies are as much a victim of them as we are. They just don’t realize it yet.

I realize mine is probably not going to be a popular stance at the moment and I don’t care. It’s what’s right. I learned a long time ago that if you treat people like rabid dogs then rabid dogs is what they will become. We do need to cut out the rot but destroying the Republic in the process is not the way to go. Eventually this situation will right itself and in the end it may take force of arms to accomplish that. But losing an election to cheaters is not a reason to go there … yet.

May God Bless America again. She needs it now as much as any time before.

Semper Fi

Not to go off track here but at 9:35 Bill speaking as Donald Trump said, “One of the reasons that 70 million people support me for President:”. Did anyone else feel a bit of a tingle? Bill, you get my vote!
Bill was spot on as usual and Scott once again played his part masterfully.
Scott. if you get hate male because of the roll you play, know that it is a credit to your acting skills! Those of us who have gotten to know you better know that you are a constitutionalist and patriot!
Well done gentlemen!

Did you see the t-shirt someone sent Scott? It says “I am not a Liberal, I just play one on TV!”

“Scott. if you get hate male because of the roll you play…”
you mean like Tom Hanks in the movie Philadelphia? ๐Ÿ™‚

We should tell them in very clear language as they have been telling us for decades STFU! As they were unwilling to recognize our individual rights and our constitution, they have abandoned all claim to have their rights recognized. If the constitution cannot protect us, it cannot protect them! They have no standing in the matter.

May they go to HELL and pay for the trip!

Lionell, I cannot find the words to declare my total agreement with your point, so I shall just repeat it:
Once an individual denies another his unalienable rights, which are enshrined within and protected by our Constitution, all protections are void, and the fight for survival is one that is fought to the death. The success of civilization requires mutually acceptable agreements between all parties — without such agreements humans revert to anarchy.

Patrick Henry said the same thing.. Each generation must have its patriots. We are always only one generation away from losing our freedom. A near quote from one our greatest generation’s president.

Scott, you didn’t take the episode off track … or at least the side track was worth-while. Because as much as I like Bill, I was asking the same question. I am satisfied with Bill’s clarifying answer, an answer I’ve used myself recently in internet arguments.

Also, re: “muddying the waters” – a buddy of mine with a somewhat successful blog (Morgan Freeberg, House of Eratosthenes) and some co-blogging friends at Rotten Chestnuts came up with a term for the people who do this kind of thing in the comments section.

We call them “cuttlefish”. Because what they do, when presented with an overwhelmingly rational argument that undercuts what they’re saying, basically squirt a massive cloud of rhetorical ink and swim away from their point as fast as they can.

We rather love the term.

OK, just looked them up. That is not an attractive creature. Making your use of the term even more appropriate.

Leave a Reply