A War Plan
Bill’s war plan, which is based retaking the government from the bottom up, is a fine plan. However, it does have some, arguably, insurmountable hurdles. The fact that, it is the enemy who counts the votes, is one of them.
While I was in the shower this morning, an idea hit me. It’s not all thought out yet, but please hear me out.
What is the source of the Democrats power? Well, besides the fact that they cheat and disregard the law with impunity, the major source of their power is that they control the population centers. Their cheating wouldn’t count for a hill of beans except for the fact that these population centers overwhelm the rural and more conservative areas of the state.
The population centers are the ultimate source of their power.
We have to face the fact that we will never take over these population centers because they (the Democrats) count the votes and they will see to it that they always win. They will even approach Republicans and offer them a win now and then, as long as they follow orders given by the Democrats. That’s why many Republicans break ranks – to keep their seat. The Democrats own them.
If we can reduce the population of these population centers, they won’t be able to overwhelm and control the states. No, I’m not talking about blowing them up or taking any lives. I’m talking about a controlled migration of people out of the cities.
My plan has two distinct parts:
First part:
This First Part shouldn’t be initiated until the Second Part is in place, but let me explain the First Part, first.
There are many advantages and disadvantages to city living. In a nutshell, we will work to dismantle or destroy the advantages to city living while simultaneously working to grow the disadvantages.
Among advantages to city living are arts and culture, mass transportation, local convenience (shopping centers, grocery stores, employment, parks and recreational facilities.) Among the disadvantages are crime, traffic jams, expensive real estate, little sense of community.
By tweaking these things, it would not be difficult to make cities horrible places to live, with no benefits.
Second Part:
We don’t want all these city-folk moving to our rural areas and voting in all the same Democrat crap. We need to be ready for them and have widely distributed places to move them to. But these places that we move them to will have to be ready for them and ready to fight their communist ways. Local areas could have local laws forbidding anyone from running in a local elections without, say, ten years of residency. The founding fathers did this with their requirements for “natural born” for a period of time because there were no natural born U.S. citizens. Alternatively, the newcomers can wear an imaginary “scarlet letter” ensuring that they will never win an election anyway. That also means the we’ll have to restrict the number of transplants to these rural communities in order to keep their local voting power at a manageable level. That’s why we’ll need many communities to scatter them around.
This would not have to done for very long. Only long enough to take back control of the state governments and reform the voting laws in the states so that the Democrats can no longer control them.
The Democrats would never win without cheating. Even with the power of all of the media, the universities, the art and entertainment culture, they still have to cheat to win. Take away the power of the cities to overwhelm the states and the Democrats will whither and die.
Anyway, that’s my plan. I haven’t thought it out very far. I’m sure you guys can improve on it.
7 replies on “War Plan”
How would we tweak the conditions of the large cities?
The reason I haven’t answered your reasonable question is because I’m afraid that what I’m thinking could get me banned, or worse. But it seems like many of the cultural, high-brow things in cities are fragile and could easily lose their luster. A person could raise cockroaches or rats and then produce targeted infestations. You could even attack nice neighborhoods that way. A horrible, rotten thing to do, but it’s non-lethal and this is war. It seems like Democratic governors and mayors are already doing a great job of increasing crime rates and making cities undesirable.
I like it. I can’t raise critters myself because the only things that can live with me are dead ones – I have a black thumb and pets, well, I won’t do that to them.
I like your thinking. As to your second point, the lefty locusts are already infesting. Not just great places like Idaho and Texas, but everywhere: “Leftists Are Colonizing Red Towns Like Mine, And Local Republicans Are Clueless” by Mark Pulliam at the Federalist 01/13/2021https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/13/leftists-are-colonizing-red-towns-like-mine-and-local-republicans-are-clueless/Though it’s apparently news to tyrants like Cuomo that restricting movement between states is unconstitutional, since we can’t legally do that, red state locals have to be extra-vigilant about nipping the inevitable leftward rot at the first sign of damage to the bud. Bear in mind, the left never gives up, so pro-American residents are going to have to commit to sticking with the fight for the long-haul. Then perhaps, red places will have to consider tactics more aggressive than our typical live and let live attitude. For example, BAN the wearing of masks; mandate every household MUST own at least one firearm (there’s precedent); BAN bilingual education in schools, for example.
As to your first point, the lefty governments don’t need our help “dismantl[ing] or destroy[ing] the advantages to city living while simultaneously working to grow the disadvantages,” they’re doing an extraordinary job of that on their own. In my opinion, as with any infestation, I wish we could contain them, not help them to spread.
There are some problems with your proposal that I’d like to see explained before I’d agree to it.
1) Exacty how do you ‘tweak these things’ without infringing on the rights of the people?
2) You want to make it unpalatable for people to live in ‘big cities’. What do you consider a size limit where those ‘tweaks’ are enacted?
3) You want to make it unpalatable for people to live in big cities, yet you put restrictions on them when they move into the ‘smaller’ ones, that infringe upon their rights as American citizens. Do you really think this is right?
4) Who controls this? The State, or the Federal Government? By your wording, it sounds like a Federal thing, which is far outside the guidelines of the Constitution.
5) It sounds very much as if you’re saying something very similar to what the Democrats are currently advocating. Youre basically saying “If you vote Democrat you should be punished.” which is what the Democrats are saying about Republicans. Is that really a line you want to follow?
I’m not saying it’s right. I’m saying it’s WAR. I think there are some roads we don’t want to go down, but they are roads we have to go down, none the less. It’s a dirty war.
You need to understand the difference between government and party. There are things that the government cannot do, but party members or followers, who are not government agents but twho take their orders from The Party are able to enforce laws that don’t exist and that the government can’t mandate. The censorship that we now see is an obvious example of that.
So, you’re damned right. We’re going to have to infringe on the rights of others. We can’t allow them into the local governments and we have to restrict the number of people migrating from the cities to each local community. These are tactics that the left has been doing for decades. For example, I’ve seen college professors overwhelmingly vote against very qualified prospective hires because he or she is conservative. They make sure only leftists are hired. We have to do the same and make sure no leftest obtain positions of influence in these rural communities. It’s dirty. It’s unfair, but it is necessary. The local government can’t do it, but a united citizenry can.
Who controls this? The citizens. But we want to make living out of the city more palatable than remaining in the city. But while doing so, we have to restrict their access to political power. That’s done by keeping their numbers to small to vote in leftists.
Actually I like this idea. As someone coming from Switzerland I do not even know the concept of a mega city. We have a tiny city with several cultural brothers running through our country. We have a religious border, several language borders but the most influential one is still the city rural border.
Your strategy is quite good, if it is done in a large enough scale. Historically speaking city live was always pretty miserable compared to the countryside. In that sense our modern times is quite unusual, since people in cities have a similarly high live expectancy compared to the countryside. And this is all thanks to the work of good transport.
Especially democratic cities basically destroy themselves. They still have some things which keep people attracted to them. Somehow you need to find out what that is and quietly remove it. As someone who never visited a city larger than a million peoples big I have no clue and can not help.
I hope your idea can contribute to saving your country.